Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 3–4, pp 245–260 | Cite as

Money illusion: The importance of household time use in social policy making

  • Robert T. Michael
An Overview of Household Time Use Issues

Abstract

The paper discusses the reasons for and the implications of the fact that social science does not adequately measure the uses of time or the products of its use. This is called a “money illusion” because typically we focus on the monetary component of many issues, ignoring the equally important time component because it is difficult to quantify. This money illusion affects policy decisions, which are based on faulty or less than complete information. The paper details several examples, including measuring income growth and its distribution; assessing poverty status; calculating family investments in children; setting child support guidelines; assessing the benefits of marriage; and understanding adult sexual behavior.

Key Words

poverty and children real income social policy time value 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bassi, L. J., & Barnow, B. S. (1991).Expenditures on children and child support guidelines. Urban Institute Mimeo, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time.Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.Google Scholar
  3. Betson, D., Evenhouse, E., Reilly, S., & Smolensky, E. (1992). Trade-offs implicit in child-support guidelines.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 1–20.Google Scholar
  4. Cain, G. C. (1971). Issues in economics of a population policy for the United States.American Economic Review, 61(2), 408–417.Google Scholar
  5. Chelimsky, E. (1991). On the social science contribution to governmental decision-making.Science, 254, 226–231.Google Scholar
  6. Daniel, K. (1992).Does marriage make men more productive? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Desai, S. P., Chase-Lansdale, L., & Michael, R. T. (1989). Mother or market? Effects of maternal employment on the intellectual ability of 4-year-old children.Demography, 26, 545–561.Google Scholar
  8. Espenshade, T. J. (1977). The value and cost of children. (Population Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 1). Washington, D.C.: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  9. Espenshade, T. J. (1984).Investing in children. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Gottschalk, P., & Mayer, S. E. (1994).Changes in home production and trends in economic inequality. (Mimeo). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  11. Greeley, A., Michael, R. T., & Smith, T. W. (1990). Americans and their sexual partners.Society, 27(5), 36–42.Google Scholar
  12. Gronau, R. (1980). Home production—A forgotten industry.Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 408–416.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, M. S. (1985). Patterns of time use. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 133–176). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  14. Juster, F. T. (1985). Investments of time by men and women. In: F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.)Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 177–204). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  15. Juster, F. T., Courant, P. N., & Dow, G. K. (1985). A conceptual framework for the analysis of time allocation data. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.),Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 113–132). Ann Arbor. University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  16. Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (Eds.). (1985).Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  17. Lazear, E. P., & Michael, R. T. (1988).Allocation of income within the household. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lewin/ICF Company. (1990).Estimates of expenditures on children and child support guidelines. (Report submitted to Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.Google Scholar
  19. Linder, S. B. (1970).The harried leisure class. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Maccoby, E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992).Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Michael, R. T. (1972).The effect of education on efficiency in consumption. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Michael, R. T. (1985). Consequences of the rise in female labor force participation rates: Questions and probes.Journal of Labor Economics, 3 (Supplement), S117-S146.Google Scholar
  23. Michael, R. T., Laumann, E., Gagnon, J. H., & Smith, T. W. (1988). Number of sex partners and potential risk of sexual exposure to HIV.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 37, 565–568.Google Scholar
  24. Peters, H. E., Argys, L. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1993). Enforcing divorce settlements: Evidence from child support compliance and award modifications.Demography, 30, 719–735.Google Scholar
  25. Reed, R. H., & McIntosh, S. (1972). Costs of children. In E. R. Morss & R. H. Reed (Eds.),Economic Aspects of Population Change (U.S. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. Research Reports, Vol. II) (pp. 333–350). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  26. Robinson, J. P. (1977).How Americans use time: A social-psychological analysis of everyday behavior. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Sirageldin, I. A.-H. (1969).Non-market components of national income. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  28. Vickery, C. (1977). The time-poor: A new look at poverty.Journal of Human Resources 12, 27–48.Google Scholar
  29. Walker, K. E., & Woods, M. E. (1976).Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association, Center for the Family.Google Scholar
  30. Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. J. (1985). Children as collective goods and divorce settlements.Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 268–292.Google Scholar
  31. Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. J. (1993). Transfers among divorced couples: Evidence and Interpretation.Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 629–679.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert T. Michael
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies at the University of ChicagoChicago
  2. 2.NORC, Harris Graduate SchoolUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations