The roots, significance, value and legislation of gambling
- 65 Downloads
In this highly personal account, Reverend Moody traces his exploration for over three decades of many facets of the underlying nature of gambling in society and in human nature. He makes the case that much of the appeal of gambling comes from the excitement of “playing with chance,” and discusses how different types of gambling — lotteries, wagering, and continuous betting — meet a variety of needs and pose diverse levels of risk to gamblers. He notes distinctions between “controlled” and “uncontrolled” gamblers, and the tendency for controlled gamblers to play on the edge and risk loss of control. He notes difficulties in preventing the excesses that can occur to individuals who gamble. He points out the problems with legislatures legalizing gambling for ulterior purposes, such as to raise tax revenue, rather than to cater to the demand for gambling from punters. This can lead to situations where commercial gaming interests are not directed to act in the best interests of the general public because potential problems that may arise with available gambling are ignored or deemphasized. Finally, he points out the tensions amongst various interest groups who deal with gambling and notes those forums which have evolved in recent years that provide greater opportunities for dialogue among the various entities who deal with gambling and public policy issues.
KeywordsPublic Policy General Public Interest Group Potential Problem Human Nature
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Clotfelter, Charles, and Philip Cook, (1989).Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, John, and E.I. Chesnick (1970). “The Doctrine of Psychological Chances”,British Journal of Psychology, pp. 323–334.Google Scholar
- Cohen, John (1960).Chance, Skill and Luck: The Psychology of Guessing and Gambling. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Harte, Bret (1896).The Writings of Bret Harte, Vol. 2, pp. 66–83. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Holroyd, F. & Collings, S. (1990). The calculated risk. In J. Dowie (ed.)Risk and rationality. Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: The Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Lorenz, Konrad (1952).King Solomon's Ring. London, Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
- Moody, Gordon E. (1985). “Playing with Chance”, in William R. Eadington (ed.),The Gambling Studies: Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Vol. 3, pp. 317–329. Reno: University of Nevada.Google Scholar
- Moody, Gordon E. (1988). “Living and Playing with Chance”, in William R. Eadington (ed.),Gambling Research: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Vol. 3, pp. 83–92. Reno: University of Nevada.Google Scholar
- Moody, Gordon E., (1990).Quit Compulsive Gambling. London: Thorsons.Google Scholar
- Moody, Gordon E., (1992). “Perspectives on Gambling”, in William R. Eadington and Judy A. Cornelius (eds.),Gambling and Commercial Gaming: Essays in Business, Economics, Philosophy and Science, pp. 441–448. Reno: Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, University of Nevada.Google Scholar