Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 79–102 | Cite as

Violations of the independence axion in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses

  • Chris Starmer
  • Robert Sugden
Part II Behavioral Models And Empirical Findings

Keywords

Experimental Test Common Ratio Ratio Problem Independence Axion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Allais, Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole américaine, Econometrica 21(1953)503.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Bell, Regret in decision making under uncertainty, Oper. Res. 30(1982)961.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Fishburn, Nontransitive measurable utility, J. Mathematical Psychology 26(1982)31.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Fishburn, Reconsiderations in the theory of choice under uncertainty, Economic Journal 97(1987)825.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. Hagen, Towards a positive theory of preferences under risk, in:Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, ed. M. Allais and O. Hagen (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Holler, Do economics students choose rationally? A research note, Social Science Information 22(1983)623.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47(1979)263.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Loomes, Further evidence of the impact of regret and disappointment in choice under uncertainty, Economica 55(1988)47.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Loomes, When actions speak louder than prospects, Amer. Econ. Rev. 78(1988)463.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Loomes and R. Sugden, Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, Economic Journal 92(1982)805.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Loomes and R. Sugden, Testing for regret and disappointment in choice under uncertainty, Economic Journal 97(1987)118, Supplement.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Loomes and R. Sugden, Some implications of a more general form of regret theory, J. Economic Theory 41(1987)270.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. MacCrimmon and S. Larsson, Utility theory: Axioms versus “paradoxes”, in:Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, ed. M. Allais and O. Hagen (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Machina, “Expected utility” theory without the independence axiom, Econometrica 50(1982)277.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Quiggin, A theory of anticipated utility, J. Economic Behavior and Organization 3(1982)323.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Quiggin, Anticipated utility: Some developments in the economic theory of uncertainty, Ph.D. Thesis, University of New England, Australia (1986).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    C. Starmer and R. Sugden, Probability and juxtaposition effects: An experimental investigation of the common ratio effect, J. Risk and Uncertainty (1989), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 211(1981)453.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Rational choice and the framing of decisions, Journal of Business 59(1986)S251.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Yaari, The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica 55(1987)95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Starmer
    • 1
  • Robert Sugden
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economic and Social StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichU.K.

Personalised recommendations