Summary
This study examined the ecology and interaction ofAzospirillum brasilense and its bacteriophage in soil. Four Chernozemic soils from Canada, a Latosol and three Podzolic soils from Brazil were assayed for phage. Only the Latosol containedA. brasilense phage. None of the soils contained phage for otherA. brasilense orA. lipoferum strains tested. Recovery of phage from soil depended on the growth of indigenous or added host cells. A phage isolated from the Latosol had a hexagonal head of 100 nm and a tail of 200 nm. This phage was morphologically distinct from previously described Azospirillum phage and its host range was limited toA. brasilense strains 29145 and 29711.
Survival and recovery of phage added to phage-free soil was dependent on the phage, the initial phage population, the presence of host cells and nutrients, and the soil. Phage persisted in soils at undetectable levels for at least seven weeks, but were still able to interact with multiplying host cells and exhibit a 1000-fold increase in number. Phage required a host cell population of at least 100–1000 per g of soil in order to multiply. The phage burst detected under these conditions increased as the cell to phage ratio increased. Long term incubation studies showed that the activity of phage in soil closely followed the activity of host cells and thus both were manipulated by appropriate amendments to soil.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams M H 1959 Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.
Bradley D E 1967 Ultrastructure of bacteriophages and bacteriocins. Bacteriol. Rev. 31, 230–314.
Day J M and Döbereiner J 1976 Physiological aspects of N2-fixation by aSpirillum fromDigitaria roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 45–50.
Döbereiner J, Marriel I E and Nery M 1976 Ecological distribution ofSpirillum lipoferum Beijerinck. Can. J. Microbiol. 22, 1464–1473.
Elmerich C, Quiviger B, Rosenberg C, Franche C, Laurent P and Döbereiner J 1982 Characterization of a temperate bacteriophage forAzospirillum. Virology 122, 29–37.
Eskew D L, Focht D D and Ting I P 1977 Nitrogen fixation, denitrification and pleomorphic growth in a highly pigmentedSpirillum lipoferum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34, 582–585.
Franche C and Elmerich C 1981 Physiological properties and plasmid content of several strains ofAzospirillum brasilense andA. lipoferum. Ann. Microbiol. (Paris) 132A, 3–18.
Germida J J 1984 Spontaneous induction of bacteriophage during growth ofAzospirillum brasilense in complex media. Can. J. Microbiol. 30, 805–808.
Germida J J 1984 Interaction of bacteriophage and their host bacteria in soil.In 1984 Annual Meetings; Canadian Society of Microbiologists, Absts. p. 80.
Germida J J and Casida L E Jr 1981 Isolation ofArthrobacter bacteriophage from soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41, 1389–1393.
Germida J J and Casida L E Jr 1983Ensifer adhaerens predatory activity against other bacteria in soil, as monitored by indirect phage analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1380–1388.
Kosslak R M and Bohlool B B 1983 Prevalence ofAzospirillum spp. in the rhizosphere of tropical plants. Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 649–652.
Lanning S and Williams S T 1982 Methods for the direct isolation and enumeration of actinophages in soil. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128, 2063–2071.
Lin W, Okon Y and Hardy R W F 1983 Enhanced mineral uptake byZea mays andSorghum bicolor roots inoculated withAzospirillum brasilense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1775–1779.
Nelson D W and Sommers L E 1982 Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. pp 539–579.In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2 nd Ed. Eds A L Page et al., Agronomy 9, Am. Soc. of Agron., Madison, WI.
Patriquin D G, Döbereiner J and Jain D K 1982 Sites and processes of association between diazotrophs and grasses. Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 900–915.
Reanney D C and Marsh S C N 1973 The ecology of viruses attackingBacillus stearothermophilus in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 399–408.
Schiffenbauer M and Stotzky G 1982 Adsorption of coliphages T1 and T7 to clay minerals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 590–596.
Smith R L, Schank S C, Milam J R and Baltensperger A A 1984 Responses ofSorgum andPennisetum to the N2-fixing bacteriumAzospirillum brasilense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 1331–1336.
Sykes I K, Lanning S and Williams S T 1981 The effect of pH on soil actinophage. J. Gen. Microbiol. 122, 271–280.
Sykes I K and Williams S T 1978 Interactions of actinophages and clays. J. Gen. Microbiol. 108, 97–102.
Tan J S H and Reanney D C 1976 Interactions between bacteriophages and bacteria in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 145–150.
Tarrand J J, Krieg N R and Döbereiner J 1978 A taxonomic study of theSpirillum lipoferum group, with descriptions of a new genus,Azospirillum gen. nov. and two species,Azospirillum lipoferum (Beijerinck) comb. nov. andAzospirillum brasilense sp. nov. Can. J. Microbiol. 24, 967–980.
Thomas-Bauzon D, Weinhard P, Villecourt P and Balandreau J 1982 The spermosphere model. I. Its use in growing, counting, and isolating N2-fixing bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice. Can. J. Microbiol. 28, 922–928.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Germida, J.J. Population dynamics ofAzospirillum brasilense and its bacteriophage in soil. Plant Soil 90, 117–128 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277391
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277391