Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 3–4, pp 261–280 | Cite as

The measurement of household time allocation: Data needs, analytical approaches, and standardization

  • Andrew S. Harvey
Methodological Issues in the Study of Time

Abstract

Public policy designed to improve well-being or alter social behavior has too often been ineffective because of the lack of knowledge of the nature or the trends that force people to select given time allocation patterns. In the recent past, however, there has been a growing recognition of the need to research and understand the distribution of total time to improve the ability of governments to design more effective policies. This article introduces the concept of time use measurement, reviews the development of time use research, and identifies the following key considerations for its improvement. First, a standard activity coding scheme capable of handling the nuances of time use in the more developed and developing countries and across the broad range of possible subpopulations must be developed and accepted. Second, a solid integration of objective and subjective measures into time use data collection, meeting multidisciplinary needs, must be achieved. Third, a movement toward the contextual setting of activities through episodal analysis is needed, which may mean the development of new analytical procedures and technology. Finally, it is necessary to reach a consensus on desired time-based economic, social, and psychological indicators.

Key Words

household survey methodology time use allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aas, D. (1978). Studies of time use: Problems and prospects.Acta Sociologica, 21, 125–141.Google Scholar
  2. Aas, D. (1982).Measuring the use of time (Organization for European Coordination and Development [OECD] Social Indicator Development Program: Special Study 7) (pp. 88–114). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, I. (1915). A study of the management of the farm home.Journal of Home Economics, 7, 348–353.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time.Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.Google Scholar
  5. Berk, R. A., & Berk, S. F. (1979).Labor and leisure at home: Content and organization of the household day. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Berio, A. (1980). The analysis of time allocation and activity patterns in nutrition and rural development planning.Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 6(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
  7. Berio, A. (1986). The use of time allocation data in developing countries: From influencing development policies to estimating energy requirements. In D. Aas, A. S. Harvey, E. Wnuk-Lipinski, & M.A. McInery (Eds.),Time use studies: Dimensions and applications (pp. 36–58). Helsinki: Central Statistical Office of Finland.Google Scholar
  8. Bevans, G. E. (1913).How working men spend their spare time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cain, M. T., Kahanam, S. R., & Nahar, S. (1979).Class, partiarchy, and women's work in Bangladesh. (Working paper, No. 43). New York: Center for Policy Studies, Population Council.Google Scholar
  10. Cairncross, A. K. (1958). Economic schizophrenia.Scottish Economic Journal, 5, 15–21.Google Scholar
  11. Castles, I. (1990).Measuring unpaid household work: Issues and experimental estimates (Information paper, Catalogue no. 5236.0). Sydney: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  12. Chadeau, A. (1985). Measuring household activities: Some international comparisons.Review of Income and Wealth, 31, 237–253.Google Scholar
  13. Chadeau, A., & Roy, C. (1986). Relating households' final consumption to household activities: Substitutability or complementarity between market and non-market production.Review of Income and Wealth, 32, 387–407.Google Scholar
  14. Chapin, F. S. (1974).Human activity patterns in the city: Things people do in time and in space. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, S. M., & Elliott, D. (1978).Social involvement and social diversity: An examination of social contact and location sequences. Paper presented to the World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  16. Cullen, I. G., & Godson, V. (1975). The structure of activity patterns.Progress in Planning, 4(1), 1–96.Google Scholar
  17. Elchardus, M. & Glorieux, I. (1993). Towards a semantic taxonomy: Classifying activities in the basis of their meaning. InTime use methodology: Toward concensus. (pp. 189–203). Rome: Instituto Nazionale Statistica (INSTAT).Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, D. H., Harvey, A. S., & Procos, D. (1976). An overview of the Halifax timebudget study.Society and Leisure, 3, 145–159.Google Scholar
  19. Evenson, R. E. (1982). The allocation of women's time: An international comparison.Behaviour Science Research, 17, 196–215.Google Scholar
  20. Fiebiger, H. (1989). On the methodology of time budget surveys in the GDR.Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, 6, 207–212.Google Scholar
  21. Gershuny, J. (1989). Technical change and the work/leisure balance: A new system of socio-economic accounts. In A. Silberston (Ed.),Technology and economic progress (pp. 181–215). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Gershuny, J. I., & Jones, S. (1985).Developing a multinational time-budget archive. Bath, England: School of Humanities and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  23. Godwin, D. (1991). Spouses' time allocation to household work: A review and critique.Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues, 12, 253–294.Google Scholar
  24. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1982).Unpaid work in the household. Geneva: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  25. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1987).Economic evaluations of unpaid household work: Africa, asia, Latin America and Oceania (Women, Work and Development, no. 14). Geneva, International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, A. S. (1978a). The role of time-budgets in national and regional economic accounting. In W. Michelson (Ed.),Public policy in temporal perspective (pp. 11–22). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, A. S. (1978b).Discretionary time activities in context (Occasional paper no. 3). Halifax: Institute of Public Affairs, Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, A. S. (1993a). Objective and subjective approaches to the measurement of work. InTime use methodology: Toward concensus (pp. 189–203). Rome: Instituto Nazionale Statistica (INSTAT).Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, A. S. (1993b). Guidelines for time use collection.Social Indicators Research, 30 (2/3), 197–228.Google Scholar
  30. Harvey, A. S., Elliott, D. H. (1983).Time and time again: Vol. 4.Explorations in time use. Ottawa: Department of Communications, Employment and Immigration.Google Scholar
  31. Harvey, A. S., Elliott, D. H., & Stone, P. J. (1977).Review of analytic and descriptive methods of time use data: A working paper. Halifax: Dalhousie University, Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  32. Harvey, A. S., & Macdonald, S. (1976). Extension of economic accounts to include non-market activities: Data considerations.Journal of Social Indicators Research, 3(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
  33. Harvey, A. S., MacDonald, E. G., Macdonald, W. S., Elliott, D. H., Clark, S. M. & Wood, K. S. (1980).A blueprint for core social indicators: Meeting social data needs of the 1980s. Halifax: Dalhousie University, Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  34. Harvey, A. S., & Procos, D. (1974, August).Suburb and satellite contrasted: An exploration of activity patterns and urban form (Report 25). Presented to the Third Advanced Studies Institute in Regional Science, Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
  35. Harvey, A. S., Szalai, A., Elliott, D. H., Stone, P. J., & Clark, S. M. (1984).Time budget research: An International Social Science Council (ISSC) workbook in comparative analysis. New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Hawrylyshyn, O. (1976). The value of household services: A survey of empirical estimates.Review of Income and Wealth, 22, 101–131.Google Scholar
  37. Heidemann, C., & Heinzmann, U. (1975).Die situation der verheirateten berufstatigen frau mit kindern in iher stadtischen umwelt. Karlsruhe: Institut fur Regionalwissensschaft der Universitat Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  38. Hobson, R., & Mann, S. H. (1975). A social indicator based on time allocation.Social Indicators Research, 1, 439–457.Google Scholar
  39. INSEE. (1987).Time use in France in 1985–1986 (Primiers Resultats). Paris: INSEE.Google Scholar
  40. INSTRAW. (1995).Measurement and valuation of unpaid contribution: Accounting through time and output. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Institute for Research and Training for the Advancement of Women.Google Scholar
  41. Ironmonger, D. (1985).Household work: Productive activities, women and income in household economy. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  42. Juster, F. T. (1973). A framework for the measurement of economic and social performance. In M. Moss (Ed.),The measurement of economic and social performance (pp. 26–109). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  43. Juster, F. T. (1985a). A note on recent changes in time use. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 313–332). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  44. Juster, F. T. (1985b). Preferences for work and leisure. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 333–351). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  45. Kalton, G. (1985). Sample design issues in time diary studies. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 93–112). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  46. Linder, S. B. (1970).The harried leisure class. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lundberg, G. A., Komarousky, M., & McInery, M. A. (1934).Leisure: A suburban study. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  48. McSweeney, B. (1979). Collection and analysis of data on rural women's time use.Studies of Family Planning, 10, (11–12), 379–383.Google Scholar
  49. Michelson, W. (1986). The empirical merger of objective and subjective aspects of daily life. In D. Aas, A. S. Harvey, E. Wnuk-Lipinski, & I. Niemi (Eds.),Time use studies: Dimensions and applications (pp. 176–188). Helsinki: Central Statistical Office of Finland.Google Scholar
  50. Michelson, W. (1988). Divergent convergence: The daily routines of employed spouses as a public affairs agenda. In C. Andrew & B. M. Milroy (Eds.),Life spaces: Gender, household, employment (pp. 81–101). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  51. Niemi, I. (Ed.) (1995).Time use of women in Europe and North America. New York: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women.Google Scholar
  52. O'Conghaile, W., & Kohler, E. (Eds.). (1991).The changing use of time: Report from an international workshop. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  53. Pas, E. I. (1986). Multiday samples, parameter estimation precision, and data collection costs for least squares regression trip-generation models.Environment and Planning A, 18, 17–27.Google Scholar
  54. Pyatt, G. (1990). Accounting for time use.Review of Income and Wealth, 36, 33–52.Google Scholar
  55. Robinson, J. P. (1977).How Americans use time: A social-psychological analysis of everyday behaviour. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  56. Robinson, J. P. (1984). Work, free-time, and the quality of life. In M. D. Lee & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.),Management of work and personal life (pp. 133–142). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  57. Robinson, J. P. (1988). Time-diary evidence about the social psychology of everyday life. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.),The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 134–148). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Sanik, M. M. (1983). Repeated measure design: A time use application.Home Economics Research Journal, 12, 122–126.Google Scholar
  59. Shaw, S. M. (1986). Leisure, recreation or free time? Measuring time usage.Journal of Leisure Research, 18, 177–189.Google Scholar
  60. Sirageldin, I. (1969).Non-market components of national income. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, A. (1981). The informal economy.Lloyd's Bank Review, 141, 45–61.Google Scholar
  62. Sorokin, P.A., & Berger, C. Q. (1939).Time budgets of human behaviour, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Soule, G. (1955). The economy of time. In G. Soule (Ed.),Time for living (pp. 86–101). New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  64. Szalai, A. (1972).The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
  65. Tewari, J. N. (1988). Observation and recall method for collecting data on women's activities: An experiment in India.Bulletin of Labour Statistics, 4, 9–14.Google Scholar
  66. United Nations (1991).The world's women, 1970–1990: Trends and statistics (Social Statistics and Indicators, Series K, No. 8) New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  67. Urdaneta-Ferran, L. (1986, October).Measuring and valuing women's participation in the informal sector of the economy. Presented at the Expert Group on Measurement of Women's Income and Their Participation and Production in the Informal Sector, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.Google Scholar
  68. Walker, K. E., & Woods, M. E. (1976).Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association, Center for the Family.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew S. Harvey
    • 1
  1. 1.Time Use Research ProgramSaint Mary's UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations