Skip to main content
Log in

Ascomycete phylogenetics: Morphology and molecules

  • Review
  • Published:
Mycoscience

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature cited

  • Bruns, T. D., White, T. J. and Taylor, J. W. 1991. Fungal molecular systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.22: 525–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. R. and Taylor, J. W. 1993. “The fungal holomorph: Mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics,” CAB International, Wallingford 375p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, T. D., Vilgalys, R., Barns, S. M., Gonzalez, D., Hibbett, D. S., Lane, D. J., Simon, L., Stickel, S., Szaro, T. M., Weisburg, W. G. and Sogin, M. L. 1992. Evolutionary relationship within the fungi: analyses of nuclear small subunit rRNA sequences. Mol. Phylog. Evol.1: 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, H. and Sugiyama, J. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships amongTaphrina, Saitoella, and other higher fungi. Mol. Biol. Evol.10: 431–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berbee, M. L. and Taylor, J. W. 1992. Two Ascomycete classes based on fruiting-body characters and ribosomal DNA sequence. Mol. Biol. Evol.9: 278–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spatafora, J. W. and Blackwell, M. 1993. Molecular systematics of unitunicate perithecial Ascomycetes. I. The Clavicipitales-Hypocreales connection. Mycologia,85: 912–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. W., Swann, E. and Berbee, M. L. 1993. Molecular evolution of ascomycete fungi: Phylogeny and conflict. In: “First international workshop on ascomycete systematics,” (ed. by Hawksworth, D. L.), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, Plenum Press, New York. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool.38: 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, J. J., Huelsenbeck, J. P., Cunningham, C. W., Swofford, D. L. and Waddell, P. J. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol.42: 384–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berbee, M. L. and Taylor, J. W. 1992. Convergence in ascospore discharge mechanism among pyrenomycete fungi based on 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence. Mol. Phylog. Evol.1: 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoBuglio, K. F., Pitt, J. I. and Taylor,J. W. 1993. Independent origins of the synnematousPenicillium species,P. duclauxii, P. clavigerum, andP. vulpinum, as assessed by two ribosomal DNA regions. Mycol. Res. (in press).

  • Raper, K. B., Thom, C. and Fennel, D. I. 1949. “A manual of the Penicillia,” Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J. I. 1979. “The genusPenicillium and its teleomorphic statesEupenicillium andTalaromyces,” Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, R. A., Stolk, A. C. and Hadlock, R. 1976. Revision of the subsection fasciculata ofPenicillium and some allied species. Stud. Mycol.11: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolk, A. C., Samson, R. A., Frisvad, J. C. and Filtenborg, O. 1990. The systematics of the terverticillate Penicillia. In: “Modern concepts inPenicillium andAspergillus classification,” (ed. by Samson R. A. and Pitt, J. I.), pp. 121–137. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, S. W. 1993. Molecular genetic assessment of relatedness ofPenicillium subgenusPenicillium. In: “The fungal holomorph: Mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics,” (ed. by Reynolds, D. R. and Taylor, J. W.), pp. 121–128. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuraishi, H., Aoki, M, Itoh, M., Katayama, Y., Sugiyama, J. and Pitt, J. I. 1991. Distribution of ubiquinones inPenicillium and related genera. Mycol. Res.95: 705–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisvad, J. C. and Samson, R. A. 1991. Filamentous fungi in foods and feeds: ecology, spoilage, and mycotoxin production. In: “Handbook of applied mycology, vol. 3, Foods and Feeds,” (ed. by Arora, D. K., Mukerji, K. G. and Marth, E. H., pp. 31–68. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, R. A., Stolk, A. C. and Frisvad, J. C. 1989. Two new synnematous species ofPenicillium. Stud. Mycol.31: 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J. I. and Leistner, L. 1991. ToxigenicPenicillium species. In: “Mycotoxins and Animal Foods,” (ed. by Smith, J. E. and Henderson, R. S.), pp. 81–99. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1991. PHYLIP 3.4. Dept. of Genetics, SK-50, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P. and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L. 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.1.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, J.W., LoBuglio, K.F. Ascomycete phylogenetics: Morphology and molecules. Mycoscience 35, 109–112 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02268538

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02268538

Navigation