Relationships between affective components and sexual behaviors in sexual aggressors

  • Jean Proulx
  • André McKibben
  • Richard Lusignan
Clinical and Research Articles

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to verify whether relationships exist in sexual aggressors between affective components (moods and emotions following conflicts) and sexual behaviors (fantasies and masturbatory activities during such fantasies). We therefore developed the “Fantasy Report”, a self-assessment method for recording affective components and sexual behaviors. Nineteen rapists, 12 heterosexual pedophiles, and 8 homosexual pedophiles filled out the Fantasy Report every 2 days for 2 months. In rapists and heterosexual pedophiles, negative moods and conflicts coincided with overwhelming deviant sexual fantasies and increased masturbatory activities during such fantasies. For the homosexual pedophiles, the data revealed a significant relationship only between affective components and deviant sexual fantasies. The emotions most frequently reported were anger, loneliness, and humiliation by the rapists, loneliness and humiliation by the heterosexual pedophiles, and loneliness by the homosexual pedophiles. These data are discussed on the basis of the Relapse Prevention Model.

Key Words

affective components pedophilia rape relapse prevention sexual fantasies sexual offender assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbaree, H. E. (1990). Stimulus control of sexual arousal: Its role in sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.),Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 115–142). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  2. Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980).Statistical methods in cancer research. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  3. Howells, K. (1978). Some meanings of children for pedophiles. In M. Cook & G. Wilson (Eds.),Love and attraction (pp. 57–82). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hudson, S. M., Ward, T., & France, K. G. (1992). The abstinence violation effect in regressed and fixated child molesters.Annals of Sex Research, 5, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hudson, S. M., Ward, T., & Marshall, W. L. (1992). The abstinence violation effect in sex offenders: A reformulation.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 435–441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mantel, N., & Haenszel, P. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marshall, W. L. (1989). Intimacy, loneliness, and sexual offenders.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 491–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McKibben, A., Proulx, J., & Lusignan, R. (1994). Relationships between conflict, affect and deviant sexual behaviors in rapists and pedophiles.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 571–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Paradis, Y. (1994).La pédophilie homosexuelle: Une étude de cas multiples par l'approche de la prévention de la rechute. Unpublished dissertation, Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
  10. Pithers, W. D. (1990). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressors: A method for maintaining therapeutic gain and enhancing external supervision. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.),Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 343–361). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  11. Pithers, W. D., Marques, J. K., Gibat, C. C., & Marlatt, G. A. (1983). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressives: A self-control model of treatment and maintenance change. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.),The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 214–239). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  12. Pithers, W. D., Kashima, K. M., Cumming, G. F., Beal, L. S., & Buell, M. M. (1988). Relapse prevention of sexual aggression. In R. A. Prentky & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.)Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (pp. 244–260). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  13. Proulx, J., Aubut, J., McKibben, A., & Côté, M. (1994). Penile responses of rapists and nonrapists to rape stimuli involving physical violence or humiliation.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 295–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1994). The abstinence violation effect in child molesters.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 431–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ward, T., Louden, K., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1994).A descriptive model of the offense chain for child molesters. Paper presented at the 13th annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. San Francisco, CA, Nov.Google Scholar
  16. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Siegert, R. J. (1995). A critical comment on Pithers' relapse prevention model.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 167–175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Proulx
    • 1
    • 2
  • André McKibben
    • 1
  • Richard Lusignan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Philippe Pinel de MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Ecole de Criminologie, Centre International de Criminologie ComparéeUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations