Advertisement

Systems practice

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 517–536 | Cite as

Information and the mechanistic metaphor: The place of information in organizational thought

  • Richard Kamm
Redesigning The Future
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the possibilities for extending organisational metaphors into the area of information systems. The mechanistic metaphor is used as a relevant example because analysing the assumptions behind it offers a particularly revealing insight into common assumptions in the field of management studies and information systems. These assumptions were developed in a specific historical context, that of the development of bureaucratic forms in a government and industry and the acceptance of what Weber described as “instrumental rationality.” Three elements of a characteristically mechanistic view of information management are identified: corporate ownership of information, a formal division of information work and a definition of the nature of information as data whose meaning is noncontroversial. It is argued that this view of information is too restricted to allow for creative development of information use, but that the corporate ownership of information continues to be relevant because of the notion of formal rights which has been developed from it.

Key words

information organizational metaphors information management bureaucracy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, P. (1968).Origins of British Sociology, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Albrow, M. (1970).Bureaucracy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, R. (1965).Planning and Control Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Anthony, R. and Dearden, R. (1980).Management Control Systems (4th ed.), Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, S. (1981).Brain of the Firm (2nd ed.), John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Beer, S. (1989). National government: Disseminated regulation in real time or “How to run a country.” In Espejo, R., and Harnden, R. (Eds.),The Viable Systems Model, John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  7. Beetham, D. (1987).Bureaucracy. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  8. Bendix, R. (1974).Work and Authority in Industry (2nd ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  9. Bentham, J. (1843). Panopticon. InCollected Works (Vol. 4).Google Scholar
  10. Beynon-Davies, P. (1989).Information Systems Development, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  11. Birkinshaw, P. (1988).Freedom of Information, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, P., and Scott, W. (1963).Formal Organizations, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  13. Brewer, J. (1989).The Sinews of Power, Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  14. Clegg, S. (1990).Modern Organizations, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  15. Dandeker, C. (1990).Surveillance, Power and Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, G. B., and Olson, M. H. (1985).Management Information Systems (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. DeMarco, T. (1978).Structured Analysis and System Specification, Yourdon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Deutsch, K. W. D. (1951). Mechanism, organism and society.Philosophy of Science,18, 230–252.Google Scholar
  19. Drucker, P. (1988). The coming of the new organization.Harvard Business Review, 45–53.Google Scholar
  20. Dyson, K. (1980).The State Tradition in Western Europe, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Elliot, J. H. (1984).Richlieu and Olivares, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Fayol, H. (1949).General and Industrial Management, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  23. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991).Creative Problem Solving, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  24. Flynn, D. J. (1992).Information Systems Requirements, McGraw-Hill Europe, London.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1977).Discipline and Punish, Allen Lane, London.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1980).Power/Knowledge, Colin Gordon, Harvester Press, Brighton.Google Scholar
  27. Fox, A., and Flanders, A. (1975). Collective bargaining: from Donovan to Durkheim. In Flanders (Ed.),Management and Unions, Faber and Faber, London, pp. 241–276.Google Scholar
  28. Freidman, A. (1989).Computer Systems Development, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  29. Gatrell, V. A. C. (1991). Crime, authority and the policeman-state. In Thompson, F. M. L. (Ed.),The Cambridge Social History of Britain, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, A. (1974).Positivism and Sociology, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1990).The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Hacking, I. (1975).The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Hacking, I. (1990).The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Hannah, L. (1983).The Rise of the Corporate Economy (2nd ed.), Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  35. Harrison, R. (1983).Bentham, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  36. Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development.Communications of the ACM,32, 1199–1216.Google Scholar
  37. Homans, G. (1987). Behaviourism and after. In Giddens, A., and Turner, B. S. (Eds.),Social Theory Today, Polity, Cambridge, pp. 58–81.Google Scholar
  38. Hooper, D. (1987).Official Secrets, Secker and Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  39. Ignatieff, M. (1978).A Just Measure of Pain, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  40. Johnson, H. T., and Kaplan, R. S. (1987).Relevance Lost: the Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  41. Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber's types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history.American Journal of Sociology,85, 1145–1179.Google Scholar
  42. Kast, F. E., and Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985).Organization and Management (4th ed.), McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. (1978).The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.), Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Kendall, J. E., and Kendall, K. E. (1993). Metaphors and methodologies.MIS Quarterly,17, 149–171.Google Scholar
  45. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors We Live by, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  46. Leatherdale, W. H. (1974).The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  47. Littler, C. (1982).The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  48. Loft, A. (1986). Towards a critical understanding of accounting: the case of cost accounting in the U.K., 1914–1925.Accounting, Organizations and Society,11, 137–170.Google Scholar
  49. Lyon, D. (1994).The Electronic Eye, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  50. Lyytinen, K. J., and Klein, H. K. (1985). The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Mumford, E.et al. (Eds.),Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  51. MacDonough, A. (1973), Information management. In Optner, S. (Ed.),Systems Analysis, Penguin, London, pp. 173–186.Google Scholar
  52. de Man, P. (1979). The epistemology of metaphor. In Sacks, S. (Ed.),On Metaphor, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
  53. March, J. G. (1988).Decisions and Organizations, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  54. Michael, J. (1982).The Politics of Secrecy, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  55. Mommsen, W. J. (1989).The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  56. Morgan, G. (1986).Images of Organization, Sage, Beverley Hills.Google Scholar
  57. Nichols, G. E. (1987). On the nature of management information. In Galliers, R. (Ed.),Information Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Sydney, pp. 7–17.Google Scholar
  58. Olney, R. J., and Roberts, S. G. (1982).Papers of British Cabinet Ministers 1782–1900, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  59. Perrow, C. (1986).Complex Organizations (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Petren, G. (1987). Access to government-held information in Sweden. In Marsh, N. (Ed.),Public Access to Government-Held Information, Stevens, London, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
  61. Pick, D. (1989).Faces of Degeneration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  62. Porter, T. (1986).The Rise of Statistical Thinking, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  63. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor—a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (Ed.),Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 284–324.Google Scholar
  64. Rozak, T. (1986).The Cult of Information, Lutterworth Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  65. Roslender, R. (1992).Sociological Perspectives on Modern Accountancy, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  66. Ryan, A. (1970).The Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  67. Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949).The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  68. Shennan, J. H. (1974).The Origins of the Modern European State, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  69. Sorell, T. (1991).Scientism, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  70. Smart, B. (1992).Modern Conditions, Postmodern Controversies, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  71. Stark, W. (1962).The Fundamental Forms of Social Thought, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  72. Stevenson, R. B. (1980).Corporations and Information, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  73. Tapscott, D., and Caston, A. (1993).Paradigm shift: the new promise of information technology, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Taylor, F. W. (1911).Scientific Management, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  75. Thompson, P. (1993). Postmodernism: Fatal distraction. In Hassard, J., and Parker, M. (Eds.),Postermodernism and Organizations, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  76. Toffler, A. (1985).The Adaptive Corporation, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  77. Wade, H. W. R. (1988).Administrative Law (6th ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  78. Walsham, G. (1991). Organizational metaphors and information systems research.European Journal of Information Systems,1, 83–94.Google Scholar
  79. Weber, M. (1968).Economy and Society, University of California Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  80. Winfield, I. (1991).Organisations and Information Technology, Blackwells, Oxford.Google Scholar
  81. Zuboff, S. (1988).In the Age of the Smart Machine, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Kamm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingUniversity of the West of EnglandBristol

Personalised recommendations