Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 3–4, pp 351–363 | Cite as

Effects of relative advantage on time use in farm families

  • Geraldine I. Olson
  • Jing J. Xiao
Household Time Allocation

Abstract

An assumption of comparative advantage (CA) is that all members in efficient households specialize in market or household work. The CA for Oregon farm households was measured by differences between husbands and wives in wages and schooling for nonfarm work, and in farm decision-making responsibility and years lived on a farm for farm work. The spouse with the advantage is assumed to spend more time in that work sector and less time in household work than his (her) spouse. The hypothesis is supported for market work. For farm decision making, results are consistent with the hypothesis but not significant. Years lived on a farm is consistent for husbands, but wives who have the CA do significantly less farm work than wives of men who hold the CA. Experience may not be a good measure of CA, or perhaps farm work provides process satisfaction to farm men (and their wives) who work longer hours.

Key Words

division of labor household work specialization time use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. (1981).A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor.Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1, pt. 2), S33-S58.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, W. K. (1990).The economic organization of the household. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant, W. K., & Zick, C. D. (1994). The economics of housespousery: An essay on household work.Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 15, 137–168.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant W. K., Gerner, J. L., & Henze, U. (1983). Estimating household production functions: A case study. In K. P. Goebel (Ed.),Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of American Council on Consumer Interests (pp. 179–183). Columbia, MO: American Council on Consumer Interests.Google Scholar
  6. Meiners, J. (1990). Off-farm work pattern and on-farm work hours of Oregon family farmers.Proceedings of the 24th Annual Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Conference (pp. 145–150). Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Northwest Policy Center.Google Scholar
  7. Olson, G. I., & Meiners, J. (1987).The Oregon family farm enterprise: Financial status and social stability. Unpublished research proposal submitted to the Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
  8. Owen, S. J. (1987). Household production and economic efficiency: Arguments for and against domestic specialization.Work, Employment and Society, 1, 157–178.Google Scholar
  9. Stafford, K., & Sanik, M. M. (1984). The effects of capital equipment on household productivity in food preparation. In I. E. Leech (Ed.),Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference for the Southeastern Regional Family Economics-Home Management Association (pp. 47–61). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geraldine I. Olson
    • 1
  • Jing J. Xiao
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Development and Family Sciences, Milam 322, HDFS, College of Home Economics and EducationOregon State UniversityCorvallis
  2. 2.College of Human Sciences and ServicesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations