Skip to main content
Log in

The micro-trap: An alternative to cryofocussing in capillary gas chromatography

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For routine analyses involving numerous samples or for field operation of on-site instruments, cryogenic traps are inconvenient: their operation is timeconsuming and automation is technically demanding. complete trapping and efficient band-focussing may be achieved at ambient temperature with micro-traps packed with suitable sorbents. Two approaches have been evaluated: if the boiling points of the analytes are within a range of about 100°C, a single-sorbent trap and direct coupling to the column are recommended; for samples containing components wih widely different volatilities, a trap composed of two or more segments with complementary affinties and coupling to the chromatographic column under carrier-gas flow-reversion is preferable. The procedure has been evaluated for airborne C1 and C2-halocarbons; it is also applicable to trace analysis of other volatile organic air pollutants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Schonburg, H. Husmann, F. Weeke, J. Chrom.112, 205 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Berg, A. Johnsson, J. Hih Resol. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun.7, 687 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Noj, P. Fabian, R. Burchers, F. Janssen, C. Cramers, J. Rijks, J. Chrom.393, 343 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. W. Graydon, K. Grob, F. Zuercher, W. Giger, J. Chrom.285, 307 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S., Jacobsson, J. High Resol. Chrom. Chrom. Commun.7, 185 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. F. Punkow, J. M. Isabelle, T. J. Kristensen, Anal. Chem.54, 1815 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Pankow, J. High Resol. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun.6, 292 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. W. Graydon, K. Grob, J. Chrom.254, 265 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. A. Hurrell, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography, Vol. I (1987), 445–452, Huethig, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. D. Pellizzari, K. J. Krost, S. G. Walburn, S. A. Hubbard, Anal. Chem.54, 810 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Frank, W. Frank, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem.332, 115 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Müller, M. Oehme, J High Resol. Chromatogr.13, 34 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Kelker, E. Heil, H. Oeser, R. Hatz, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem.297, 357 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. R. Rohwer, V. Pretorius, P. J. Apps, J. High Resol. Chromatogr.9, 295 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Grob, G. Grob, J. High Resol. Chromatogr.6, 133 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Raymond, G. Guiochon, J. Chrom. Sci.13, 173 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Sandra, I. Temmermann, M. Verstappe, J. High Resol. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun.6, 501 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. R. Deans, Chromatographia1, 18 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, W., Frank, H. The micro-trap: An alternative to cryofocussing in capillary gas chromatography. Chromatographia 29, 571–574 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261224

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02261224

Key Words

Navigation