Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 30, Issue 11–12, pp 713–718 | Cite as

Capillary zone electrophoresis and isotachophoresis: A comparison by information theory

  • E. Kenndler
Würzburg Chromatography Colloquium

Summary

A comparison of the potentialities of free capillary zone electrophoresis and isotachophoresis with respect to qualitative analysis i.e. as a means of identification, is given based on information theory for the one dimensional case, i.e. single electrolyte systems. The maximum number of peaks which can be differentiated in a zone electropherogram, in the absence of electroosmosis, is derivied. This number depends on the ratio of the migration timer, or the mobilty range, of the fastet and the slowest migrating separands, on the disired resolution and on the number of theoretical plates. Based on this peak capacity, the maximum information content Imax (decision content) is calculated and both electrophpretic techniques are compared by means of this rational parmameter. Within certain limitations it is found that the decision content of free capillary zone electrophoresis is about 7.7 bit, which is about 1 bit greater than the corresponding value for isotachophoresis (6.7 bit).

Key Words

Capillary zone electrophoresis Isotachophoresis Information theory Displacement electrophoresis Qualitative analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. L. Massart, A. Dijkstra, L. Kaufman, “Evaluation and Optimization of Laboratory Methods and Analytical Procedures”, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Eckschlager, V. Stepanek, “Information Theory as Applied to Chemical Analysis”, Wiley, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. L. Massart, B. G. M. Vandeginste, S. N. Deming, Y. Michotte, L. Kaufman, “Chemometrics; a textbook”, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Cleij, A. Dijkstra Z. Anal. Chem.,298, 97 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Liteanu, I. Rica, Anal. Chem.,51, 1986 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. Eckschlager, V. Stepanek, Anal. Chem.,54, 1116A (1982).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. L. Grotch, Anal. Chem.,42, 1214 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. E. Wangen, W. S. Woodward, T. L. Isenhour, Anal. Chem.,43, 1605 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. van Marlen, A. Dijstra, Anal. Chem.,48, 595 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. F. K. Huber, E. Kenndler, G. Reioch, J. Chromatogr.,172, 159 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. L. Ritter, S. R. Lowry, H. B. Woodruff, T. L. Isenhour, Anal. Chem.,48, 1027 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    P. F. Dupuis, A. Dijkstra, J. H. van der Maas, Z. Anal. Chem.,291, 27 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. F. Dupuis, A. Dijkstra, Z. Anal. Chem.,290, 357, (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. H. Heite, P. F. Dupuis, H. A. van't Klooster, A. Dijkstra, Anal. Chim. Acta.,103, 313 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Suoto, A. Gonzales de Valesi, J. Chromatogr.,46, 274 (1970).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. L. Massart, J. Chromatogr.,79, 157 (1973).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. L. Massart, H. De Clercq, Anal. Chem.,46, 1988 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    H. De Clercq, D. L. Massart, J. Chromatogr.,93, 243 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. De Clercq, D. L. Massart, J. Chromatogr.,115, 1 (1975).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    H. De Clercq, D. L. Massart, L. Dryon, J. Pharm. Sci.,66, 1269 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Cleij, A. Dijkstra, Z. Anal. Chem.,294, 361 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    D. L. Massart, H. De Clercq, in:J. C. Giddings andR. A. Keller (Eds.), “Advances in Chromatography”, Vol. 16, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978, p. 75 ff.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    J. F. K. Huber, H. C. Smit, Z. Anal. Chem.,245, 84 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    F. Dupuis, A. Dijkstra, Anal. Chem.,47, 379 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. Eskes, F. Dupuis, A. Dijkstra, H. De Clercq D. L. Massart, Anal. Chem.,47, 2168 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    E. Kenndler, Anal. Chim. Acta,173, 239 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. O'M. Bockris, A. K. N. Reddy, “Modern Electrochemistry”, Vol. 1, 3rd ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    R. A. Wallingford, A. G. Ewing, “Capillary Electrophoresis”, in:J. C. Giddings, E. Grushka, P. B. Brown, (eds.), “Advances in Chromatography”, Vol. 29, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989, p. 1 ff.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    J. F. K. Huber, Z. Anal. Chem.,277, 341 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    E. Kenndler, submitted for publication in J. Chromatogr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Kenndler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Analytical ChemistryUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations