Advertisement

The American Journal of Digestive Diseases

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 269–277 | Cite as

Needle biopsy of the liver

  • Charles H. Brown
Current Gastroenterology
  • 14 Downloads

Conclusions

The value of liver biopsy depends first, on adequate tissue for the pathologist to examine and second, on the astuteness of the pathologist. Minor changes in the microscopic picture can make a great difference in the diagnosis. The value of our biopsies has increased as our pathologists have had more experience with them. A pathologist experienced in interpretation of specimens of needle biopsies of the liver is essential to successful diagnosis.

Using the subcostal approach in patients with palpable livers, and the thoracic or intracostal approach in those whose livers were not experienced in interpretation of specimens of needle biopsies of the liver is essential to successful diagnosis.

Keywords

Public Health Liver Biopsy Needle Biopsy Microscopic Picture Adequate Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stanley. Cited by Davis, W. D., Scott, R. W., and Lund, H. Z. Needle biopsy of the liver.Am. J. M. Sc. 212:449, 1946.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lucatello. Cited by Iversen and Roholm.3 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iversen, P., andRoholm, K. On aspiration biopsy of liver, with remarks on its diagnostic significance.Acta. med. Scandinav. 102:1, 1939.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rossmiller, H. R., Brown, C. H., andWhitman, J. F. Needle biopsy of the liver.Cleveland Clin. Quart. 17, 64:73, 1950.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, C. H. Biopsy of the liver with the Vim-Silverman needles.Mississippi Valley M. J. 81:198, 1959.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menghini, G. One second needle biopsy of the liver.Gastroenterology 35:190, 1958.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, C. H., andMerlo, M. Fatty infiltration in the liver—response to treatment.Cleveland Clin. Quart. 26:153, 1959.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Battaglia, P. S., McCormack, L. J., andBrown, C. H. Needle biopsy of the liver in malignant hepatic disease.Am. J. Gastroenterol. 34:397–401, 1960; abstract inGastroenterology 38:801, 1960.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gebhart, W. F., Van Ommen, R. A., McCormack, L. J., andBrown, C. H. Chlorpromazine jaundice.A. M. A. Arch. Int. Med. 101:1085–1093, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Ommen, R. A., andBrown, C. H. Obstructive-type jaundice due to chlorpromazine (Thorazine).J.A.M.A. 157:321, 1955.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown, C. H., andChoisser, R. V. Obstructive biliary cirrhosis with ascites.Cleveland Clin. Quart. 18:251, 1950.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schiff, L. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilman, T., andGilman, J. Modified liver aspiration biopsy apparatus and technique, with special reference to its clinical application as assessed by 500 biopsies.South African J. Med. Sc. 10:53, June 1945.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul B. Hoeber, Inc., Medical Division of Harper & Brothers 1961

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles H. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Department of GastroenterologyThe Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and The Frank E. Bunts Educational InstituteCleveland

Personalised recommendations