Skip to main content

Employment rejection and acceptance letters and their unintended consequences on image, self-concept, and intentions

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the positiveness and negativeness of letters of acceptance and rejection from companies have an impact on company image, self-concept of recipient, and reported future intentions of potential recruits. The implication for employers writing letters of acceptance and rejection is that they should communicate with prospective recruits in a positive manner no matter what the letter's message. Positive rejection letters can mitigate effects of rejection and negative acceptance letters can impair the positiveness of acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Campbell, Kim S. 1990. “Explanations in Negative Messages: More Insights From Speech Act Theory.”Journal of Business Communication. 27: 357–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. 1983. “Cox Report 1: If Your Corporation Were An Animal, What Animal Would It Be?”Across the Board. 20: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C.R., Jr. 1980. “Do Companies Have Personalities?”Industry Week. 205: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A.R. 1981. “Recruiting and Communications Part Two: Beyond Advertising.”Journal of College Placement. XLI: 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, R., J. Meoli, T. Snuggs, and L. Levandowski 1985. “Rejection Letters and Retail Corporate Image.” InRetailing. Theory and Practice for the 21st Century. Ed. R. King. Charleston, West Virginia: Academy of Marketing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J.S. and R. Dulek 1982. “What Rejection Letters Say About Your Company.”Business Horizons. 25: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. and L. Smeltzer 1985. “Corporate Image—An Integral Part of Strategy.”Sloan Management Review 26: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagge, J. 1989. “The Spurious Paternity of Business Communication Principles.”Journal of Business Communication. 26: 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E., D. Kanouse, H. Kelley, R. Nesbett, S. Valins, and B. Werner 1972.Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. New Jersey: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, M.L. 1979. “Remedy for a Poor Organizational Image.”S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal. 44: 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancill, J.M. 1984. “Upgrade Your Company's Image-and Valuation.”Harvard Business Review. 62: 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C., Wilkinson, D., & Vik, G. 1986.Communicating Through Writing and Speaking in Business. 9th Edition. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchester, R. 1972. “Corporate Image Research.” InConsumer Marketing Research Handbook. Ed. R. Worchester. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially supported by Grant #82037 from the Purdue Agricultural Research Station. Reprints should be addressed to Dr. Richard Feinberg, Department of Consumer Sciences and Retailing, Purdue University, 1262 Matthews Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1262.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feinberg, R.A., Meoli-Stanton, J. & Gable, M. Employment rejection and acceptance letters and their unintended consequences on image, self-concept, and intentions. J Bus Psychol 11, 63–71 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278256

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278256

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Social Issue
  • Unintended Consequence
  • Positive Manner
  • Future Intention