Skip to main content
Log in

Finding the minimum weight IIS cover of an infeasible system of linear inequalities

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given an inconsistent set of inequalities Ax ⩽b, theirreducible inconsistent subsystems (IISs) designate subsets of the inequalities such that at least one member of each subset must be deleted in order to achieve a feasible system. By solving a set covering problem over the IISs, one can determine a minimum weight set of inequalities that must be deleted in order to achieve feasibility. Since the number of IISs is generally exponential in the size of the original subsystem, we generate the IISs only when they are violated by a trial solution. Computational results on the NETLIB infeasible LP library are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Amaldi and V. Kann, The complexity and approximability of finding maximum feasible subsystems of linear relations, Technical Report ORWP 93/11, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (1993).

  2. C. Berge,Hypergraphs (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Boneh, Identification of redundancy by a set covering equivalence, in:Operational Research 84, ed. J.P. Brans (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984) pp. 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Chakravarti, Some results concerning post-infeasibility analysis,Eur. J. Oper. Res. 73 (1994) 139–143. [Also published as: Three approaches to post-infeasibility analysis, WPS-147(90), Indian Institute of Management (1990).]

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Chinneck, Finding minimal infeasible sets of constraints in infeasible mathematical programs, Technical Report SCE-93-01, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Chinneck, Finding the most useful subset of constraints for analysis in an infeasible linear program, Technical Report SCE-93-07, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Chinneck and E. Dravnieks, Locating minimal infeasible constraint sets in linear programs,ORSA J. Computing 3 (1991) 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Chvátal. A greedy heuristic for the set covering problem,Math. Oper. Res. 4 (1979) 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Fan, On systems of linear inequalities, in:Annals of Mathematical Studies Number 38: Linear Inequalities and Related Systems, eds. H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1956) pp. 99–156.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gary and D. Johnson,Computer and Intractability (Freeman, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Gleeson and J. Ryan, Identifying minimally inconsistent subsystems of inequalities,ORSA J. Computing 2 (1990) 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.J. Greenberg, Diagnosing infeasibility for min-cost network flow models, part I: dual infeasibility,IMA J. Math. in Management 1 (1987) 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.J. Greenberg, Diagnosing infeasibility for min-cost network flow models, part II: primal infeasibility,IMA J. Math. in Business and Industry 4 (1988) 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.J. Greenberg, An empirical analysis of infeasibility diagnosis for instances of linear programming blending models,IMA J. Math. in Business and Industry 4 (1992) 163–210.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.J. Greenberg, How to analyze results of linear programs, part 3: infeasibility diagnosis,Interfaces 23(6) (1993).

  16. H.J. Greenberg, Consistency, redundancy, and implied equalities in linear systems, UCD/CCM Report No. 14, Mathematics Department, University of Colorado at Denver (1993).

  17. H.J. Greenberg and F.H. Murphy, Approaches to diagnosing infeasibility for linear porograms,ORSA J. Computing 3 (1991) 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.S. Motzkin, Contributions to the theory of linear inequalities, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Basel (1933), transl. by D.R. Fulkerson, in:Theodore S. Motzkin: Selected Papers, eds. D. Cantor, B. Gordon and B. Rothschild (Birkhauser, 1983).

  19. G. Nemhauser and L. Wolsey,Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (Wiley, 1988).

  20. J. Ryan, Transversals of IIS-hypergraphs,Congressus Numerantium 81 (1991) 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Ryan, IIS-hypergraphs, draft version (1994).

  22. J.K. Sankaran, A note on resolving infeasibility in linear programs by constraint relaxation,Oper. Res. Lett. 13 (1993) 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Schrijver,Theory of Linear and Integer Programming (Wiley, 1986).

  24. J. Van Loon, Irreducibly inconsistent systems of linear inequalities,Eur. J. Oper. Res. 8 (1981) 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This author was supported by Air Force Office of Scientific Research and Office of Naval Research Contract #F49620-92-J-0248-DEF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, M., Ryan, J. Finding the minimum weight IIS cover of an infeasible system of linear inequalities. Ann Math Artif Intell 17, 107–126 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02284626

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02284626

Keywords

Navigation