Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 305–309 | Cite as

The electro-oculogram as an aid in the diagnosis of uveal melanoma

  • H. Brink
  • A. Pinckers
  • A. Verbeek
Article

Abstract

The electro-oculogram (EOG) in the 64 patients with a melanoma of the choroid or ciliary body was compared to the EOG in 11 patients with choroidal metastasis, 11 patients with choroidal naevi and 27 patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Using the Dt and the Lp/Dt-ratio, 87.5% of the melanomas could be diagnosed correctly whereas choroidal naevus and retinal detachment were diagnosed correctly in 72.7% and 70.4% of the cases respectively. Choroidal metastases never were classified correctly. Accompanying retinal detachment, tumour volume or a break through Bruch's membrane had no influence on the EOG in the melanoma patients. An important advantage of the method is that it can be used irrespective of the condition of the other eye. Combined with ophthalmoscopy, ultrasonography and fluorescein-angiography the EOG can be an additional aid in the differential diagnosis of malignant melanoma of the choroid and ciliary body.

Key words

uveal melanoma choroidal metastasis choroidal naevus retinal detachment electro-oculography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bohar A, Farkas A. Comparative electrophysiological observations of intraocular tumours and retinal detachment. Docum ophthalmol proc ser 1976; 10: 399–403.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    François J, De Rouck A, Machildon A. Etude de l'activité bioélectrique de la rétine dans les cas de mélanome malin de la choroide guéris par photo-coagulation. Ann d'Oculist 1966; 199: 1049–67.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graniewski-Wijnands HS, Van Lith GHM. The standing potential and its light rise in intra-ocular tumours. Docum ophthalmol proc ser 1981; 31: 106.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones RM, Klein R, De Venecia G, Myers FL. Abnormal electro-oculogram from eyes with a malignant melanoma of the choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 20: 276–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Markoff JI, Shakin E, Shields JA, Augsburger JJ. The electro-oculogram in eyes with malignant melanoma. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 1122–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pinckers A. Clinical electro-oculography. Acta ophthal (kbh) 1979; 57: 623–32.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pinckers A, Hardus P, Nabbe N. The EOG in unilateral eye disease: injuries. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983; 220: 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ponte F, Lauricella M. On the lack of correlation between ERG and EOG alterations in malignant melanoma of the choroid. Docum ophthalmol proc ser 1977; 13: 87–92.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Staman JA, Fitzgerald CR, Dawson WW, Barris MC, Hood CI. The EOG and choroidal malignant melanoma. Docum ophthalmol proc ser 1980; 49: 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thijssen JM, Pinckers A, Otto AJ. A multipurpose optical system for ophthalmic electrodiagnosis. Ophthalmologica 1974; 168: 308–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Brink
    • 1
  • A. Pinckers
    • 1
  • A. Verbeek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations