Advertisement

Hydrobiological Bulletin

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 142–151 | Cite as

Effects of laundry wastewater on benthic algae in ditches in the Netherlands

  • S. P. Klapwijk
Article

Summary

A modified, artificial substrate method was used to study the effects of laundry wastewater on benthic algae in a polder in the western part of the Netherlands. In a polluted ditch a clear chemical gradient was found with regard to the parameters conductivity, B.O.D., C.O.D., NH4, ortho-P, total-P and Cl, showing decreasing values with increasing distance from the polluting source. pH and oxygen values showed the opposite. Algae, such asEuglena viridis, Nitzschia palea andOscillatoria spp. were positively correlated with the amount of pollution, while others, such asChrysochaete brittannica, Chrysophaera gallica, Cocconeis placentula andSynedra ulna showed a negative correlation with the amount of pollution. The results of algal counts are evaluated by means of diffenent methods,e.g. similarity coefficients, species abundance curves, diversity and saprobity indices. In different seasons benthic algal biomass proved to be a good indicator of pollution, except very close to the polluting source. The role of algal periodicity, influencing species composition, diversity and saprobity values, and biomass growth, has been discussed. The need of revising the saprobity system for stagnant ditches in the Netherlands, using artificial substrates, has been stressed.

Keywords

Algal Biomass Similarity Coefficient Biomass Growth Artificial Substrate Benthic Alga 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BERGH, M.L.E., J. VAN DOORN and P. BOS, 1978. Effect of manure run-off on phosphate adsorption characteristics of polderditch sediments. Verkenningen I.V.M.-VU serie C, no. 9, (Free University, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  2. BUTCHER, R.W., 1940. Studies in the ecology of rivers IV. Observations on the growth and distribution of the sessile algae in the river Hull, Yorkshire. J.Ecol., 28:210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BUTCHER, R.W., 1946. Studies in the ecology of rivers VI. The algal growth in certain highly calcareous streams. J.Ecol., 33:268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BUTCHER, R.W., 1949. Problems of distribution of sessile algae in running water. Verh. Internat. Ver. Limnol., 10:98–103.Google Scholar
  5. BUTCHER, R.W., F.T.K. PENTELOW and J.W.A. WOODLEY, 1930. An investigation of the river Lark and the effect of beet sugar pollution. Fishery Investigations Series I, Vol III, No. 3:1–100.Google Scholar
  6. CASTENHOLZ, R.W., 1961. An evaluation of a submerged glass method of estimating production of attached algae. Verh. Internat. Ver. Limnol., 14:155–159.Google Scholar
  7. DUMONT, H.J., 1969. A quantitative method for the study of periphyton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 14:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GERLACH, D., 1969. Botanische Microtechnik. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  9. HERDER-BROUWER, S.J., 1975. The development of periphyton on artificial substrates. Hydrobiol. Bull., 9:81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HILLEBRAND, H., 1973. Ecological investigation of filamentous freshwater algae. Hydrobiol. Bull., 7:25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HILLEBRAND, H., 1977. Periodicity and distribution of multicellular green algae in two lake areas in the Netherlands. Ph.D.Thesis, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. HILLEBRAND, H. and S.P. KLAPWIJK, 1976. Distribution of multicellular benthic algae in an eutrophic ditch. Hydrobiol. Bull., 10:48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. JONGE, H. de, 1963. Inleiding tot de medische statistiek, 2d ed. Verh. Ned. Inst. Praev. Geneeskunde, XLI, Leiden.Google Scholar
  14. KLAPWIJK, S.P., 1975. Literatuuroverzicht betreffende effecten van verontreinigingen op benthische wieren. Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, VU, werknota 57 (unpublished report; in Dutch).Google Scholar
  15. KLAPWIJK, S.P., 1976. Effecten van verschillende verontreinigingstypen op de benthische wierflora in polderwater van het Groene Hart van Holland. Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, VU, werknota 58 (unpublished report; in Dutch).Google Scholar
  16. KLAPWIJK, S.P., 1978. Saprobiological evaluation of dutch ditches using benthic algae on artificial substrates. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 20:1811–1815.Google Scholar
  17. KOOIJMAN, S., 1978. Gradiëntenbeschrijving in de oecologie. Contactblad voor Oecologen, 14:77–81 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  18. KREBS, C.J., 1972. Ecology. The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  19. NETHERLANDS CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS, 1972, Water pollution by biodegradable organic and eutrophicating materials. Staatsuitgeverij, The Hague (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  20. ODUM, E.P., 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. PANTLE, R., and H. BUCK, 1955. Die biologische Uberwachung der Gewässer und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse. Gas und Wasserfach, 96:604.Google Scholar
  22. PATRICK, R., M.H. HOHN and J. WALLACE, 1954. A new method for determining the pattern of the diatom flora. Notulae Naturae, 259:1–12.Google Scholar
  23. PENTELOW, F.T.K., R.W. BUTCHER and J. GRINDLEY, 1938. An investigation of the effects of milk wastes on the Bristol Avon. Fishery Investigations, Series I, Vol IV, No. 1:1–76.Google Scholar
  24. SLÁDEČEK, V., 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Ergebn. Limnol., 7:1–218.Google Scholar
  25. SLÁDECKOVA, A., 1962. Limnological investigation methods for the periphyton (Aufwuchs) community. Bot. Rev., 28:286–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. TIPPETT, R., 1970. Artificial substrates as a method of studying populations of benthic micro-algae in fresh water. Br. Phyc. J., 5:187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Netherlands Hydrobiological Society 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. P. Klapwijk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental StudiesFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations