Skip to main content
Log in

On the equivalence between some discrete and continuous optimization problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The simplex algorithm for linear programming is based on the well-known equivalence between the problem of maximizing a linear functionf on a polyhedronP and the problem of maximizingf over the setV P of all vertices ofP. The equivalence between these two problems is also exploited by some methods for maximizing a convex or quasi-convex function on a polyhedron.

In this paper we determine some very general conditions under which the problem of maximizingf overP is equivalent, in some sense, to the problem of maximizingf overV P . In particular, we show that these two problems are equivalent whenf is convex or quasi-convex on all the line segments contained inP and parallel to some edge ofP.

In the case whereP is a box our results extend a well-known result of Rosenberg for 0–1 problems. Furthermore, whenP is a box or a simplex, we determine some classes of functions that can be maximized in polynomial time overP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Avriel, W.E. Diewert, S. Schaible and I. Zang,Generalized concavity (Plenum, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Brondsted,An Introduction to Convex Polytopes (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.J. Greenberg and W.P. Pierskalla, A review of quasi-convex functions, Oper. Res. 19 (1971) 1553–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Groetschel, L. Lovasz and A. Schrijver, The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization, Combinatorica 1 (1981) 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.W. Hager, P.M. Pardalos, I.M. Roussos and H.D. Sahinoglou, Active constraints in optimization, Technical report, Penn State University, Computer Science Department (1988) to appear in JOTA.

  6. P.L. Hammer and S. Rudeanu,Boolean Methods in Operations Research and Related Areas (Springer, Berlin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hansen, Methods of nonlinear 0–1 programming, Ann. Discrete Math. 5 (1979) 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Hansen, B. Jaumard and V. Mathon, Constrained nonlinear 0–1 programming, Rutgers Research Report 47-89 (1989).

  9. W.K. Hayman and P.B. KennedySubharmonic Functions, vol. 1 (Academic Press, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.G. Murty,Linear Programming (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.M. Pardalos and J.B. Rosen, Methods for global concave minimization: a bibliografic survey, SIAM Rev. 18 (1986) 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Rosenberg, 0–1 optimization and nonlinear programming, Rev. Française Inform. Recherche Operationelle 6 (1972) 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.M. Topkis, Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. 26 (1978) 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper has been partially written while the author was visiting the Rutgers Center for Operations Research (RUTCOR). The support of the Air Force grants AFORS-89-0512 and AFORS-90-0008 is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tardella, F. On the equivalence between some discrete and continuous optimization problems. Ann Oper Res 25, 291–300 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283701

Keywords

Navigation