European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 305–307 | Cite as

Should platelets be labelled in plasma or saline? Consider the clinical indication

  • A. M. Peters


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aster RH, Jandl JH (1964) Platelet sequestration in man. 1. Methods. J Clin Invest 43:843–855Google Scholar
  2. Badenhorst PN, Heyns A du P, Van Reenen OR, Herbst C, Pieters H, Kotze HF, Duveyne de Wit LJ, Minnaar PC (1982) The influence of the “collection injury” on the survival and distribution of indium-111 labelled canine platelets. Br J Haematol 52:233–240Google Scholar
  3. Datz FL, Bedout RA, Baker WJ, Alazraki N, Taylor A Jr (1985) No difference in sensitivity for occult infection between tropolone and oxine labelled indium-111 leucocytes. J Nucl Med 26:469–473Google Scholar
  4. Goodwin DA, Bushberg JT, Doherty PW, Lipton MJ, Conley FK, Diamanti CI, Meares CF (1978) In-111 labelled autologous platelets for location of vascular thrombi in humans. J Nucl Med 19:626–634Google Scholar
  5. Greenberg J, Packham MA, Cazenave J-P, Reimers H-J, Mustard JF (1975) Effects on platelet function of removal of platelet sialic acid by neuraminidase. Lab Invest 32:476–484Google Scholar
  6. Greenberg JP, Packham MA, Guccione MA, Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Rand ML, Reimers H-J, Mustard JF (1979) Survival of rabbit platelets treated in vitro with chymotrypsin, plasmin, trypsin or neuraminidase. Blood 53:916–927Google Scholar
  7. Hill-Zobel RL, Gannon S, McCandless B, Tsan MF (1987) Effects of chelates and incubation media on platelet labelling with In-111. J Nucl Med 28:223–228Google Scholar
  8. Honkanen T, Jauhola S, Karppinen K, Sakki S, Vorne M (1991) Venous thrombosis: a controlled study on the performance of scintigraphy with Tc-99m HMPAO labelled platelets versus venography. Eur J Haematol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Isaka Y, Kimura K, Matsumoto M, Kamada T, Imaizumi M (1991) Functional alterations of human platelets following In-111 labelling using different incubation media and labelling agents. Eur J Nucl Med (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Kotze HF, Heyns A du P, Lotter MG, Pieters H, Roodt JP, Sweetlove MA, Badenhorst PN (1991) Comparison of oxine and tropolone methods for labelling human platelets with In-111. J Nucl Med 32:60–66Google Scholar
  11. Mortelmans L, Malbrain S, Stuyck J, De Backker C, Heynen MJ, Boogaerts M, De Roo M, Verbruggen A (1989) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of granulocyte labelling with [99m-Tc]d, 1-HMPAO. J Nucl Med 30:2022–2028Google Scholar
  12. Oster ZH, Som P (1989) New perspectives in thrombus-specific imaging: radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies. Am J Roentgenol l52:253–260Google Scholar
  13. Oster ZH, Scrivastava SC, Som P, Meinken GE, Scudder LE, Yamamoto K, Atkins HL, Brill AB, Coller BS (1985) Thrombus radio-immunoscintigraphy: an approach using monoclonal antiplatelet antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:346–348Google Scholar
  14. Packham MA, Guccione MA, Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Mustard JF (1980) Platelet sialic acid and platelet survival after aggregation by ADP. Blood 56:876–880Google Scholar
  15. Peters AM, Lavender JP (1983) Platelet kinetics with indium-111 platelets: comparison with Cr-51 platelets. Semin Thromb Hemost 9:100–114Google Scholar
  16. Peters AM, Saverymuttu SH, Reavy HJ, Danpure HJ, Osman S, Lavender JP (1983) Imaging of inflammation with In-111 tropolonate labelled leucocytes. J Nucl Med 24:39–44Google Scholar
  17. Peters AM, Saverymuttu SH, Bell RN, Lavender JP (1985a) The kinetics of short-lived indium-111 radiolabelled platelets. Scand J Haematol 34:137–145Google Scholar
  18. Peters AM, Saverymuttu SH, Malik F, Ind PW, Lavender JP (1985b) Intra-hepatic kinetics of In-111 labelled platelets. Thromb Haemost 54:595–598Google Scholar
  19. Reimers H-J, Kinlough-Rathbone RL, Cazenave J-P, Senyi AF, Hirsh J, Packham MA, Mustard JF (1976) In vitro and in vivo functions of thrombin treated platelets. Thromb Haemost 35:151–166Google Scholar
  20. Rosebrough SF, McAfee JG, Grossman ZD, Kudryk BJ, Ritter-Hrncirik CA, Witanowski LS, Maley BL, Bertrand EA, Gagne G (1990) Thrombus imaging: a comparison of radiolabeled GC4 and T2G1s fibrin-specific monoclonal antibodies. J Nucl Med 31:1048–1054Google Scholar
  21. Saverymuttu SH, Peters AM, Danpure HJ, Reavy HJ, Osman S, Lavender JP (1983) Lung transit of indium-111 labelled granulocytes. Relationship to labelling technique. Scand J Haematol 30:151–160Google Scholar
  22. Schauwecker DS, Burt RW, Park H-M, Mock BH, Witt RM, Tabolski MM, Wellman HN (1986) Clinical comparison of In-111 acetyl-acetone and In-111 tropolone granulocytes. J Nucl Med 27:1675–1679Google Scholar
  23. Scheffel U, MacIntyre PA, Evatt E, Dvornicky JA, Natarajan TK, Bolling DR, Murphy EA (1977) Evaluation of In-111 as a new high photon yield gamma emitting ‘physiological’ platelet labelling. John Hopkins Med J 140:285–295Google Scholar
  24. Som P, Oster ZH, Zamora PO, Yamamoto K, Sacker DF, Brill AB, Newell KD, Rhodes BA (1986) Radio-immuno-imaging of experimental thrombi in dogs using technetium-99m labelled monoclonal antibody fragments reactive with human platelets. J Nucl Med 27:1315–1320Google Scholar
  25. Stuttle AWJ, Klosok J, Peters AM, Lavender JP (1989) Sequential imaging of post-operative thrombus using the In-111 labelled platelet specific monoclonal antibody, P256. Br J Radiol 62:963–969Google Scholar
  26. Vallabhajosula S, Machac J, Goldsmith SJ, Lipszyc H, Badimon L, Rand J, Fuster V (1986) In-111 platelet kinetics in normal human subjects: tropolone versus oxine method. J Nucl Med 27:1669–1674Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyHammersmith HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations