Summary
Optimum conditions for the separation of 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate derivatized catecholamines by HPLC are described; three catecholamines (noradrenaline, adrenaline and dopamine) and an internal standard (epinine) were separated in less than 20 minutes under isocratic conditions. This method is 17 to 350 times more sensitive than electrochemical detection, depending on the test compounds. It has been applied to the analysis of catecholamines in urine. The sample was extracted by a metal-loaded silica prior to separation.
References
B. Kågedal, D. S. Goldstein, J. Chromatogr.,429, 177 (1988).
J. A. Huth, P. L. Bottjen, C. W. Ludvigsen, Clin. Biochem.,19, 221 (1986).
K. Imai, M. Tsukamoto, Z. Tamara, J. Chromatogr.,137, 357 (1977).
P. M. Froehlich, T. D. Cunningham, Anal. Chim. Acta,97, 357 (1978).
K. Mori, in “Quantitative Analysis of Catecholamines and Related Compounds”. Ed.A. M. Krustulovic, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, 1986.
L. A. Carpino, G. Y. Han, J. Org. Chem.,37, 4304 (1972).
S. Einarsson, B. Josefsson, S. Lagerkvist, J. Chromatogr.,282, 609 (1983).
S. Einarsson, S. Folestad, B. Josefsson, S. Lagerkvist, Anal. Chem.,58, 1638 (1986).
A. A. Descombes, J. L. Veuthey, W. Haerdi, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem.339 480, (1991).
P. Ni, F. Guyon, M. Caude, R. Rosset, Analusis,16 (9–10), 484 (1988).
C. J. Shahwan, J. R. Jezorek, J. Chromatogr.,256, 39 (1983).
A. A. Descombes, W. Haerdi, Chromatographia,28, 459 (1989).
D. Sanchez, P. Miller, S. Einarsson, B. Josefsson, Janssen Chimica Acta,6, 10 (1988).
P. Hušek, J. Maliková, G. Herzogová, J. Chromatogr.,533, 166 (1990).
Documenta Geigy, “Tables scientifiques” JR. Geigy SA, Basle. 6th ed., 1963, p. 739.
A. A. Descombes, W. Haerdi, Chimica,42, 301 (1988).
A. Coquet, A. A. Descombes, J. L. Veuthey, W. Haerdi, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem.,339, 475 (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Descombes, A.A., Haerdi, W. HPLC separation of catecholamines after derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate. Chromatographia 33, 83–86 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276857
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276857