Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 5, Issue 7, pp 413–414 | Cite as

Relative molar response of flame lonisation detector to some heteroaromatic compounds

  • S. Clementi
  • G. Savelli
  • M. Vergoni
Short Communications

Summary

The “effective carbon number”* of heteroaromatic compounds determined by FID was found to be one unit smaller than expected. Such a result does not depend on the nature of the heteroatom. An analogous decrease is caused by the presence of a quaternary carbon atom as in a terbutyl group.

Keywords

Analytical Chemistry Organic Chemistry Carbon Atom Carbon Number Quaternary Carbon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Relative molare empfindlichkeit des Flammenionisationsdetektors für einige heteroaromatische Verbindungen

Réponses molaires relatives de détecteur à ionisation de flamme à quelques composés hétérocycliques

References

  1. [1]
    P. Linda andG. Marino, Tetrahedron,23, 1739 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Clementi andG. Marino, Tetrahedron,25, 4599 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Clementi, P. Linda, andM. Vergoni, Tetrahedron,27, 4667 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Clementi, andG. Marino, J. C. S. PerkinII, 71 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. B. Littlewood, “Gas Chromatography” II nd. ed., Academic Press, New York, 1970, p. 306.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Bruderreck, W. Schneider, andI. Halász, Anal. Chem.,36, 461 (1964).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. A. Andreatch andR. Feinland, Anal. Chem.32, 1021 (1960).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Halász andW. Schneider, Anal. Chem.,33, 979 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. S. Ettre, J. Chromatog.,8, 525 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. S. Ettre andF. J. Kabot, J. Chromatog.,11, 114 (1963).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Perkins, R. E. Laramy, andL. D. Lively, Anal. Chem.,35, 360 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. G. Ackman andJ. C. Sipos, J. Chromatog.,16, 298 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. G. Ackman, J. Gas Chromatog.2, (6), 173 (1964).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. A. Dietz, J. Gas Chromatog.,5 (2) 68 (1967).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Hainova, P. Bocek, J. Novak, andJ. J. Janak, J. Gas Chromatog.,5, 401 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. G. Ackman, J. Gas Chromatog.,6, 497 (1968).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ya. L. Gol'dfarb, V. I. Yakerson, V. A. Ferantopov, S. Z. Taits, andF. M. Stoyanovich, ‘Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Heterocyclic Compounds” inA. R. Katritzky “Physical Methods in Heterocyclic Chemistry” Academic Press, New York, 1971, vol. III, p. 297.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Clementi andG. Marino, Ricerca Sci.,37, 418 (1967).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. Linda andG. Marino, Ricerca Sci.,37, 424 (1967).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Linda andG. Marino, J. Chem. Soc. (B),43 (1970).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    F. Fringuelli, G. Marino, G. Savelli andA. Taticchi, Chem. Commun.1441 (1971).Google Scholar
  22. [23]
    R. J. Maggs, Column,1 (2), 1 (1966); Chem. Abstr., 67, 39937 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn GmbH 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Clementi
    • 1
  • G. Savelli
    • 1
  • M. Vergoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Chimica OrganicaUniversità di PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations