Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the terrain of pastoral psychology

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pastoral psychology has, over the course of the past century, undergone substantial transformation. Changes in the territory warrant, if not require, a thoroughly revised map. This essay approaches pastoral psychology as an interdisciplinary enterprise, a bridge discipline unifying three diverse, integrally related angles of vision: as a specialized field of theology (or theological studies), a specialized field or kind of psychology (or psychological studies), and a practical-clinical enterprise. The need to systematize the field as well as demonstrate its complex relations with cognate areas recommends approaching pastoral psychology, ultimately, as theological: as a dimension of pastoral theology, a kind of practical theology, which integrates practice-theory (praxis) and research; involves religious-theological and psychological domains of experiences, patterns of behavior, and forms of reflection; and maintains a focus on the understanding and care of persons across intrapsychic, familial, community, and cultural levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein, R. (1992).The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernitylpos/moderntity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (1980).Pluralism and personality: William James and some contemporary cultures of personality. Lewisburg: Buckneil University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (Ed.) (1983).Practical theology. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (1987a). Mapping the terrain of pastoral theology: Toward a practical theology of care.Pastoral Psychology, 36(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (1987b).Religious thought and the modern psychologies. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, D. S. (191).A fundamental practical theology: Descriptive and strategic proposals. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

  • Burck, J. R., & Hunter, R. J. (1990). Protestant pastoral theology. In R. J. Hunter, H. N. Malony, L. O. Mills, & J. Patton (Eds.),Dictionary of pastoral care and counseling (pp. 867–872). Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. E. & Wawrytko, S. A. (1990).Rethinking the curriculum: Toward an integrated, interdisciplinary college education. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M. & Pahre, R. (1990).Creative marginality: Innovation at the intersections of social sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. & Schelling, C. S. (1991).Divided knowledge: Across disciplines, across cultures. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, E. (1983). Theology and practice outside the clerical paradigm. In D. S. Browning (Ed.),Practical theology (pp. 21–42). San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, E. (1987). Interpreting situations: An inquiry into the nature of practical theology. In L. Mudge & J. Poling (Eds.),Formation arid reflection: The promise of practical theology (pp. 1–26). Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, E. (1990). Protestant practical theology. In R. J. Hunter, H. N. Malony, L. O. Mills, & J. Patton (Eds.),Dictionary of pastoral care and counseling (pp. 934–936). Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerkin, C. V. (1986).Widening the horizons: Pastoral responses to a fragmented society. Philadelphia: Westminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerkin, C. V. (1991).Prophetic pastoral practice: A Christian vision of life together. Nashville: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaz, M. (1991). Gender issues in pastoral theology.Journal of Pastoral Theology, 1, 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulooze, W. (1954).Pastoral psychology: Applied psychology in pastoral theology in America. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. K. (1992).Care of persons, care of worlds: A psychosystems approach to pastoral care and counseling. Nashville: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearnshaw, L. S. (1987).The shaping of modem psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltner, S. (1952). The meaning of pastoral psychology. In S. Doniger (Ed.),The best of pastoral psychology (pp. 7–8). Great Neck: Pastoral Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltner, S. (1958).Preface to pastoral theology. New York: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E. A. (1990). Discipline of pastoral psychology. In R. J. Hunter, H. N. Malony, L. O. Mills, & J. Patton (Eds.),Dictionary of pastoral care and counseling (pp. 859–860). Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, J. C., Jr. (1991). The university and the common good. In D. R. Griffin & J. C. Hough, Jr. (Eds.),Theology and the university: Essays in honor of John B. Cobb, Jr. (pp. 97–124). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. D. (1973). Bases for a pastoral psychology. In O. Strunk, Jr. (Ed.),Dynamic interpersonalism for ministry: Essays in honor of Paul E. Johnson (pp. 85–107). Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, T. W. (1990). Pastoral theological methodology. In R. J. Hunter, H. N. Malony, L. O. Mills, & J. Patton (Eds.),Dictionary of pastoral care and counseling (pp. 862–864). Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. E. (1953).Psychology of pastoral care. New York: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1990).Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (1985). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua science. In S. Koch & D. E. Leary (Eds.),A century of psychology as science (pp. 75–97). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, J. N. (1991). On defining pastoral theology.Journal of Pastoral Theology, 1, 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobkowicz, N. (1967).Theory and practice: History of a concept from Aristotle to Marx. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1982).Knowledge: Its creation, distribution, and economic significance, Vol. 2. The branches of learning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, R. L. (1991). Practical theology: A discipline in search of a definition.Perspectives in Religious Studies, 18, 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P. T. (1987).A history and philosophy of the social sciences. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D. R., & Sylvan, D. J. (Eds.) (1993).Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, L. S. & Poling, J. N. (Eds.) (1987).Formation and reflection: The promise of practical theology. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, R. C. (1991).Behind the masks of God: An essay toward comparative theology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. (1993).Pastoral care in context: An introduction to pastoral care. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, F. (1993).Analysis analyzed: When the map becomes the territory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958).Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poling, J. N. (1991).The abuse of power: A theological problem. Nashville: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poling, J. N. & Miller, D. E. (1985).Foundations for a practical theology of ministry. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, P. (1966).The triumph of the therapeutic: Uses of faith after Freud. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, P. (1979).Freud: The mind of the moralist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, V. S. (1991). American psychology and philosophy, 1876–1976: Alienation and reconciliation. In H. N. Malony (Ed.),Psychology of religion: Personalities, problems, possibilities. (pp. 21–36). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1939). The conception of man in existential philosophy.Journal of Religion, 19, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1951).Systematic theology, Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972).Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1988). The recovery of practical philosophy.The American Scholar, 57, 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, D. (1975).Blessed rage for order. The new pluralism in theology. New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlauch, C.R. Mapping the terrain of pastoral psychology. Pastoral Psychol 44, 237–249 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266899

Keywords

Navigation