Skip to main content
Log in

The religious physician

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to understand what it means to be a physician, we must, according to Dr. Edmund Pellegrino, analyze four words that capture the essence of the medical enterprise: profession, patient, compassion, and consent. The resultant model provides a rational and secular basis upon which the Jewish or Christian physician can then build an understanding of medicine in its peculiarly religious form. This religious form is likewise characterized by four words: vocation, neighbor, love, and covenant. An analysis of these words provides a model of and for the religious physician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pellegrino, E., “The Fact of Illness and the Act of Profession: Some Notes on the Source of Professional Obligation.” In McCullough, L. B. and Norris, J.P., eds.,Implications of History and Ethics to Medicine Veterinary and Human. College Station, Texas A&M University, 1978, pp. 78–89; “To Be a Physician”,Humanism and the Physician, Knoxville, University of Tennessee Press, 1979, pp. 222–230; “Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality: The Primacy of the Act of Profession and the Fact of Illness,”J. Medicine and Philosophy, 1979,4, 32–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, “To Be a Physician”,op. citHumanism and the Physician, Knoxville, University of Tennessee Press, 1979, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amundsen, D. W., “Casuistry and Professional Obligations: The Regulation of Physicians by the Court of Conscience in the Late Middle Ages. Part I,”Transactions and Studies. The College of Physicians of Philadelphia, 1981, Series V,3, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ——Ibid., p. 37. See also Amundsen, D.W., “Casuistry and Professional Obligations The Regulation of Physicians by the Court of Conscience in the Late Middle Ages. Part II,”loc. cit., Transactions and Studies. The College of Physicians of Philadelphia, 1981, Series V,3, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pellegrino, “The Fact of Illness and the Act of Pro-Fession: Some Notes on the Source of Professional Obligation,” ——op. cit. In, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On the concept of malady see Clouser, K.D.; Culver, C.M.; and Gert, B., “Malady: A New Treatment of Disease,”The Hastings Center Report, 1981,11, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barth, K.,Church Dogmatics, vol. 1/2, trans. G.T. Thomas and H. Knight. New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1956, pp. 414–430.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nygren, A.,Agape and Eros, trans. P.S. Watson. New York, Harper and Row, 1969, pp. 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hillers, D.R.,Covenant: The History of a Biblical Idea. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. May, W., “Code and Covenant or Philanthropy and Contract?” In Reiser, S.J.; Dyck, A.J.; and Curran, W.J. eds.,Ethics in Medicine: Historical and Contemporary Concerns. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1977, pp. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roth, W., and Reuther, R.,The Liberating Bond: Covenants Biblical and Contemporary. New York, The Friendship Press, 1978, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. May, ——op. cit.,“, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —, pp. 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sevensky, R.L. The religious physician. J Relig Health 21, 254–263 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274185

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274185

Keywords

Navigation