Abstract
Focusing on responses from 229 companies that have worked with federal laboratories, the study examines companies' objectives and initial motivations for technical interaction between companies and federal laboratories. Companies come to the federal laboratories for many reasons: some try to enhance their training and human capital, others to build precompetitive knowledge not likely to show a quick return, and still others to avail themselves of unique lab facilities or seek technical assistance. One implication of these findings is that the traditional view of technology transfer may distort the nature of commercially relevant technical interactions, particularly in an era characterized by rampant “metricmania.” Any assessment of company-laboratory interactions failing to take into account the multiple objectives of many different technical interactions is likely to hinder as much as it helps.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Berman, Evan. “Technology Transfer and the Federal Laboratories: A Midterm Assessment of Cooperative Research.”Policy Studies Journal 22 (1994): 338–349.
Bozeman, Barry. “Evaluating Government Technology Transfer: Early Impacts of the Cooperative Technology Paradigm.”Policy Studies Journal 22 (1994): 322–340.
Bozeman, Barry, and Karen Coker. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from U.S. Government R&D Laboratories: The Impact of Market Orientation.”Technovation 12, no. 4 (1992): 239–255.
Bozeman, Barry, and Michael Crow. “U.S. R&D Laboratories and Their Environments: Public and Market Influence.” Final report to the National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, Science and Engineering Indicators Program, 1988.
Bozeman, Barry, and Michael Crow. “Environments of U.S. R&D Laboratories: Political and Market Influences.”Policy Sciences 23(1990): 25–56.
Bozeman, Barry, Maria Papadakis, and Karen Coker. “Industry Perspectives on Commercial Interactions with Federal Laboratories.” Final report to the National Science Foundation, Research on Science and Technology Program, Grant #9220125, January 1995.
Brown, Marilyn A., et al. “Guidelines for Successfully Transferring Government Sponsored Innovations.”Research Policy 20, no. 2 (1987): 121–143.
Gillespie, George C. “Federal Laboratories: Economic Development and Intellectual Property Constraints.” Journal of Technology Transfer 13, no. 1 (1987): 20–26.
National Science Foundation. Research and Development in Industry: 1989. Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation, NSF92-307, 1992.
O'Keefe, T.G. “Evaluating Technology Transfer: Some Problems and Solutions.”Journal of Technology Transfer 6, no. 2 (1982): 53.
Roessner, J. David, and Alden Bean. “How Industry Interacts with Federal Laboratories.”Research Technology Management 34, no. 4 (1991): 22+.
Roessner, J. David, and Alden Bean. “Industry Interactions with Federal Laboratories.”Journal of Technology Transfer 15, no. 4 (1990): 5–14.
U.S. General Accounting Office.Technology Transfer: Implementation Status of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bozeman, B., Papadakis, M. Company interactions with federal laboratories: What they do and why they do it. J Technol Transfer 20, 64–74 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02280349
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02280349
Keywords
- Economic Growth
- Human Capital
- Technical Assistance
- Technology Transfer
- Industrial Organization