Skip to main content

Spot observation: Advantages and disadvantages for household time use research

Abstract

The spot observation method of estimating time use is described in this article. Procedures for using this method in developing countries, where household activities are relatively easily observed, are contrasted with procedures used in countries characterized by very private living units and highly separated employment, educational, and household settings. Characteristics of various methods for collecting time use data are compared so that researchers can evaluate the trade-offs they can expect from selecting a particular method. A case example of using the spot observation method in a study of women's household and agricultural activities in the Njoro Region of Kenya is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Acharya, M. (1982).Time use data and the living standards measurement study (LSMS Working Paper No. 18). Washington, DC.: World Bank, Development Research Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayieko, M. A. (1989).Patterns of time use in household and agricultural activities of mothers and their children in Njoro, Kenya. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermaker, S. (1996). The dynamics of time use: Context and meaning.Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 17, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D. (1984). Time allocation: A tool for the study of cultural behavior.Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 519–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. B. (1978).A behavioral account of the division of labor among the Ye'kwana of southern Venezuela. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormuth, S. E. (1986). The sampling of experiencesin situ.Journal of Personality, 54, 262–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. (1975). Time allocation in a Machiguenga community.Ethnology, 14, 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T. (1985a). Conceptual and methodological issues involved in the measurement of time use. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford, (Eds.),Time, goods, and wellbeing (pp. 19–31). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T. (1985b). The validity and quality of time use estimates obtained from recall diaries. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford, (Eds.),Time, Goods, and Well-being (pp. 63–91). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (1989). Beeping children and adolescents: A method for studying time use and daily experience.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts.Child Development, 62, 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994).Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. G. (1979a). Collection and analysis of data on rural women's time use.Studies in Family Planning, 10, 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. G. (1979b).The negative impact of development on women reconsidered: A study of the women's education project in Upper Volta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Medford, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., Michelson, C., Koel, A., Bolton, R., & Bolton, C. (1983). Time allocation in four societies.Ethnology, 22, 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Shimmin, H. S. (1984). Children's work in four cultures: Determinants and consequences.American Anthropologist, 86, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickols, S. Y., & Srinivasan, K. (1994). Women and household production. In R. Borooah, K. Cloud, S. Seshadri, T. S. Saraswathi, J. T. Peterson, & A. Verma (Eds.),Capturing complexity: An interdisciplinary look at women, households, and development (pp. 102–122). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quizon, E. K. (1978). Time allocation and home production in rural Philippine households.Philippine Economic Journal, 17(1 & 2), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. (1985). The validity and reliability of dicries versus alternative time use measures. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 33–62). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1978). Spot observation: An introduction and examination.Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development (Rockefeller University),2 (2), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Her research interests are household time allocation and women's economic status in developing countries.

Her research interests include the time allocation of rural women and women in international development. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Illinois in 1995.

The study of women's and children's time use reported in this paper was supported in part by the Center for African Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and by the Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nickols, S.Y., Ayieko, M. Spot observation: Advantages and disadvantages for household time use research. J Fam Econ Iss 17, 281–295 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02265021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02265021

Key Words

  • comparison of research methods
  • household activities
  • spot observation
  • time use studies