Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of tissue distribution of antibiotics by kinetic hysteresis analysis

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Distribution of antibiotics can be described by kinetic hysteresis analysis when concentrations are measured in the serum and an extravascular sampling site. By calculating the area of the hysteresis loop (a simple formula is presented), the relative amount of drug transferred to an extravascular site can be quantified.

With this approach, changes in disposition characteristics can be evaluated under various pathophysiological conditions. In addition, a specific distribution coefficient may be derived for any drug when different dose levels are studied under identical conditions.

Kinetic hysteresis analysis overcomes the drawback of conventional compartment model pharmacokinetic analysis, since no simultaneous fitting of two different concentration-time courses is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergan T (1978) Kinetics of tissue penetration. Scand J Infect Dis 14 [Suppl]: 36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi JV, Tanner RD (1985) Kinetic hysteresis as a tool for analysis of pharmacokinetic data. In: Smolen VF, Ball L (eds) Controlled drug bioavailability, vol. I, Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 177–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Dost FH (1968) Grundlagen der Pharmakokinetik. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschek A (1965) Vorlesungen über höhere Mathematik, vol. I, Springer, Wien New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Flessner MF, Dedrick RL, Schultz JS (1984) A distributed model of peritoneal-plasma transport: theoretical considerations. Am J Physiol 246: R597-R607

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzinger U, Haslberger A (1985) Pharmacokinetics of cephalosporins in normal and septicaemic rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 28:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzinger U, Haslberger A, Schiel H, Omilian-Rosso R, Schütze E (1986a) Influence of endotoxin on the distribution of cephalosporins in rabbits. J Antimicrob Chemother 17:785–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzinger U, Schiel H, Georgopoulos A, Gumhold G (1986b) The utility of diffusion chambers as models for the description of drug disposition. J Antimicrob Chemother 18:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzinger U (1987) Distribution properties of cephalosporin in man: pharmacokinetic and experimental approaches. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 25: 262–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomeni R (1984) PHARM - an interactive graphic program for individual and population pharmacokinetic parameter estimation. Comp Biol Med 14:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslberger A, Ganzinger U, Reiter H, Schiel H, Millendorfer A (1987) Alterations of pharmacokinetic properties of gentamicin, penicillin G and two cephalosporins in septicaemic rabbits. J Antimicrob Chemother 20:273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Holford NHG, Sheiner LB (1981) Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin Pharmacokinet 6:429–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackquez JA, Bellman R, Kalaba R (1960) Some mathematical aspects of chemotherapy. II. The distribution of a drug in the body. Bull Math Biol 22: 309–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusko WJ, Lewis GP, Dittert LW (1972) Integral coefficients of multicompartment pharmacokinetic models. Chemotherapy 17: 109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusko WJ (1980) Guidelines for collection and pharmacokinetic analysis of drug disposition data. In: Evans WE, Jusko WJ (eds) Applied Pharmacokinetics. Applied Therapeutics, Inc. San Francisco, pp 639–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis LH, Sternberg S (1968) Advanced Calculus. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan DM, Cars O, Hoffstedt B (1986) The use of antibiotic serum levels to predict concentrations in tissues. Scand J Infect Dis 18: 381–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabath LD (1978) Tissue penetration of antibiotics, an overview. Scand J Infect Dis 14 [Suppl]: 313–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner LB (1985) Modeling pharmacodynamics: parametric and nonparametric approaches. In: Rowland M, Sheiner LB, Steimer JL (eds) Variability in drug therapy: description, estimation, and control. Raven Press, New York, pp 139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Steimer JL, Mallet A, Mentre F (1985) Estimating interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. In: Rowland M, Sheiner LB, Steimer JL (eds) Variability and drug therapy: description, estimation, and control. Raven Press, New York, pp 65–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Verotta D, Beal SL, Sheiner LB (1989) Semiparametric approach to pharmacokinetic-pharmcodynamic data. Am J Physiol 256: R10005-R10010

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal WH (1963) Physik. Springer, Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise R (1986) Methods for evaluating the penetration ofβ-lactam antibiotics into tissue. Rev Infect Dis 8 [Suppl 3]: 5325–332

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganzinger, U., Neumann, K. Quantification of tissue distribution of antibiotics by kinetic hysteresis analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 43, 517–522 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02285094

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02285094

Key words

Navigation