Skip to main content
Log in

Limits of morality: A sociological approach to higher moral stages

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grounded in the wider framework of Kohlberg's (1984) stage theory of moral development and Habermas' (1981; Habermas & Luhmann, 1971) theory of discourse, this article addresses the question: Is a moral stage 6 society possible? Toward answering this question, a sociological approach to moral stage 6 is employed that complements the usual psychological approach to moral development. The article posits that a moral stage 6 society is impossible. Therefore, lower-stage institutions cannot be abolished; they have to be controlled and supervised. This calls for a new and structurally different type of discourse, the metadiscourse. The article postulates that such metadiscourse has the property of moral stage 7 according to the general stage model (Commons & Richards, 1984a, 1984b). Finally, several strategies for controlling lower-stage institutions are considered, with bureaucracy serving as example of a lower-stage institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1987).Personality and organization: The conflict between system and the individual. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967).The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, M. L., & Richards, F. A. (1984a). A general model of stage theory. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.),Beyond formal operations: Vol. 1. Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp.120–140). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, M. L., & Richards, F. A. (1984b). Applying the general stage model. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.),Beyond formal operations: Vol. 1. Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 141–157). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. P. (1981). The comparative study of the development of moral judgment and reasoning. In R. H. Munroe, R. H. Munroe, & B. B. Whiting (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 501–528). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, A. (1988).Man, his nature and place in the world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1968).Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie.” Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973).Kultur und Kritik. Verstreute Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1976).Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981).Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns (2 Vols.) Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Luhmann, N. (1971).Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie—Was leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, A. (1987). Moralische Erziehung in der Gerechte Gemeinschaft-Schule. Üeber schulpraktische Erfahrungen in den USA. In G. Lind & J. Raschert (Eds.),Moralische Urteilsfähigkeit: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Lawrence Kohlberg über Moral. Erziehung und Demokratie (pp. 54–72). Weinheim and Basel: Beltz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1961). The processes of social influence.Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1969). Patterns of personal involvement in the national system. A social-psychological analysis of political legitimacy. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.),International politics and foreign policy (2nd ed.) (pp. 276–288). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984).Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: Moral stages, their nature and validity. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1970).Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie Sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1975a).Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1975b).Legitimation durch Verfahren. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (1975).Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1986).Complex organizations. A critical essay. (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, C. (1988). The just community approach to moral education.Journal of Moral Education, 17(3), 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., & Morelli, G. (1989). Perspectives on children's development from cultural psychology.American Psychologist, 44(2), 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnert, G., & Commons, M. L. (July, 1991).Society and the highest stages of moral development. Paper presented at the 6th Adult Development Symposium, Boston, MA.

  • Weber, M. (1968).Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonnert, G. Limits of morality: A sociological approach to higher moral stages. J Adult Dev 1, 127–134 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259678

Key words

Navigation