Abstract
This piece responds to Meacham's (1994) suggestion that prejudice may be replaced by tolerance through the simple understanding of two forms of individualism that may be expressed by members of society—that is, that if we move from a self-contained to an ensembled individualism, we will treat those different from ourselves in a more tolerant fashion. This model is criticized for its emphasis on tolerance of, rather than respect for, all groups in society and, furthermore, for its bias toward groups that are more highly valued by the current society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chodorow, N. (1971). Being and doing. In M. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.),Women, culture, and society (pp. 43–66). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In Another Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Kunjufu, M. (1994).Black Economics. Chicago: African Images.
May, P. (1986). Alcohol and drug misuse prevention programs for American Indians: Needs and opportunities.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 187–195.
Meacham, J. A. (1994). Identity, community, and prejudice.Journal of Adult Development, 1 (this issue)
Myers, L. (1993).Understanding an Afrocentric world view: Introduction to an optimal psychology. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning.American Psychologist, 43, 15–22.
Takaki, R. (1994).From different shores: Perspectives on race and ethnicity in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations. (1991).Women: Challenges to the year 2000. New York: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wells, Y.V. The myth of a new tolerance for old differences: A rebuttal to meacham. J Adult Dev 1, 181–184 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260093
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260093