Skip to main content
Log in

Calculation of programmed temperature retention indices: Part 2: Optimization of temperature dependence calculation

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Programmed Temperature Retention Indices (PTRI) of several solutes on four packed columns coated with stationary phases covering a range of polarities have been estimated for sixteen temperature programs by exploiting isothermal retention data obtained at 70–180°C. PTRI calculations have been carried out by interpolating the retention temperatures calculated according to Curvers et al. from the graphs of retention index against column temperature, matched according to polynomials of grade 1 to 3 and by hyperbolic fitting. PTRIs by the van den Doole & Kratz equation and by cubic splines have also been computed. Comparison is made of these PTRIs with those calculated from cubic splines of the measured retention temperatures throughout the various temperature programs and the retention index deviations in terms of variance and relative error are explored. The smallest variance are found for the less polar stationary phases, PS-255 and OV-105; the biggest variance values are found for OV-275. Data are given showing that about 95% of the determinations of PTRIs on the low polarity stationary phases show deviations of not greater than 2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Curvers, J. Rijks, C. Cramers, K. Knauss, P. Larson, JHRC & CC8, 607 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. E. Akporhonor, S. Le Vent, D. R. Taylor, J. Chromatogr.463, 271 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Said, JHRC & CC11, 678 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Krupcik, P. Cellar, D. Repka, J. Garaj, G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr.351, 111 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. van den Doole, P. D. Kratz, J. Chromatogr.11, 463 (1963).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J. C. Giddings, in:N. Brenner, J. E. Callen, M. D. Weiss (eds.), Gas Chromatography, Academic Press, New York, p. 57 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Guiochon, Anal. Chem.36, 661 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Lee, D. R. Taylor, Chromatographia16, 286 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. V. Golovnya, V. P. Uraletz, J. Chromatogr.36, 276 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Erdey, J. Takács, E. Szalancy, J. Chromatogr.46, 29 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. G. Zenkevich, Zh. Anal. Khim.39, 1297 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Wang, Y. Sun, J. Chromatogr.390, 261 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Chen, X. Guo, S. Pency, Chromatographia23, 888 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Podmaniczki, L. Szepesy, K. Lakszner, G. Schomburg, Chromatographia21, 387 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Kusz, W. Czelakowski, Int. Lab. 92 (1987).

  16. E. Fernández Sánchez, J. A. García Domínguez, V. Menéndez, J. M. Santiuste, J. Chromatogr.498, 1 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. A. García Domínguez, J. M. Santiuste, Chromatographia32, 115 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. A. Halang, R. Langlaus, E. Kugler, Anal. Chem.,50, 1829 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Tarján, Sz. Nyiredy, M. Györ, E. R. Lombosi, T. S. Lombosi, M. V. Budahegyi, S. Y. Mészáros, J. M. Takács, J. Chromatogr.472, 1 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. B. Evans, J. K. Haken, J. Chromatogr.472, 93 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Kováts, Helv. Chim. Acta41, 1915 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Guan, J. Kiraly, J. Rijks, J. Chromatogr.472, 129 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santiuste, J.M. Calculation of programmed temperature retention indices: Part 2: Optimization of temperature dependence calculation. Chromatographia 34, 636–642 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269876

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269876

Key Words

Navigation