Skip to main content

Company interactions with federal laboratories: What they do and why they do it

Abstract

Focusing on responses from 229 companies that have worked with federal laboratories, the study examines companies' objectives and initial motivations for technical interaction between companies and federal laboratories. Companies come to the federal laboratories for many reasons: some try to enhance their training and human capital, others to build precompetitive knowledge not likely to show a quick return, and still others to avail themselves of unique lab facilities or seek technical assistance. One implication of these findings is that the traditional view of technology transfer may distort the nature of commercially relevant technical interactions, particularly in an era characterized by rampant “metricmania.” Any assessment of company-laboratory interactions failing to take into account the multiple objectives of many different technical interactions is likely to hinder as much as it helps.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Berman, Evan. “Technology Transfer and the Federal Laboratories: A Midterm Assessment of Cooperative Research.”Policy Studies Journal 22 (1994): 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bozeman, Barry. “Evaluating Government Technology Transfer: Early Impacts of the Cooperative Technology Paradigm.”Policy Studies Journal 22 (1994): 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozeman, Barry, and Karen Coker. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from U.S. Government R&D Laboratories: The Impact of Market Orientation.”Technovation 12, no. 4 (1992): 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bozeman, Barry, and Michael Crow. “U.S. R&D Laboratories and Their Environments: Public and Market Influence.” Final report to the National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, Science and Engineering Indicators Program, 1988.

  5. Bozeman, Barry, and Michael Crow. “Environments of U.S. R&D Laboratories: Political and Market Influences.”Policy Sciences 23(1990): 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozeman, Barry, Maria Papadakis, and Karen Coker. “Industry Perspectives on Commercial Interactions with Federal Laboratories.” Final report to the National Science Foundation, Research on Science and Technology Program, Grant #9220125, January 1995.

  7. Brown, Marilyn A., et al. “Guidelines for Successfully Transferring Government Sponsored Innovations.”Research Policy 20, no. 2 (1987): 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gillespie, George C. “Federal Laboratories: Economic Development and Intellectual Property Constraints.” Journal of Technology Transfer 13, no. 1 (1987): 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Science Foundation. Research and Development in Industry: 1989. Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation, NSF92-307, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O'Keefe, T.G. “Evaluating Technology Transfer: Some Problems and Solutions.”Journal of Technology Transfer 6, no. 2 (1982): 53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roessner, J. David, and Alden Bean. “How Industry Interacts with Federal Laboratories.”Research Technology Management 34, no. 4 (1991): 22+.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roessner, J. David, and Alden Bean. “Industry Interactions with Federal Laboratories.”Journal of Technology Transfer 15, no. 4 (1990): 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. General Accounting Office.Technology Transfer: Implementation Status of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bozeman, B., Papadakis, M. Company interactions with federal laboratories: What they do and why they do it. J Technol Transfer 20, 64–74 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02280349

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02280349

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Human Capital
  • Technical Assistance
  • Technology Transfer
  • Industrial Organization