Abstract
This paper examines the influence of social darwinian and eugenic ideologies on paradigms of marriage, sex, and motherhood from 1900 until the present time. Two major ideological trends of the new entrepreneurial class in England and the United States after the Industrial Revolution concerned 1) increasing the marriage and fertility rates of middle and upper class white women; and 2) establishing early parental bonding between these same women and their infants to ensure the perpetuation of (white) “race culture”. These ideological concerns are evident in post-1900 eugenically-oriented journals and books on sex and marriage, which discuss increasing marriage and fertility rates of middle and upper class white women, including the postponement of intellectual studies until after the active reproductive period; eugenicist education, selective sterilization of ‘unfit’ women; and the glorification of sexual intercourse for women. Funding for basic research on reproductive sex, sponsored by the National Research Council, was based in these ideological trends. After WWII blatant eugenic ideologies disappeared. However, post WWII research on mother-infant bonding or attachment gave support to earlier eugenic ideals. Recent examples of the continuation of social darwinian influences, as well as their social and legal implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberle, S. D., & Corner, G. W. (1953).Twenty-Five Years of Sex Research: History of The National Research Council Committee for Research in Problems of Sex 1922–1947. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Ainsworth, M. D. (1962). The effects of maternal deprivation: a review of findings and controversy in the context of research strategy. InDeprivation of Maternal Care: A reassment of its effects. (Public Health Papers, No. 14, pp. 87–195). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Ainsworth, M. D., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development.American Psychologist, 46(4), 333–341.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behaviour of one-year-olds in a strange situation. In B. M. Foss (Ed.),Determinants of Infant Behavior (vol. 4, pp. 111–136). London: Metheun.
Bell, A. G. (1914). How to improve the race.Journal of Heredity, 5(1), 1–7.
Belsky, J. (1988). The effects of infant day care reconsidered.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 235–272.
Blacker, C. P. (1952).Eugenics: Galton and After. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co., Ltd.
Bleier, R. (1984).Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon Press.
Bowlby, J. (1951).Maternal Care and Mental Health: A Report Proposed on Behalf of the World Health Organization as a Contribution to the United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Bowlby, J. (1952).Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Bowlby, J. (1969).Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973).Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J., & Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1965).Child Care and The Growth of Love (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Bowlby, J., Ainsworth, M. D., Boston, M., & Rosenbluth, D. (1956). Effects of mother-child separation.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 29, 169–201.
Boyer, R. O., & Morais, H. M. (1955).Labor's Untold Story. New York: United Electrical, Radio & Macine Workers of America.
Braverman, L. B. (1989). Beyond the myth of motherhood. In M. McGoldrick, C. M. Anderson, & F. Walsh (Eds.),Women and Families. New York: Free Press, pp. 227–243.
Brown, E. R. (1979).Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crew, F. A. E. (1933). Ten years of sex research [Review ofSex and Internal secretions].Journal of Heredity, 24(6), 249–251.
Cutting of genitals filmed; four arrested. (1994, September 5).Fayetteville Observer Times. p. 8A.
Darwin, C. (1959).The Origin of Species. New York: The Modern Library.
Darwin, C. (1871).The Descent of Man. New York: The Modern Library.
Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1973).Witches, Midwives, and Nurses: A History of Women Healers. Old Westbury, New York: The Feminist Press.
Engels, F. (1884/1972).Origin of The Family, Private Property and The State. New York: International.
Eugenics in the colleges. (1914).Journal of Heredity, 5(4), 186.
Flexner, E. (1959, 1975 rev. ed.).Century of Struggle. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Frank, L. K. (1939). Family planning and cultural change.Journal of Heredity, 30(6), 273–278.
Freud, S. (1962).Three Contributions to The Theory of Sex. New York: Dutton. (Original work published in 1920)
Galton, F. (1914). Conclusion to memories of my life.Journal of Heredity, 5 (12), 560.
Gergen, K. J. (1994). Exploring the postmodern perils or potentials?American Psychologist, 49(5), 412–415.
Goodman, L. A., Koss, M. P., Fitzgerald, L. F., Russo, N. F., & Keita, G. P. (1993). Male violence against women: current research and future directions.American Psychologist, 48(10), 1054–1058.
Gordon, L. (1974).Women's Bodies, Women's Rights. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
Gordon, M., & Shankweiler, P. J. (1970). Mate choice and domesticlife in the nineteenth-century marriage manual.Journal of Marriage and The Family, 32, 665–674.
Gruenberg, S. M. (1930). Eugenics and child study.Journal of Heredity, 30(3), 117–120.
Hall, G. S. (1909). Education in sex hygiene.The Eugenics Review, 1(4), 242–253.
Haraway, D. (1989).Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in The World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. J. (1991).Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Harding, M. E. (1933).The Way of All Women. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
Harlow, H., & Mears, C. (1979).The Human Model: Primate Perspectives. New York: Wiley.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994).The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
Himmelfarb, G. (1959).Darwin and The Darwinian Revolution. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Hirsch, I. S. Poverty comes home: women and children in the 90's. (1991).Clearinghouse Review 24 (4). Chicago, Illinois: National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc.
In re Custody of Maranda Kate Ireland-Smith; Jennifer Ireland v. Steven J. Smith, No. 177431 (Michigan Court of Appeals), 1994).
Johnson, R. H. (1914). Marriage selection.Journal of Heredity, 5(3), 102–110.
Kamin, L. (1974).The Science and Politics of I.Q. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Keogh, T. (1993, Jan/Feb). Children without a conscience.New Age Journal, 53–57, 128–130.
Kevles, Daniel J. (1985).In The Name of Eugenics. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in The Human Male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Kinsey, A. C., Martin, C. E., Pomeroy, W. B., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in The Human Female. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
Koss, M. P. (1993). Rape.American Psychologist, 48(10), 1062–1069.
Leslie, R. M. (1911). Women's progress in relation to eugenics.The Eugenics Review, 2(4), 282–298.
Lewonton, R. C., Ross, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984).Not in Our Genes. New York: Pantheon Books.
Long, H. W. (1919).Sane Sex Life and Sane Sex Living. New York: Eugenics Publishing Co., Inc.
Lowry, T. P. (1978).The Classic Clitoris. Chicago, Il: Nelson-Hall.
May, E. T. (1988).Homeward Bound. New York: Basic Books.
Mazumdar, P. M. H. (1992).Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, Its Sources and Its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge.
McConaghy, N. (1979). Maternal deprivation: can its ghost be laid?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 13(3), 209–217.
Morawski, J. G. (1982). Assessing psychology's moral heritage through our neglected utopias.American Psychologist, 37(10), 1082–1095.
Murder charge out in breast milk case. (1994, September 10).Fayetteville Observer-Times. p. 3A.
Notes of The Quarter: Deprivation as a cause of problem families (1951).The Eugenics Review, 43(3), 119–122.
Notes of The Quarter: Obituary of Margaret Sanger. (1966).The Eugenics Review, 58(4), 179–181.
Nystrom, A. (1912).The Natural Laws of Sexual Life. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Company.
Popenoe, P. (1984). Marriage counseling. In C. Rosenberg (Ed.).The History of Hereditarian Thought: A Decade of Progress in Eugenics.Scientific Papers of the 3rd International Congress of Eugenics, New York, 1932 (pp. 210–221). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Popenoe, P., & Johnson, R. H. (1922).Applied Egenics. New York: Macmillan Co.
Rabinowitz, M. F. (1984). The heredity-environment controversy: A victorian legacy.Canadian Psychology, 25(3), 159–166.
Ravenhill, A. (1909). Eugenic ideals for womanhood.The Eugenics Review, 1(4), 265–274.
Reprint and Circular Series of the National Research Council: A History of the National Research Council 1919–1933. (1933). Washington, D. C.: Scholarly Resources, Inc.
Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: science, social values, and the study of women.American Psychologist, 47(6), 730–740.
Rifkin, J. (1983).Algeny. New York: The Viking Press.
Robie, T. J. (1984). Selective sterilization for race culture. In C. Rosenberg (Ed.).The History of Hereditarian Thought: A Decade of Progressin Eugenics.Scientific Papers of the 3rd International Congress of Eugenics, New York, 1932 (pp. 201–209), New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Robinson, W. J. (1916).Birth Control or The Limitation of Offspring. New York: The Critic and Guide Co.
Rosenberg, C. (Ed.).The History of Hereditarian Thought: A Decade of Progressin Eugenics. Scientific Papers of the 3rd International Congress of Eugenics, New York, 1932 (pp. 201-209), New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Rothman, B. K. (1987). Comment on Harrison: The commodification of motherhood.Gender & Society, 1(3), 312–316.
Rowbotham, S. (1973).Hidden From History. London: Pluto Press.
Rutter, M. A. (1991). A fresh look at “maternal deprivation”. In Bateson, P. (Ed.).The Development and Integration of Behavior: Essays in Honour of Robert Hinde (pp. 331–374). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saleeby, C. W. (1909). The psychology of parenthood.The Eugenic Review, 1(1), 37–46.
Siegel, L. (1990). The criminalization of pregnant and child-rearing drug users.Drug Law Report, 17(4), 6–10.
Silverstein, L. B. (1991). Transforming the debate about child care and maternal employment.American Psychologist, 46(10), 1025–1032.
Slaughter, J. W. (1909). Selection in marriage.The Eugenics Review, 1(3), 150–162.
Spencer, H. (1978).The Principles of Ethics (Vol. 1). Indianapolis: Liberty Classics. (Original work published in 1897).
Spencer, H. (1978).The Principles of Ethics (Vol. 2). Indianapolis: Liberty Classics. (Original work published in 1897).
Spencer, H. (1961).The Study of Sociology. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. (Original work published in 1880).
Spencer, H. (1858).First Principles. New York: The DeWill Revolving Fund, Inc.
Tiefer, L. (1986). In pursuit of the perfect penis.American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 579–599.
Thompson, D. (1949, May). Race suicide of the intelligent.Ladies Home Journal, 11.
Thompson, R. A. (1991). Infant day care: concerns, controversies, choices. In J. V. Lerner (Ed.).Employed Mothers and Their Children. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
VandeVelde, Th. H. (1926).Ideal Marriage: Its Physiology and Technique. New York: Random House.
Van-IJzendoorn, M. H. (1990). Developments in cross-cultural research on attachment: some methodological notes.Human Development, 33 (1), 3–9.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1973).Mind and Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franzblau, S.H. Social darwinian influences on conceptions of marriage, sex, and motherhood. J Primary Prevent 17, 47–73 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02262738
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02262738