The structure and biological activity of immunoglobulins and their subunits

  • H. Isliker
  • H. Jacot-Guillarmod
  • J. C. Jaton
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, B. R., andW. E. Vannier: The sedimentation properties of the skin-sensitizing antibodies of ragweed-sensitive patients. J. Exp. Med.120, 31 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Askonas, B. A., andJ. L. Fahey: An investigation of closely related γ-myeloma proteins and normal mouse γ-globulin by partial enzymatic degradation and starch-gel electrophoresis. Nature (Lond.)190, 980 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barandun, S., u.H. Isliker: Properdinbestimmungen im Serum von Patienten mit einem Antikörpermangelsyndrom (Hypo- und Agammaglobulinämie). In: 4th Colloquium, edit.H. Peeters, p. 205. Bruges: St. Jans Hospital 1956.Google Scholar
  4. —,P. Kistler, F. Jeunet, andH. Isliker: Intravenous administration of γ-globulin. Vox Sang. (Basel)7, 157 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benacerraf, B., Z. Ovary, K. J. Bloch, andE. C. Franklin: Properties of guinea pig 7S antibodies. I. Electrophoretic separation of two types of guinea pig 7S antibodies. J. Exp. Med.117, 937 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binaghi, R. A., andB. Benacerraf: Properties of rat anaphylactic antibody. J. Immunol. (in press) (1964).Google Scholar
  7. ——,K. J. Bloch, andF. M. Kourilsky: Properties of rat anaphylactic antibody. J. Immunol.92, 927 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. —,P. Liacopoulos, B. N. Halpern, andM. Liacopoulos-Briot: Interference of nonspecific γ-globulins with passive in vitro anaphylactic sensitization of isolated guineapig intestine. Immunology5, 204 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanc, B.: Les protéines du lactosérum. Leurs relations avec l'immunité et le métabolisme du fer. Thèse, Université de Lausanne 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Bloch, K. J., F. M. Kourilsky, Z. Ovary, andB. Benacerraf: Properties of guinea pig 7 S antibodies. III. Identification of antibodies involved in complement fixation and hemolysis. J. Exp. Med.117, 965 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyden, S. V.: Cytophilic antibody in guinea-pigs with delayed-type hypersensitivity. Immunology7, 474 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. —, andE. Sorkin: The absorption of antibody and antigen by spleen cells in vitro. Some further experiments. Immunology4, 244 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. Brambell, F. W. R., W. A. Hemmings, C. L. Oakley, andR. R. Porter: The relative transmission of the fractions of papain-hydrolyzed homologous γ-globulin from the uterine cavity to the foetal circulation in the rabbit. Proc. roy. Soc.151, 478 (1959).Google Scholar
  14. Cann, J. R.: The separation and purification of antibodies. In: Immunity and virus infection, edit.F. Najjar, p. 100. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1959.Google Scholar
  15. Cebra, J. J., D. Givol, H. I. Silman, andE. Katchalski: A two-stage cleavage of rabbit γ-globulin by a water-insoluble papain preparation followed by cysteine. J. Biol. Chem.236, 1720 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cerottini, J., J. C. Jaton, T. Froidevaux, etH. Isliker: Immunofluorescence à l'aide de fragments d'anticorps. Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta22, C9 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, S.: Properties of the separated chains of human γ-globulin. Nature (Lond.)197, 253 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. —, andT. Freeman: Metabolic heterogeneity of human gamma-globulins. Biochem. J.76, 475 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. — andR. R. Porter: Heterogeneity of the peptide chains of γ-globulin. Biochem. J.90, 278 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Crumpton, H. J., andJ. M. Wilkinson: Amino acid compositions of human and rabbit γ-globulins and the fragments produced by reduction. Biochem. J.88, 228 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Deutsch, H. F., andJ. I. Morton: Dissociation of human serum macroglobulins. Science125, 600 (1957).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ——: Human serum macroglobulins and dissociation units. J. Biol. Chem.231, 1107 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. —,E. R. Stiehm, andJ. I. Morton: Action of papain on human serum globulins. J. Biol. Chem.236, 2216 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dixon, F.: The lack of absorption of ingested bovine antibody in humans. J. Immunol.83, 437 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Edelman, G. M.: Formation of active 7 S antibody molecules by reassociation of L and H polypeptide chains. Internat. Symposium on the cellular and molecular basis of antibody formation, Prague 1964.Google Scholar
  26. —, andB. Benacerraf: On structural and functional relations between antibodies and gamma-globulins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)48, 1035 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. —, andJ. A. Gally: The nature of Bence-Jones proteins. Chemical similarities to polypeptide chains of myeloma globulins and normal γ-globulins. J. Exp. Med.116, 207 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ——: A model for the 7S antibody molecule. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 846 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. —,J. F. Heremans, M. Th. Heremans, andH. G. Kunkel: Immunological studies of human gamma-globulin. Relation of the precipitates of whole gamma-globulin to those of the fragments produced by papain. J. Exp. Med.112, 203 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. —,D. E. Olins, J. A. Gally, andN. D. Zinder: Reconstitution of immunologic activity by interaction of polypeptide chains of antibodies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)50, 753 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —, andM. D. Poulik: Studies on structural units of the γ-globulins. J. Exp. Med.113, 861 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fahey, J. L.: The heterogeneity of γ-globulins. In: Advances in Immunology, edit.W. H. Taliaferro andJ. H. Humphrey, vol. 2, p. 42. New York and London: Academic Press (1962).Google Scholar
  33. —, andB. A. Askonas: Enzymatically produced subunits of proteins formed by plasma cells in mice. I. Gammaglobulin and gamma myeloma proteins. J. Exp. Med.115, 623 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. —,W. S. Barth, R. D. Wochner, andT. A. Waldmann: Metabolism of human gamma-macroglobulins. J. clin. Invest.43, 1036 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. —, andA. G. Robinson: Factors controlling the serum γ-globulin concentration. J. Exp. Med.118, 845 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Filitti-Wurmser, S., etL. Hartmann: Études physicochimiques des macroglobulines purifiées et des sérums humains normaux et pathologiques. Bull. Soc. Chim. biol. (Paris)54, 919 (1962).Google Scholar
  37. Fireman, P., W. E. Vannier, andH. C. Goodman: The association of skin-sensitizing antibody with the β2A-globulins in sera from ragweed-sensitive patients. J. Exp. Med.117, 603 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fleischman, J. B., R. H. Pain, andR. R. Porter: Reduction of γ-globulins. Arch. Biochem., Suppl.1, 174 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. —,R. R. Porter, andE. M. Press: The arrangement of the peptide chains in γ-globulin. Biochem. J.88, 220 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Franek, F.: Dissociation of animal 7 S γ-globulins by cleavage of disulfide bonds. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.4, 28 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franek, F., O. Kotinek, L. Simek, andJ. Zikan: S-sulphonated anti-dinitrophenyl antibodies. Some specific features of the interaction between isolated H and L subunits. Internat. Symposium on the cellular and molecular basis of antibody formation, Prague 1964.Google Scholar
  42. —, andR. S. Nezlin: Recovery of antibody combining activity by interaction of different peptide chains isolated from purified horse antitoxins. Folia microbiol. (Praha)8, 128 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Franklin, E. C.: Physicochemical and immunologic studies of low molecular γ-globulins of normal urine. J. clin. Invest.38, 2159 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. —: Some properties of the breakdown products of human 7 S gamma-globulin and antibodies. J. clin. Invest.39, 986 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. —: The immune globulins. — Their structure and function and some techniques for their isolation. Progr. Allergy8, 58 (1964).Google Scholar
  46. Franklin, E. C., H. Fudenberg, M. Meltzer, andD. R. Stanworth: The structural basis for genetic variations of normal human γ-globulins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)48, 914 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. —,M. Meltzer, F. Guggenheim, andJ. Lowenstein: An unusual micro γ-globulin in the serum and urine of a patient. Fed. Proc.22, 264 (1963).Google Scholar
  48. —, andD. R. Stanworth: Antigenic relationships between immune globulins and certain related paraproteins in man. J. Exp. Med.114, 521 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fudenberg, H.: The hereditary human gamma-globulin (Gm) groups: Interpretations. Progr. Allergy7, 1 (1963).Google Scholar
  50. Fudenberg, H. H., G. Drews andA. Nisonoff: Serologic demonstration of dual specificity of rabbit bivalent hybrid antibody. J. Exp. Med.119, 151 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. —, andA. Nisonoff: Properties of univalent 3.5 S fragments of 7 S agglutinating antibodies. J. clin. Invest.41, 1360 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gitlin, D., P. A. M. Gross, andC. A. Janeway: The gamma-globulins and their clinical significance. I. Chemistry, immunology and metabolism. New Engl. J. Med.260, 21 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. —, andE. Merler: A comparison of the peptides released from rabbit antibodies by enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Exp. Med.114, 217 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Givol, D., andM. Sela: A comparison of fragments of rabbit antibodies and normal γ-globulin by the peptide-map technique. Biochemistry3, 451 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Grey, H. M.: Phylogeny of the immune response. J. Immunol.91, 819 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Grossberg, A. L., O. A. Roholt, andD. Pressman: Different distribution of antibodies of two specificities among γ-globulins of an individual rabbit. Biochemistry2, 989 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Grubb, R., andB. Swahn: Destruction of some agglutinins but not of others by two sulfhydryl compounds. Acta path. microbiol. scand.43, 305 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gyenes, L., A. H. Sehon, S. O. Freedman, andZ. Ovary: The properties of fragments of skin-sensitizing and blocking antibodies as revealed by the Prausnitz-Kuestner, passive cutaneous anaphylaxis and hemagglutination reactions. Int. Arch. Allergy24, 106 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Habich, H., etA. Hässig: Essai d'analyse antigènique des paraprotéines dans la macroglobulinémie de Waldenstrøm. Vox Sang. (Basel)3, 99 (1953).Google Scholar
  60. Halpern, B. N., andO. L. Frick: Protection against foetal anaphylactic shock with γ-globulins in guinea pigs and mice. J. Immunol.88, 683 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hanson, L. A.: Comparative immunological studies of the immune globulins of human milk and of blood serum. Int. Arch. Allergy18, 241 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Harboe, M., C. K. Osterland, andH. G. Kunkel: Localization of two genetic factors (Gm and Inv) to different areas of 7 S γ-globulin molecules. Science136, 979 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ——,K. M. Mannik, andH. G. Kunkel: Genetic characters of human γ-globulins and myeloma proteins. J. Exp. Med.116, 719 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Heremans, J. F., A. O. Carbonara, G. Mancini, andR. Lontie: Studies on normal and patholgoical γ1A-globulins and their subunits. In: Protides of the biological fluids, edit.H. Peeters. Amsterdam 1964.Google Scholar
  65. —, andJ. P. Vaerman: β2A-globulins as a possible carrier of allergic reaginic activity. Nature (Lond.)193, 1091 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hill, W. C.: Properties of purified horse macroglobulin antibodies. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville 1964.Google Scholar
  67. Hinz, C.: Personal communications 1958.Google Scholar
  68. Hitzig, W. H., andH. Isliker: Protides of the biological fluids. In: Proc. 7th Colloquium, edit.H. Peeters, p. 372,Bruges 1959.Google Scholar
  69. Hsiao S. H., andF. W. Putnam: The cleavage of human γ-globulin by papain. J. Biol. Chem.236, 122 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Iscaki, S., etM. Raynaud: Propriétés de fragments de molécules d'anticorps antitoxiques (antidiphtériques) obtenus par digestion pepsique du précipité spécifique et réduction. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris)253, 2286 (1961).Google Scholar
  71. Ishizaka, K.: Gamma-globulin and molecular mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions. Progr. Allergy7, 32 (1963).Google Scholar
  72. —, andT. Ishizaka: Molecular basis of passive sensitization. II. The role of fragment III of γ-globulin and its disulfide bonds in passive sensitization and complement fixation. J. Immunol.93, 59 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Ishizaka, K., andT. Ishizaka, andM. Hathorn: Blocking of Prausnitz-Kuestner sensitization with reagin by “A chain” of human γA-globulin. Immunochem. 1964 (in press).Google Scholar
  74. Isliker, H. C.: The chemical nature of antibodies. Advanc. Protein Chem.12, 387 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Isliker, H. C.: The properdin system and its significance in immunopathology. Immunopath. Ist. Internat. Symposium, p. 28, Basel 1958.Google Scholar
  76. —: Réactions non spécifiques de défense. Helv. med. Acta26, 634 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. —: Les macroglobulines du plasma humain. Bull. Acad. suisse Sci. med.17, 139 (1961).Google Scholar
  78. Isliker, H. C., J. C. Cerottini, J. C. Jaton, andG. Magnenat: Fixation of specific and nonspecific plasma proteins in tumors. Internat. symposium on tumor chemotherapy, Lugano 1964.Google Scholar
  79. Isliker, H. C., H. Jacot-Guillarmod, andM. Thoeni: Reversible inactivation of γ1M-globulins. Anticomplementary activity and tissue affinity of human γ-globulin. NAS/NRC Symposium on gamma-globulin, Washington 1962.Google Scholar
  80. —,B. le Maire, andC. Morgan: The use of ferritin conjugated antibody-fragments in electron-microscopic studies of viruses. Path. et Microbiol. (Basel)27, 521 (1964).Google Scholar
  81. —, andE. Linder: Methods for the assay of properdin. Vox Sang. (Basel)3, 23 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Isliker, H. C., andM. Thoeni: Unpublished data 1962.Google Scholar
  83. Jacot-Guillarmod, H.: Les macroglobulines sériques et leurs subunités; scission réversible et activité biologique. Thèse, Université de Lausanne 1964.Google Scholar
  84. —, etH. C. Isliker: Scission et réassociation des isoagglutinines traitées par des agents réducteurs des ponts disulfures. Préparation d'anticorps mixtes. Vox Sang. (Basel)7, 675 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. ——: Scission réversible des isoagglutinines 19 S. Étude de fixation des subunités. Vox Sang. (Basel)9, 31 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Jaquet, H., B. Bloom, andJ. J. Cebra: The reductive dissociation of rabbit immune globulin in sodium dodecylsulfate. J. Immunol.92, 991 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Jaton, J. C., etH. C. Isliker: Étude de la fixation de fragments d'anticorps sur différents tissus. Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta20, C 62 (1962).Google Scholar
  88. Jaton, J. C., Scholer andIsliker: Unpublished data (1964).Google Scholar
  89. Kabat, E. A.: Heterogeneity in extent of the combining regions of human antidextran. J. Immunol.77, 377 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. —: The upper limit of the size of the human antidextran combining site. J. Immunol.84, 82 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. —, andM. M. Mayer: Purification of antibodies. In: Experimental Immunochemistry II. ed. Springfield: C. C. Thomas 1962.Google Scholar
  92. Kappeler, R., andH. C. Isliker: Unpublished data 1959.Google Scholar
  93. Karush, F.: Immunologic specificity and molecular structure. In: Advances in Immunology, vol. 2, p. 1. New York and London: Academic Press 1962.Google Scholar
  94. Karush, F.: Personal communication 1964.Google Scholar
  95. Keller, H., H. C. Isliker u.H. Aebi: Turnover des Properdins beim Kaninchen. Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta15, C 21 (1957).Google Scholar
  96. Killander, J., andP. Flodin: The fractionation of serum proteins by gel filtration. Vox Sang. (Basel)7, 113 (1962).Google Scholar
  97. Kjellén, L.: Reactions between adenovirus antigens and papain digested rabbit immune globulin. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.14, 189 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kovacs, A. M., etM. Daune: Masse et dimensions d'une molécule de macroglobuline. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Amst.)50, 249 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Kunkel, H. C.: Macroglobulins and high molecular weight antibodies. In: The Plasma Proteins, vol. 1, p. 294, edit.F. W. Putnam. New York and London: Academic Press 1960.Google Scholar
  100. Landy, M., andL. Pillemer: Increased resistance to infection accompanying properdin alterations and following administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. J. Exp. Med.104, 383 (1956).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Leddy, J. P., G. L. Freeman, A. Luz, andR. H. Todd: Inactivation of the skin-sensitizing antibodies of human allergy by thiols. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)111, 7 (1962).Google Scholar
  102. Lepow, T.: Personal communication 1964.Google Scholar
  103. Mandy, W. J., M. M. Rivers, andA. Nisonoff: Recombination of univalent subunits derived from rabbit antibody. J. Biol. Chem.236, 3221 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Marler, E., C. A. Nelson, andC. Tanford: The polypeptide chains of rabbit γ-globulin and its papain-cleaved fragments. Biochemistry3, 279 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. McDougall, E. I., andH. F. Deutsch: A comparison of the native and monomer forms of macroglobulin from pathological human serum with particular reference to electrophoretic mobility differences. Biochem. J.90, 163 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. ——: Disulfide bonds in macroglobulin: A correction of interpretations of results. Biochem. J.92, 1c (1964).Google Scholar
  107. McFadden, M. L., andE. L. Smith: Free amino groups and N-terminal sequence of rabbit antibodies. J. Biol. Chem.214, 185 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Metzger, H., L. Wofsy, andS. J. Singer: A specific antibody-hapten reaction with novel spectral properties. Arch. Biochem.103, 206 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. ———: Affinity labelling of the active sites of antibodies to the 2,4-dinitrophenyl hapten. Biochemistry2, 979 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. ———: The participation of A and B polypeptide chains in the active sites of antibody molecules. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 612 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Micheli, A., H. Jacot-Guillarmod etH. C.Isliker: Essai de scission des liaisons disulfures protéiques à l'aide d'un système enzymatique. Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta21, 38 (1963).Google Scholar
  112. Miescher, P. A., H. L. Spiegelberg, andB. Benacerraf: Mechanism of elimination of sensitized rat erythrocytes and E. Coli from the circulation of mice. In: Immunopathology, IIIrd Internat. Symposium, La Jolla, Calif. USA; edit.P. Grabar, andP. A. Miescher. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1963.Google Scholar
  113. Molinaro, G., J. C. Jaton, H. J. Scholer, andH. C. Isliker: Int. Arch. Allergy (in press).Google Scholar
  114. Nelson, R. A.: An alternative mechanism for the properdin system. J. Exp. Med.108, 515 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Nisonoff, A., G. Markus, andF. C. Wissler: Separation of univalent fragments of rabbit antibody by reduction of a single labile disulfide bond. Nature (Lond.)189, 293 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. —, andJ. L. Palmer: Hybridization of half molecules of rabbit γ-globulin. Science143, 222 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. —, andM. M. Rivers: Recombination of a mixture of univalent antibody fragments of different specificity. Arch. Biochem.93, 460 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. F. C. Wissler, L. N. Lipman, andD. L. Woernley: Separation of univalent fragments from the bivalent rabbit antibody molecule by reduction of disulfide bond. Arch. Biochem.89, 230 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. ——, andD. L. Woernley: Mechanism of formation of univalent fragments of rabbit antibody. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.1, 318 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Nolan, C., andE. L. Smith: Glycopeptides. II. Isolation and properties of glycopeptides from rabbit γ-globulin. J. Biol. Chem.237, 446 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Nussenzweig, R. S., C. Merryman, andB. Benacerraf: Electrophoretic separation and properties of mouse antihapten antibodies involved in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis and passive hemolysis. J. Exp. Med.120, 315 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Olesen, H.: Turnover studies with iodine labeled gamma-macroglobulin and albumin. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.15, 497 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Oncley, J. L., M. Melin, D. A. Richert, J. W. Cameron, andP. M. Gross: The separation of the antibodies, isoagglutinins, prothrombin, plasminogen, and β1-lipoprotein into subfractions of human plasma. J. Amer. Chem. Soc.71, 541 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Ovary, Z., B. Benacerraf, andK. J. Bloch: Properties of guinea pig 7 S antibodies. II. Identification of antibodies involved in passive cutaneous and systemic anaphylaxis. J. Exp. Med.117, 951 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Ovary, Z., K. J. Bloch, andB. Benacerraf: Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  126. —, andF. Karush: Studies on the immunologic mechanism of anaphylaxis. II. Sensitizing and combining capacityin vivo of fractions separated from papain digests of antihapten antibody. J. Immunol.86, 146 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. —, andA. Taranta: Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis with antibody fragments. Science140, 193 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Pain, R. H.: The molecular weights of the peptide chains of γ-globulins. Biochem. J.88, 234 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Palmer, J. L., W. J. Mandy, andA. Nisonoff: Heterogeneity of rabbit antibody and its subunits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)48, 49 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. —, andA. Nisonoff: Dissociation of rabbit γ-globulin into half-molecules after reduction of one labile disulfide bond. Biochemistry3, 863 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Parke, J. A. C., andP. J. Avis: The effect of digestion with papain and pepsin upon the antitoxin activity of rabbit antibody. Immunology7, 248 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Petermann, M. L.: The splitting of human γ-globulin antibodies by papain and bromelin. J. Amer. Chem. Soc.68, 106 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Pillemer, L., L. Blum, I. H. Lepow, O. A. Ross, E. W. Todd, andA. C. Wardlaw: The properdin system and immunity: I. Demonstration and isolation of a new serum protein, properdin, and its role in immune phenomena. Science120, 279 (1954).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Porter, R. R.: A chemical study of rabbit antiovalbumin. Biochem. J.46, 473 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. —: The hydrolysis of rabbit gamma-globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain. Biochem. J.73, 119 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. —: Chemical structure of γ-globulin and antibodies. Brit. med. Bull.19, 197 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Putnam, F. W., M. Tan, L. T. Lynn, C. W. Easley, andS. Migita: The cleavage of rabbit γ-globulin by papain. J. Biol. Chem.237, 717 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Raynaud, M., andS. Iscaki: Co-precipitating properties of 3S fragments derived from horse antitoxins. Nature (Lond.)203, 758 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Reisner, C. A., andE. C. Franklin: Studies of mercaptoethanol-dissociated normal human 19S γ-globulin and pathologic macroglobulins from patients with macroglobulinemia. J. Immunol.87, 654 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Reiss, A. M., andO. J. Plescia: Fixation of complement to fragments of antibody. Science141, 812 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Ritzmann, S. E., S. N. Coleman, andW. C. Lewin: The effect of some mercaptans upon macrocryoglobulin; modifications induced by cysteamine, penicillamine and penicillin. J. clin. Invest.39, 1320 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Rockey, J. H., andH. G. Kunkel: Unusual sedimentation and sulfhydryl sensitivity of certain isohemagglutinins and skin-sensitizing antibody. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)110, 101 (1962).Google Scholar
  143. Roholt, O., K. Onoue, andD. Pressman: Specific combination of H and L chains of rabbit γ-globulins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 173 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. —,G. Radzimski, andD. Pressman: Antibody-combining site: the B polypeptide chain. Science141, 726 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Rosevear, J. W., andE. L. Smith: Glycopeptides. I. Isolation and properties of glycopeptides from a fraction of human γ-globulin. J. Biol. Chem.236, 425 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Rothstein, F.: Thesis, Harvard University, Boston 1962.Google Scholar
  147. Rowley, D.: Le système properdine et son rôle dans l'immunité. Triangle (Sandoz, Basel)3, 17 (1957).Google Scholar
  148. Rowley, D., H. Isliker, andM. Thoeni: Nature (in press).Google Scholar
  149. —, andK. J. Turner: Increase in macroglobulin antibodies of mouse and pig following injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Immunology7, 394 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Rytel, M. W.: Properdin. Science130, 826 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Schultze, H. E., H. Haupt, K. Heide, N. Heimburger, andG. Schwick: Comparative investigations on purified diphtheria and tetanus T-components and their fragments. Personal communication 1964.Google Scholar
  152. ———,G. Möschlin, R. Schmidtberger u.G. Schwick: Untersuchungen über Gamma-Makroglobuline des menschlichen Serums. Z. Naturforsch.17B, 313 (1962).Google Scholar
  153. —, u.G. Schwick: Neue Möglichkeiten intravenöser Gamma-globulin Applikationen. Dtsch. med. Wschr.87, 1643 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Schur, P. H., andE. L. Becker: Pepsin digestion of rabbit and sheep antibodies. The effect on complement fixation. J. Exp. Med.118, 891 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Sehon, A. H.: The nature of antibodies in conditions of hypersensitivity in man. In: Protides of the biological fluids, p. 67, edit.H. Peeters. Amsterdam 1964.Google Scholar
  156. Silman, H. I., J. J. Cebra, andD. Givol: The carboxyl terminal amino acids of rabbit γ-globulin. J. Biol. Chem.237, 2196 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Singer, S. J., andA. F. Schick: The properties of specific stains for electron microscopy. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.9, 519 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Singer, S. J., L. Wofsy, andA. H. Good: Studies of antibody combining sites by affinity labelling. Internat. Symposium on the cellular and molecular basis of antibody formation, Prague 1964.Google Scholar
  159. Sober, H. A., F. J. Gutter, M. M. Wycoff, andE. A. Peterson: Chromatography of proteins. II. Fractionation of serum proteins on anion exchanger cellulose. J. Amer. Chem. Soc.78, 756 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Sorkin, E.: “Cytophilic antibody”. The immunologically competent cell: A Ciba Foundation Symposium. Ed. byG. E. W. Wolstenholme andM. P. Cameren, p. 53. London: Churchill 1963.Google Scholar
  161. Spiegelberg, H. L., andW. O. Weigle: The catabolism of homologous and heterologous 7S γ-globulin fragments. In press, 1965.Google Scholar
  162. Stelos, P., O. Roholt, andD. Pressman: Heterogeneity of the major fractions of papain digests of rabbit antibody. J. Immunol.89, 113 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Strauss, A. J. L., P. G. Kemp, W. E. Vannier, andH. C. Goodman: Purification of human serum γ-globulin for immunologic studies: γ-globulin fragmentation after sulfate precipitation and prolonged dialysis. J. Immunol.93, 24 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Svehag, S. E. andB. Mandel: The formation and properties of poliovirus-neutralizing antibody. J. Exp. Med.119, 1 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Terr, A. I., andJ. D. Bentz: Density-gradient sedimentation of skin-sensitizing antibody and γ2A-globulin in serum of allergic individuals. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)115, 721 (1964).Google Scholar
  166. Thorbecke, G. J., B. Benacerraf, andZ. Ovary: Antigenic relationship between two types of 7S guinea pig γ-globulins. J. Immunol.91, 670 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Uhr, J. W., andM. S. Finkelstein: Antibody formation. IV. Formation of rapidly and slowly sedimenting antibodies and immunological memory to bacteriophage. J. Exp. Med.117, 457 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Weil, A. J., J. A. Parfentiev, andK. L. Bowmann: Antigenic qualities of antitoxins. J. Immunol.35, 399 (1938).Google Scholar
  169. Wiedermann, G., P. A. Miescher, andE. C. Franklin: Effect of mercaptoethanol on complement binding ability of human 7S gammaglobulin. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)113, 609 (1963).Google Scholar
  170. Wilbrandt, R.: Beitrag zum Mechanismus der reduktiven Spaltung von Makroglobulinen. Thesis, University of Berne 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Isliker
  • H. Jacot-Guillarmod
  • J. C. Jaton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations