Chromatographia

, Volume 5, Issue 7, pp 413–414 | Cite as

Relative molar response of flame lonisation detector to some heteroaromatic compounds

  • S. Clementi
  • G. Savelli
  • M. Vergoni
Short Communications

Summary

The “effective carbon number”* of heteroaromatic compounds determined by FID was found to be one unit smaller than expected. Such a result does not depend on the nature of the heteroatom. An analogous decrease is caused by the presence of a quaternary carbon atom as in a terbutyl group.

Keywords

Analytical Chemistry Organic Chemistry Carbon Atom Carbon Number Quaternary Carbon 

Relative molare empfindlichkeit des Flammenionisationsdetektors für einige heteroaromatische Verbindungen

Réponses molaires relatives de détecteur à ionisation de flamme à quelques composés hétérocycliques

References

  1. [1]
    P. Linda andG. Marino, Tetrahedron,23, 1739 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Clementi andG. Marino, Tetrahedron,25, 4599 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Clementi, P. Linda, andM. Vergoni, Tetrahedron,27, 4667 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Clementi, andG. Marino, J. C. S. PerkinII, 71 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. B. Littlewood, “Gas Chromatography” II nd. ed., Academic Press, New York, 1970, p. 306.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Bruderreck, W. Schneider, andI. Halász, Anal. Chem.,36, 461 (1964).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. A. Andreatch andR. Feinland, Anal. Chem.32, 1021 (1960).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Halász andW. Schneider, Anal. Chem.,33, 979 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. S. Ettre, J. Chromatog.,8, 525 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. S. Ettre andF. J. Kabot, J. Chromatog.,11, 114 (1963).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Perkins, R. E. Laramy, andL. D. Lively, Anal. Chem.,35, 360 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. G. Ackman andJ. C. Sipos, J. Chromatog.,16, 298 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. G. Ackman, J. Gas Chromatog.2, (6), 173 (1964).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. A. Dietz, J. Gas Chromatog.,5 (2) 68 (1967).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Hainova, P. Bocek, J. Novak, andJ. J. Janak, J. Gas Chromatog.,5, 401 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. G. Ackman, J. Gas Chromatog.,6, 497 (1968).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ya. L. Gol'dfarb, V. I. Yakerson, V. A. Ferantopov, S. Z. Taits, andF. M. Stoyanovich, ‘Gas-Liquid Chromatography of Heterocyclic Compounds” inA. R. Katritzky “Physical Methods in Heterocyclic Chemistry” Academic Press, New York, 1971, vol. III, p. 297.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Clementi andG. Marino, Ricerca Sci.,37, 418 (1967).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. Linda andG. Marino, Ricerca Sci.,37, 424 (1967).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Linda andG. Marino, J. Chem. Soc. (B),43 (1970).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    F. Fringuelli, G. Marino, G. Savelli andA. Taticchi, Chem. Commun.1441 (1971).Google Scholar
  22. [23]
    R. J. Maggs, Column,1 (2), 1 (1966); Chem. Abstr., 67, 39937 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn GmbH 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Clementi
    • 1
  • G. Savelli
    • 1
  • M. Vergoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Chimica OrganicaUniversità di PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations