Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 482–499 | Cite as

Annual plant life histories and the paradigm of resource allocation

  • Gordon A. Fox

Summary

Much of life history theory follows from the idea that natural selection acts on the allocation of resources to competing and independent demographic functions. This paradigm has stimulated much research on the life histories of annual plants. Models of whole-plant resource budgets that use optimal control theory predict periods of 100% vegetative and 100% reproductive growth, sometimes with periods of mixed growth. I show here that this prediction follows from the assumption of independence of the competing ‘vegetative’ and ‘reproductive’ compartments. The prediction is qualitatively unchanged even after relaxing important simplifying assumptions used in most models. Although it follows naturally from the assumptions of the models, this kind of allocation pattern is unlikely to occur in many plants, because it requires that (1) leaf and flower buds can never simultaneously be carbon sinks; and (2) organs that accompany flowers, such as internodes and bracts, can never be net sources of photosynthate. Thus while resources are doubtless important for annual plants, an exclusively resource-based perspective may be inadequate to understand the evolution of their life histories. Progress in research may require models that incorporate, or are at least phenomenologically consistent with, the basic developmental reles of angiosperms.

Keywords

life history evolution phenology optimal control theory modularity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, W. G. (1979) Patterns of resource allocation in wildflower populations of fields and woods.Am. J. Bot. 66, 71–9.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, W. G. and Caswell, H. (1982) On the comparative allocation of biomass, energy, and nutrients in plants.Ecology 63, 982–91.Google Scholar
  3. Akin, E. (1979)The Geometry of Population Genetics. Springer-Verlag, NY (Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 21), USA.Google Scholar
  4. Battey, N. H. and Lyndon, R. F. (1990) Reversion of flowering.Bot. Rev. 56, 162–89.Google Scholar
  5. Bazzaz, F. A., Carlson, R. W. and Harper, J. L. (1979) Contribution to the reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits.Nature 279, 554–5.Google Scholar
  6. Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D. and Pitelka, L. F. (1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defense.Bioscience 37, 58–67.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, A. D. and Tomlinson, P. B. (1980) Adaptive architecture in rhizomatous plants.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80, 125–60.Google Scholar
  8. Bernier, G. (1966) The morphogenetic role of the apical meristem in higher plants. InLes Phytohomones et l'Organogenèse (Congrès international tenu a l'Université de Liège) pp. 151–211. Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
  9. Bryson, A. E., Jr. and Ho, Y. C. (1975)Applied Optimal Control. Hemisphere, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Charles-Edwards, D. A., Cockshull, K. E. and Thornley, J. H. M. (1978) A model of flowering inChrysanthemum.Ann. Bot. 44, 557–66.Google Scholar
  11. Charlesworth, B. and León, J. A. (1976) The relation of reproductive effort to age.Am. Nat. 110, 449–59.Google Scholar
  12. Chiariello, N. R., Mooney, H. A. and Williams, K. (1989) Growth, carbon allocation and cost of plant tissues. InPlant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation (R. W. Pearcy, J. Ehleringer, H. A. Mooney, and P. W. Rundel, eds). pp. 327–65. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Chiariello, N. and Roughgarden, J. D. (1984) Storage allocation in seasonal races of an annual plant: optimalversus actual allocation.Ecology 65, 1290–301.Google Scholar
  14. Cody, M. (1966) A general theory of clutch size.Evolution 20, 174–84.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, D. (1971) Maximizing final yield when growth is limited by time or by limiting resources.J. Theor. Biol. 33, 299–307.Google Scholar
  16. Cook, R. E. (1979) Asexual reproduction: a further consideration.Am. Nat. 113, 769–72.Google Scholar
  17. Denholm, J. V. (1975) Necessary condition for maximum yield in a senescing two-phase plant.J. Theor. Biol. 52, 251–4.Google Scholar
  18. Esau, K. (1977)Anatomy of Seed Plants. 2nd edn, Wiley, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Evenson, W. E. (1983) Experimental studies of reproductive energy allocation in plants. InHandbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (C. E. Jones and R. J. Little, eds). pp. 249–74. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher, R. A. (1930)The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Fox, G. A. (1989) Consequences of flowering time in a desert annual: adaptation and history.Ecology 70, 1294–306.Google Scholar
  22. Fox, G. A. (1990) Components of flowering-time variation in a desert annual.Evolution 44, 1404–23.Google Scholar
  23. Fox, G. A. (1992) The effect of time-varying mortality, carbon assimilation, and plant allometry on models of carbon allocation in annual plants.Evol. Ecol. 6, 500–18.Google Scholar
  24. Gadgil, M., and Bossert, W. H. (1970) Life historical consequences of natural selection.Am. Nat. 104, 1–24.Google Scholar
  25. Gadgil, S. and Gadgil, M. (1975) Can a single resource support many consumer species?J. Genet. 62, 33–47.Google Scholar
  26. Geber, M. R. (1990) The cost of meristem limitation inPolygonum arenastrum: negative genetic correlations between fecundity and growth.Evolution 44, 799–819.Google Scholar
  27. Goodman, D. (1979) Regulating reproductive effort in a hanginge environment.Am. Nat. 113, 735–48.Google Scholar
  28. Goodman, D. (1982) Optimal life histories, optimal notation, and the value of reproductive value.Am. Nat. 119, 803–23.Google Scholar
  29. Green, P. B., and Poethig, R. S. (1982) Biophysics of the extension and initiation of plant organs. InDevelopmental Order: its Origin and Regulation (S. Subtelny and P. B. Green, eds). pp. 485–509. Alan R. Liss, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Harper, J. L. and Ogden, J. (1970) The reproductive strategy of higher plants. I. The concept of strategy with special reference toSenecio vulgaris L.J. Ecol. 58, 681–98.Google Scholar
  31. Hastings, A. (1981) Stable cycling in discrete-time genetic models.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 11, 7224–5.Google Scholar
  32. Hickman, J. C. (1975) Environmental unpredictability and plastic energy allocation strategies in the annualPolygonum cascadense (Polygonaceae).J. Ecol. 63, 689–701.Google Scholar
  33. Hickman, J. C. and Pitelka, L. F. (1975) Dry weight indicates energy allocation in ecological strategy analysis of plants.Oecol. (Berlin)221, 117–21.Google Scholar
  34. Hofbauer, J. and Sigmund, K. (1988)The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press (London Mathematical Society Student Texts 7), Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Hom, C. L. (1987) Control theory predictions of reproductive allocation in female dusky salamanders.J. Math. Biol. 25, 289–306.Google Scholar
  36. Hom, C. L. (1988) Optimal reproductive allocation in female dusky salamanders: a quantitative test.Am. Nat. 131, 71–90.Google Scholar
  37. Hom, C. L. (1992) Modelling reproductive allocation of dusky salamanders using optimal control theory: pros, cons, and caveats.Evol. Ecol. 6, 458–81.Google Scholar
  38. Inouye, R. S. (1991) Population biology of desert annual plants. InThe Ecology of Desert Communities (G. A. Polis, ed.). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Iwasa, Y. and Cohen, D. (1989) Optimal growth schedule of a perennial plant.Am. Nat. 133, 480–505Google Scholar
  40. Iwasa, Y. and Roughgarden, J. (1984) Shoot/root balance of plants: optimal growth of a system with many vegetative organs.Theor. Pop. Biol. 25, 78–105.Google Scholar
  41. Kawano, S. (1981) Trade-off relationships between some reproductive characteristics in plants with special reference to life history strategy.Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)94, 285–94.Google Scholar
  42. Kawano, S. 1985. Life history characteristics of temperate woodland plants in Japan. InThe Population Structure of Vegetation (J. White, ed.) pp. 515–49. Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  43. King, D. and Roughgarden, J. (1982a) Multiple switches between vegetative and reproductive growth in annual plants.Theor. Pop. Biol. 21, 194–204.Google Scholar
  44. King, D. and Roughgarden, J. (1982b) Graded allocation between vegetative and reproductive growth for annual plants in growing seasons of random length.Theor. Pop. Biol. 22, 1–16.Google Scholar
  45. King, D. and Roughgarden, J. (1983) Energy allocation patterns of the California grassland annualsPlantago erecta andClarkia rubicunda.Ecology 64, 16–24.Google Scholar
  46. King, R. W. (1981) The shoot apex in transition: flowers and other organs. InThe Growth and Functioning of Leaves (J. E. Dale and F. L. Milthorpe, eds) pp. 109–44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  47. Klinkhammer, P. G. L., de Jong, T. J. and Meelis, E. (1990) How to test for proportionality in the reproductive effort of plants.Am. Nat. 135, 291–300.Google Scholar
  48. Kozlowski, J. and Wiegert, R. G. (1986) Optimal allocation of energy to growth and reproduction.Theor. Pop. Biol. 29, 16–37.Google Scholar
  49. Kozlowski, J. and Ziólko, M. (1988) Gradual transition from vegetative to reproductive growth is optimal when the maximum rate of reproductive growth is limited.Theor. Pop. Biol. 34, 118–29.Google Scholar
  50. León, J. A. (1976) Life histories as adaptive strategies.J. Theor. Biol. 60, 301–36.Google Scholar
  51. Lovett Doust, J. (1980) A comparative study of life history and resource allocation in selected Umbelliferae.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13, 139–54.Google Scholar
  52. Lyndon, R. F. (1977) Interacting processes in vegetative development and in the transition to flowering at the shoot apex.Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 31, 221–50.Google Scholar
  53. Macevicz, S., and Oster, G. (1978) Modelling social insect populations. II. Optimal reproductive strategies in annual eusocial insect colonies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1, 265–82.Google Scholar
  54. Maillette, L. (1990) The value of meristem states, as estimated by a discrete Markov chain.Oikos 59, 235–40.Google Scholar
  55. Michod, R. H. (1979) Evolution of life histories in response to age-specific mortality factors.Am. Nat. 113, 531–50.Google Scholar
  56. Mirmirani, M. and Oster, G. (1978) Competition, kin selection, and evolutionary stable strategies.Theor. Pop. Biol. 13, 304–39.Google Scholar
  57. Niklas, K. J. (1989) Safety factors in vertical stems: evidence fromEquisetum hymendale.Evolution 43, 1625–36.Google Scholar
  58. Niklas, K. J., and Kerchner, V. (1984) Mechanical and photosynthetic constraints on the evolution of plant shape.Paleobiology 10, 79–101.Google Scholar
  59. Niklas, K. J. and O'Rourke, T. D. (1982) Growth patterns of plants that maximize vertical growth and minimize internal stresses.Am. J. Bot. 75, 1516–25.Google Scholar
  60. Ogden, J. (1974) The reproductive strategy of higher plants. II. The reproductive strategy ofTussilago farfara L.J. Ecol. 62, 291–324.Google Scholar
  61. Paltridge, G. W. and Denholm, J. V. (1974) Plant yield and the switch from vegetative to reproductive growth.J. Theor. Biol. 44, 23–34.Google Scholar
  62. Penning de Vries, F. W. T., Brunsting, A. H. M. and van Laar, H. H. (1974) Products, requirements, and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach.J. Theor. Biol. 45, 339–77.Google Scholar
  63. Pitelka, L. F. (1977) Energy allocation in annual and perennial lupines (Lupinus: Leguminosae).Ecology 58, 1055–65.Google Scholar
  64. Poethig, R. S. (1990) Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants.Science 250, 923–30.Google Scholar
  65. Primack, R. B. (1979) Reproductive effort in annual and perennial species ofPlantago (Plantaginaceae).Am. Nat. 114, 51–62.Google Scholar
  66. Rathcke, B. and Lacey, E. P. (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 179–214Google Scholar
  67. Reekie, E. G. and Bazzaz, F. A. (1987) Reproductive effort in plants. I. Carbon allocation to reproduction.Am. Nat. 129, 876–96.Google Scholar
  68. Ricklefs, R. (1977) On the evolution of reproductive strategies in birds: reproductive effort.Am. Nat. 111, 453–78.Google Scholar
  69. Samson, D. A. and Werk, K. S. (1986) Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants.Am. Nat. 127, 667–80.Google Scholar
  70. Schaffer, W. M. (1974a) Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure.Ecology 55, 291–303.Google Scholar
  71. Schaffer, W. M. (1974b) Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments.Am. Nat. 108, 783–90.Google Scholar
  72. Schaffer, W. M. (1977) Some observations on the evolution of reproductive rate and copetitive ability in flowering plants.Theor. Pop. Biol. 11, 90–104.Google Scholar
  73. Schaffer, W. M. (1983) The application of optimal control theory to the general life history problem.Am. Nat. 121, 418–31.Google Scholar
  74. Schaffer, W. M., Inouye, R. S. and Whittam, T. S. (1982) Energy allocation by an annual plant when the effects of seasonality on growth and reproduction are decoupled.Am. Nat. 120, 787–815.Google Scholar
  75. Schaffer, W. M. and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1977) Selection for optimal life histories. II: multiple equilibria and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies.Ecology 58, 60–72.Google Scholar
  76. Schat, H., Ouborg, J. and de Wit, R. (1989) Life history and plant architecture: size-dependent reproductive allocation in annual and biennialCentaurium species.Acta Bot. Neerl. 38, 183–201.Google Scholar
  77. Silvertown, J. (1983) Why are biennials sometimes not so few?Am. Nat. 121, 448–53.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, B. H. (1984) The optimal design of a herbaceous body.Am. Nat. 123, 197–211.Google Scholar
  79. Southwick, E. E. (1984) Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: a neglected energy investment.Ecology 65, 1775–9.Google Scholar
  80. Steeves, T. A. and Sussex, I. M. (1989) Patterns in plant development. 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  81. Tateno, M. and Watanabe, N. (1988) Optimal growth schedule of deciduous tree seedlings.Funct. Ecol. 2 89–96.Google Scholar
  82. Thompson, K. and Stewart, A. J. A. (1981) The measurement and meaning of reproductive effort in plants.Am. Nat. 117, 205–11.Google Scholar
  83. Thornley, J. H. M. (1981) Organogenesis. InMathematics and Plant Physiology. (D. A. Rose and D. A. Charles-Edwards, eds) pp. 49–65. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  84. Vincent, T. L. and Pulliam, H. R. (1980) Evolution of life history strategies for an asexual annual plant model.Theor. Pop. Biol. 17, 215–31.Google Scholar
  85. Watkinson, A. R. (1988) On the growth and reproductive schedules of plants: a modular viewpoint.Acta Oecol./Oecol. Plant. 9, 67–81.Google Scholar
  86. Watkinson, A. R. and White, J. (1986) Some life-history consequences of modular construction in plants.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 313, 31–51.Google Scholar
  87. Watson, M. A. (1984) Developmental constraints: effect on population growth and patterns of resource allocation in a clonal plant.Am. Nat. 123, 411–26.Google Scholar
  88. Watson, M. A. and Casper, B. B. (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 233–58.Google Scholar
  89. Werner, E. E. (1986) Amphibian metamorphosis: growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation.Am. Nat. 128, 319–41.Google Scholar
  90. White, J. (1984) Plant metamerism. InPerspectives on Plant Population Ecology. (R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan, eds) pp. 15–47. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA., USA.Google Scholar
  91. Williams, G. C. (1966)Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univerity Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  92. Williams, R. B. and Bell, K. L. (1981) Nitrogen allocation in Mojave Desert winter annuals.Oecol. (Berlin)48, 145–50.Google Scholar
  93. Willson, M. F. (1983)Plant Reproductive Ecology. Wiley, N. Y., USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon A. Fox
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Environmental Studies and Center for Population BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations