Skip to main content
Log in

Identity, community, and prejudice

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new and urgent developmental task of adulthood is to learn to live with those who differ from oneself along dimensions of race, gender, ethnicity, religion, social class, and nationality. In order to promote discussion aimed toward achieving a better understanding of issues of multiculturalism and diversity, a conceptual framework is proposed. The conceptual framework is based on distinctions in how we define ourselves and our relationship to others and on contrasting perspectives on our intentions with respect to others. The conceptual framework is then used as a tool for setting forth a number of issues of multiculturalism and diversity. The article concludes with a discussion of the dynamics within the conceptual framework, including intraindividual and interindividual variation in adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, E. (1968).Desert solitaire: A season in the wilderness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, H. (1983, August 3). “Bias incident” at Staten Island's Miller Field: A tale of two neighborhoods.The New York Times. Also printed in P.S. Rothenberg (Ed.). (1988).Racism and sexism: An integrated study (pp. 31–35). New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, T. F. (1987).The myth of Christian uniqueness. New York: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldberg, M. (1980).The turbulent era: Riot and disorder in Jacksonian America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1982). A reply to my critics. In J. B. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.),Habermas: Critical debates (pp. 219–283). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984).The theory of communicative action. Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R., & Marecek, J. (1990). Gender and meaning of difference: Postmodernism and psychology. In R. Hare-Mustin & J. Maracek (Eds.),Making a difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harre, R. (1984).Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, W. (1992, November 4). Multiculturalism may prove to be the key issue of our epoch.Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B3, B5.

  • Kessler-Harris, A. (1992, October 21). Multiculturalism can strengthen, not undermine, a common culture.Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B3, B7.

  • Leiss, W. (1972).The domination of nature. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949).A Sand County almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. (1981).The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, B. (1989).The end of nature. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A. (1984). The social basis of intentional action.Human Development, 27, 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A. (1989). Discovering the social-cultural context of research: Listening to and learning from research participants. In D. A. Kramer & M. J. Bopp (Eds.),Transformation in clinical and developmental psychology (pp. 136–153). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A. (1991a). Conflict and cooperation in adulthood: A role for both? In J. D. Sinnott & J. C. Cavanaugh (Eds.),Bridging paradigms: Positive development in adulthood and cognitive aging (pp. 87–98). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A. (1991b). The concept of nature: Implications for assessment of competence. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (Eds.),Criteria for competence: Controversies in the conceptualization and assessment of children's abilities (pp. 43–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A., & Boyd, C. (1994). Expanding the circle of caring: From local to global. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.),Interdisciplinary handbook of adult lifespan learning (pp. 61–73). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A., & Emont, N. C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.),Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7–23). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. F. (1989).The rights of nature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H., III. (1989).Philosophy gone wild. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning.American Psychologist, 43, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. D. (1986).Sex roles and aging: Theory and research from a systems perspective. New York: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meacham, J.A. Identity, community, and prejudice. J Adult Dev 1, 169–180 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260092

Key words

Navigation