Landscape Ecology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 19–28 | Cite as

Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern

  • Robert H. Gardner
  • Bruce T. Milne
  • Monica G. Turnei
  • Robert V. O'Neill


The relationship between a landscape process and observed patterns can be rigorously tested only if the expected pattern in the absence of the process is known. We used methods derived from percolation theory to construct neutral landscape models,i.e., models lacking effects due to topography, contagion, disturbance history, and related ecological processes. This paper analyzes the patterns generated by these models, and compares the results with observed landscape patterns. The analysis shows that number, size, and shape of patches changes as a function of p, the fraction of the landscape occupied by the habitat type of interest, and m, the linear dimension of the map. The adaptation of percolation theory to finite scales provides a baseline for statistical comparison with landscape data. When USGS land use data (LUDA) maps are compared to random maps produced by percolation models, significant differences in the number, size distribution, and the area/perimeter (fractal dimension) indices of patches were found. These results make it possible to define the appropriate scales at which disturbance and landscape processes interact to affect landscape patterns.


scale resolution fractals percolation theory landscape pattern 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bormann, F.H. and Likens, G.E. 1979. Catastrophic disturbance and the steady state in northern hardwood forests. Amer Sci., 67: 660–669Google Scholar
  3. Burgess, R.L. and Sharpe, D.M. (eds.) 1981. Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Burrough, P.A. 1983. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. J. Soil Sci. 34: 577–597.Google Scholar
  5. Caswell, H. 1976. Community structure: a neutral model analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 327–354.Google Scholar
  6. Fegas, R.G., Claire, R.W., Guptill, S.C., Andersons K.E. and Hallam, C.A. 1983. Land use and land cover digital data. Geological Survey Circular 895-E, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Gefen, Y., Aharony, A. and Alexander, S. 1983. Anomalous diffusion on percolating clusters. Physical Rev. Lett. 50: 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.Google Scholar
  10. Mandelbrot, B.B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Meentemeyer, V. and Box, E.O. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies.In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. pp. 15–33. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Milne, B.T. In press, (a). Hierarchical Landscape Structure and the Forest Planning Model: Discussant's Comments. U.S. Forest Forest Service.Google Scholar
  13. Milne, B.T. In press, (b). Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Applied Mathematics and Computation.Google Scholar
  14. Orbach, R. 1986. Dynamics of fractal networks. Science 231: 814–819.Google Scholar
  15. Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  16. Shugart, H.H. and West, D.C. 1981. Long-term dynamics of forest systems. Amer. Sci. 69: 647–652.Google Scholar
  17. Stauffer, D. 1985. Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
  18. Turner, M.G. 1987a. Land use changes and net primary production in the Georgia, USA, Landscape: 1935–82. Environ. Manage. 11: 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Turner, M.G., ed. 1987b. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SPB Academic Publishing 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Gardner
    • 1
  • Bruce T. Milne
    • 2
  • Monica G. Turnei
    • 3
  • Robert V. O'Neill
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  3. 3.Institute of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations