Skip to main content
Log in

Limits of determination and calibration in HPLC

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In HPLC calibration the expressions lowest calibration limit and determination limit are defined in statistical terms. The lowest calibration limit is the minimum mass in the measured series of calibration points. It is calculated from the confidence interval of the inverse of the calibration function as the lowest mass limit that may be differentiated from zero mass with a preset probability of error. If the calculated lowest calibration limit is lower than the actual data, points at lower concentration may be measured. The determination limit is the smallest concentration of an analysis that is differentiated from the concentration zero or an apparent blind value in the calibration curve with a given probability of error.

Using two different UV-detectors (variable wavelength and photodiode-array) the lowest calibration limit is experimentally evaluated and compared with specific data for the detectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Kaiser, Spectrochim. Acta3, 40 (1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. Currie, Anal. Chem.40, 586–593 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Hubaux, G. Vos, Anal. Chem.42, 849–855 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IUPAC, Spectrochim. Acta33B, 242 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. ACS Subcommittee Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Anal. Chem.52, 2242 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Dammann, W. Funk, G. Oehlmann, C. Vonderheid, Vom Wasser58, 207 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Funk, V. Dammann, C. Vonderheid, G. Oehlmann, Statistische Methoden in der Wasserchemie; VCH Verlagsges. Weinheim 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ebel, U. Kamm, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem.316, 382–385 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Ebel in S. Ebel, W. Dorner (Edit.), parat Jahrbuch Chemielabor 1987 (S. 107–118).

  10. S. Ebel, U. Becht, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. (im Druck).

  11. H. M. N. Irving, H. Freiser, T. S. West, Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature (Definite IUPAC Rules 1977); Pergamon Press Oxford 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. L. Draper, H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis: Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Ebel, Comput. Anwend. Lab.1, 55–61 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. A. John, W. J. McCarthy, J. D. Winefordner, Anal. Chem.39, 1495–97 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. P. Foley, Chromatographia18, 50 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. E. Knoil, J. Chrom. Sci.23, 422 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Ebel inH. Engelhardt, K. P. Hupe (Edit.), Kopplungsverfahren in der HPLC, GIT Verlag Darmstadt 1985 (S. 28).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. F. Fett, B. J. Clark, H. P. Scott, J. Chromatogr.,316, 423 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. E. Bayer, Tübingen on ocassion of his 60th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebel, S., Kühnert, H. & Mück, W. Limits of determination and calibration in HPLC. Chromatographia 23, 934–938 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261474

Key Words

Navigation