Advertisement

Hydrobiological Bulletin

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 196–208 | Cite as

Avoidance of macrophytes and additional notes on avoidance of the shore by ‘Acanthodiaptomus denticornis’ (Wierzejski, 1887) from Lake Pavin (Auvergne, France)

  • Jaap Dorgelo
  • Kees Koning
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Literature on the horizontal distribution patterns from the littoral zone into the open water of fresh-water zooplankton is reviewed. The results of experiments on the avoidance of macrophytes and of the shore are presented.

     
  2. 2.

    In the lightAcanthodiaptomus avoidedMyriophyllum andPotamogeton as well as plastic plants in aquaria. The repelling effect of the macrophytes was stronger than that of the plastic plants. In the dark the avoidance reaction was absent, showing that both living and plastic plants exert a repellent ‘shading effect’ onAcanthodiaptomus, and supporting that macrophytes militate against zooplankton due to the secretion of repelling substances that is coupled with photosynthesis.

     
  3. 3.

    When a shore was gently slopingAcanthodiaptomus avoided the shore where trees (at a distance of 20 m of the waterside) were present; this reaction did not occur where, about 100 m further, meadows bordered the lake.

     
  4. 4.

    Adults were far more abundant in the littoral zone during the night as compared with day-time. This phenomenon was less distinct in the copepodites and absent in the nauplii.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DORGELO, JAAP, 1979. Avoidance of the shore ofAcanthodiaptomus denticornis (Wierzejski, 1887) in Lake Pavin (Auvergne, France). Ann. Stat. Biol. Besse-en-Chandesse, No. 13: 197–208.Google Scholar
  2. ELGMORK, K., 1964. On the relation between lake and pond zooplankton. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 16:216–221.Google Scholar
  3. ELSTER, H.-J. und I. SCHWOERBEL, 1970. Beiträge zur Biologie und Populationsdynamik der Daphnien im Bodensee. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl., 38:18–72.Google Scholar
  4. FLOSSNER, D., 1964. Zur Cladocerenfauna des Stechlinsee-Gebietes. II. Okologische Untersuchungen über die littoralen Arten/Limnologica, 2:35–103.Google Scholar
  5. GEORGE, D.G. and R.W. EDWARDS, 1973.Daphnia distribution within Langmuir circulations. Limnol. Oceanogr., 18:798–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. GLIWICZ, M., 1967. Zooplankton and temperature-oxygen conditions of two alpine lakes of the Tatra Mountains. Po. Arch. Hydrobiol., 14:53–72.Google Scholar
  7. GOULDEN, G.E., 1971. Environmental control of the abundance and distribution of the chydorid Cladocera. Limnol. Oceanogr., 16:320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GREEN, J., 1967. The distribution and variation ofDaphnia lumholtzi (Crustacea: Cladocera) in relation to fish predation in Lake Albert, East Africa. J. Zool., 151:181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. HART, R.C., 1978. Horizontal distribution of the copepodPseudodiaptomus hessei in subtropical Lake Sibaya. Freshwater Biology, 8:415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HASLER, A.D. and E. JONES, 1949. Demonstration of the antagonistic action of large aquatic plants on algae and rotifers. Ecology, 30:359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HEBERT, P.D.N., A.G. GOOD and M.A. MORT, 1980. Induced swarming in the predatory copepodHeterocope septentrionalis. Limnol. Oceanogr., 25:747–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. HERBST, H.V., 1955. Untersuchungen zur quantitativen Verteilung des Zooplanktons in Grossen Plöner See. Arch. Hydrobiol., 50:234–290.Google Scholar
  13. HUTCHINSON, G.E., 1967. A treatise on limnology. II. Introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1115p.Google Scholar
  14. KAIRESALO, T., 1980. Diurnal fluctuations within a littoral plankton community in oligotrophic Lake Pääjärvi, southern Finland. Freshwater Biology, 10:533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. KEEN, R., 1973. A probabilistic approach to the dynamics of the Chydoridea (Cladocera, Crustacea). Ecology, 54:524–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. KERFOOT, W.C., 1975. The divergence of adjacent populations. Ecology, 56:1298–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MIRACLE, M.R., 1975. Segregation of zooplankton populations in several depressions within one lake basin. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 19:1140–1149.Google Scholar
  18. OMALY, N., 1968. Le Lac Pavin. Historique et hydrobiologie. Rev. Sc. Nat. d'Auvergne, 34:7–31.Google Scholar
  19. PENNAK, R.W., 1966. Structure of zooplankton populations in the littoral macrophyte zone of some Colorado lakes. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc., 85:329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PENNAK, R.W., 1973. Some evidence for aquatic macrophytes as repellents for a limnetic species ofDaphnia. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol., 58:569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PONYI, J., J.N. HORVATH and N.P. ZANKAI, 1975. Investigations on planktonic Crustacea in Lake Balaton. VI. Quantitative changes in theEudiaptomus gracilis population at various regions of Lake Balaton. Ann. Inst. Biol. Acad. Sci. Hung. (Tihany), 42:203–218.Google Scholar
  22. PREISSLER, K., 1977. Do rotifers show ‘avoidance of the shore’? Oecologia, 27:253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. QUADE, H.W., 1969. Cladoceran faunas associated with aquatic macrophytes in some lakes in northwestern Minnesota. Ecology, 50:170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. QUADE, H.W., 1971. Niche specificity of littoral Cladocera: habitat. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc., 90:104–105.Google Scholar
  25. RUTTNER, F., 1962. Grundriss der Limnologie. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 3e Aufl., 332p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SHIEL, R.J., 1976. Associations of Entomostraca with weedbed habitats in a billabong of the Goulburn River, Victoria. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 27:533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SIEBECK, O., 1960. Die Bedeutung von Alter und Geschlecht für die Horizontalverteilung planktischer Crustaceen im Lunzer Obersee. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol., 45:125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SIEBECK, O., 1968. ‘Uferflucht’ und optische Orientierung pelagischer Crustaceen. Arch. Hydrobiol./Suppl., 35:1–118.Google Scholar
  29. SIEBECK, O., 1973. Untersuchungen zur Biotopbindung einheimischer Pelagial-Crustaceen. Verh. d. Ges. Őkologie, Saarbrücken 11–24.Google Scholar
  30. SMIRNOV, N.N., 1963a. On the inshore Cladocera of the Volga water reservoirs. Hydrobiologia, 21:166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SMIRNOV, N.N., 1963b. On the seasonal distribution of inshore Cladocera of the Wolga water reservoirs. Hydrobiologia, 22:202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SMYLY, W.J.P., 1952. The Entomostraca of the weeds of a moorland pool. J. Anim. Ecol., 21:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SMYLY, W.J.P., 1958. Distribution and seasonal abundance of Entomostraca in moorland ponds near Windermere. Hydrobiologia, 11:59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. STRASKRABA, M., 1965. Contributions to the productivity of the littoral region of pools and ponds. I. Quantitative study of the littoral zooplankton of the rich vegetation of the backwater Labicko. Hydrobiologia, 24:421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. WESENBERG-LUND, C., 1930. Contributions to the biology of the Rotifera. II. The periodicity and sexual periods. Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., naturv. og mathem., 9:1–230.Google Scholar
  36. WHITESIDE, M.C., J.B. WILLIAMS and C.P. WHITE, 1978. Seasonal abundance and pattern of chydorid Cladocera in mud and vegetative habitats. Ecology, 59:1177–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. YOUNG, J.P.W., 1978. Sexual swarms inDaphnia magna, a cyclic parthenogen. Freshwater Biology, 8:279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ZARET, T.M., 1969. Predation-balanced polymorphism ofCeriodaphnia cornuta Sars. Limnol. Oceanogr., 14:301–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Netherlands Hydrobiological Society 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaap Dorgelo
    • 1
  • Kees Koning
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Aquatic EcologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations