Skip to main content
Log in

Psychotherapy and the locus of control

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Underlying various actions of both the therapist and the patient are expectations about the measure to which an individual's experiences are the product of powerful external forces or of the person's own actions and decisions. While most of our anthropological theories support the notion that a person's experience is subject to an external locus of control, neither that view nor the opposite emphasizing freedom and autonomy is adequate for the therapeutic enterprise. THere are elements of truth in both positions that ned to be incorporated in therapeutic expectations if the enterprise is to proceed in an orderly fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rotter, J.B., “Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Locus of Control of Reinforcement”,Psychological Monographs General-Applied, 1966,80, (1,Whole No. 609), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perls, F.,Geltalt Therapy Verbatim. Lafayette, California, Real People Press, 1969, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mosak, H., and Dreikurs, R., “Adlerian Psychology”. In Corsini, R., ed.,Current Psychotherapies, Itasca, Illinois, Peacock, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A. “Behavior Theory and the Models of Man”,American Psychologist, 1974,29, 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arieti, S.,The Will to be Human. New York, Quandrangle, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, D.; James, R.E.; and Reeves, G., eds.,Process Philosophy and Christian Thought. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1971; Cobb, J.B., and Griffin, D.R.,Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Wolf, F.A.,Taking the Quantum Leap. San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1981. Particularly helpful discussions of the relationship between science and religion in the post-Darwinian, post-Einsteinian era are to be found in the writings of Barbour, I.G.,Issues in Science and Religion. New York, Harper & Row, 1966; andMyths, Models, and Paradigms. New York, Harper & Row, 1974; Peacocke, A.R.,Science and the Christian Experiment. London, Oxford University Press, 1971; andCreation and the World of Science. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erickson, R., “The Vulnerable Hero: Theology and the Goals of Therapy”,J. Religion and Health. 1973,12, 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erickson, R., “Viewing the Therapeutic Community through Adlerian Spectacles”International J. Group Psychotherapy. In Press.

  10. “Reconciling Christian Views of Sin and Human Growth with Humanistic Psychology”,Christian Scholars Review, 1978,8, 114–125. An excellent selection of St. Irenaeus's writing is to be found in Bettenson, H., ed.,The Early Christian Fathers. London. Oxford University Press, 1969.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erickson, R.C. Psychotherapy and the locus of control. J Relig Health 22, 74–81 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276772

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276772

Keywords

Navigation