Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-theoretic analysis of envisaged income tax reforms for FRG and USA

  • Section II Modelling And Preference Assessment
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are essentially two alternatives to analyse the impacts of tax reform proposals on risk-taking: the two-asset model and the certainty equivalent approach. Here risk-taking is defined in terms of the certainty equivalent approach. The paper discusses the effects of current tax reform proposals in the Federal Republic of Germany and in the United States with respect to risk-taking. Among others it is shown that there are unambiguous effects of the reform proposals as far as the upper income class is considered. Furthermore, the paper studies some impacts of the transition from the FRG-scheduleT 88 (coming into force at the beginning of 1988) to an intended schedule characterized by a linearly increasing marginal tax rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.M. Ahsan, Progression and risk-taking, Oxford Economic Papers 26 (1974) 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.J. Arrow,Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Amsterdam-London (1970).

  3. G. Bamberg and W.F. Richter, The effects of progressive taxation on risk-taking, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 44 (1984) 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Bamberg and W.F. Richter, Risk-taking under progressive taxation: three partial effects, in:Measurement in Economics. Theory and Application of Economic Indices, eds. W. Eichhorn et al. (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1988) 479–497.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Buchholz, Die Wirkung progressiver Steuern auf die Vorteilhaftigkeit riskanter Investitionen, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 37 (1985) 682–690.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.D. Domar and R.A. Musgrave, Proportional income taxation and risk-taking, Quarterly Journal of Economics 58 (1944) 388–422.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Friend and M.E. Blume, The demand for risky assets, American Economic Review 65 (1975) 900–922.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Mossin, Taxation and risk-taking: an expected utility approach, Economica 35 (1968) 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Pratt, Risk-aversion in the small and in the large, Econometrica 32 (1964) 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.K. Richter, Cardinal utility, portfolio selection, and taxation, Review of Economic Studies 27 (1960) 152–166.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.F. Richter, Modelltheoretische Analyse der Steuertarifreform 1986/88 und ihrer dämpfenden Wirkung auf die Risikobereitschaft im mittleren Einkommensbereich, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 37 (1985) 1070–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Schneider, The effects of progressive and proportional income taxation on risk-taking, National Tax Journal 33 (1980) 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.E. Stiglitz, The effects of income, wealth, and capital gains taxation on risk-taking, Quarterly Journal of Economics 83 (1969) 263–283.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Tobin, Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk, Review of Economic Studies 25 (1957/58) 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bamberg, G., Richter, W.F. Decision-theoretic analysis of envisaged income tax reforms for FRG and USA. Ann Oper Res 16, 105–116 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283739

Keywords

Navigation