Advertisement

Genetica

, Volume 99, Issue 2–3, pp 77–88 | Cite as

The social and economic origins of genetic determinism: a case history of the American Eugenics Movement, 1900–1940 and its lessons for today

  • Garland E. Allen
Article

Abstract

Eugenics, the attempt to improve the genetic quality of the human species by ‘better breeding’, developed as a worldwide movement between 1900 and 1940. It was particularly prominent in the United States, Britain and Germany, and in those countries was based on the then-new science of Mendelian genetics. Eugenicists developed research programs to determine the degree to which traits such as Huntington's chorea, blindness, deafness, mental retardation (feeblemindedness), intelligence, alcoholism, szhiophrenia, manic depression, rebelliousness, nomadism, prostitution and feeble-inhibition were genetically determined. Eugenicists were also active in the political arena, lobbying in the United States for immigration restriction and compulsory sterilization laws for those deemed genetically unfit; in Britain they lobbied for incarceration of genetically unfit and in Germany for sterilization and eventually euthanasia. In all these countries one of the major arguments was that of efficiency: that it was inefficient to allow genetic defects to be multiplied and then have to try and deal with the consequences of state care for the offspring. National Socialists called genetically defective individuals ‘useless eaters’ and argued for sterilization or euthanasia on economic grounds. Similar arguments appeared in the United States and Britain as well. At the present time (1997) much research and publicity is being given to claims about a genetic basis for all the same behaviors (alcoholism, manic depression, etc), again in an economic context — care for people with such diseases is costing too much. There is an important lesson to learn from the past: genetic arguments are put forward to mask the true — social and economic — causes of human behavioral defects.

Key words

eugenics genetic determinism immigration restriction Nazi science sterilization laws 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, G., 1966. The Age of Industrial Violence. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Allen G.E., 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, G.E., 1986. The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor: An Essay in Institutional History. Osiris, New Series 5: 225–264.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, G.E., 1987. The role of experts in scientific controversy, in Scientific controversies; Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science, edited by H.T. Engelhardt and A.L. Caplan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, G.E., 1997 in press. Modern biological determinism: The Violence Initiative, the Human Genome project, and the new eugenics, in Sociology of Sciences Yearbook: The Practices of Human Genetics 19, Volume 4 edited by E. Mendelsohn and M. Fortun.Google Scholar
  6. Barkan, E., 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism. Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Burleigh, M., 1994. Death and Deliverance. ‘Euthanasia’ in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Chase, A., 1977. The Legacy of Malthus. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Davenport, C.B., 1910. Eugenics. The Science of Human Improvement By Better Breeding. Henry Holt, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Davenport, C.B., 1913. Heredity, culpability, praiseworthiness, punishment, and reward. Popular Science Monthly 82: 33–39.Google Scholar
  11. Davenport, C.B., 1915. The feebly-inhibited I. Violent temper and its inheritance. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 42(9): 593–628.Google Scholar
  12. Davenport, C.B., 1928. Crime, heredity and environment. Journal of Heredity 19(7): 307–313.Google Scholar
  13. Galton, F., 1883. Inquiry into Human Faculty and its Development. MacMillan & Co., London.Google Scholar
  14. Gould, S.J., 1996. The Mismeasure of Man, revised edition. W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Hassencahl, F.J., 1970. Harry H. Laughlin, Expert Eugenics Agent for the House Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, 1921–1931 (Doctoral dissertation, CASE Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32-01A, page 0576.Google Scholar
  16. Horgan, J., June 1993. Eugenics revisited. Scientific American 268: 122–131.Google Scholar
  17. Jennings, H.S., March 14, 1924. Proportions of defectives from the northwest and from the southeast of Europe. Science 59: 256–257.Google Scholar
  18. Kamin, L.J., 1974. The Science and Politics of I.Q. Lawrence Erlbaum, Potomac, Maryland.Google Scholar
  19. Kevles, D.J., 1986. In the Name of Eugenics. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Koshland, D., Oct 12, 1990. The rational approach to the irrational. Science 250: 189.Google Scholar
  21. Kühl, S., 1994. The Nazi Connection, Eugenics, American Racism and German National Sociality. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Laughlin, H.H., 1922. Eugenical Sterilization in the United States. The Pathological Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Laughlin, H.H., 1923. Analysis of America's Modern Melting Pot. Hearings Before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, House of Representatives, Sixty-Seventh Congress (November 21, 1922). Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Lens, S., 1973. The Labor Wars. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Lombardo, P.A., 1985. Three generations of imbeciles is enough: New light on ‘Buck vs Bell’. New York University Law Review 60: 30–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ludmerer, K., 1972. Genetics and American Society. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  27. Mehler, B., 1994. In genes we trust. When science bows to racism. Reform Judaism 23: 10–13; 77–79.Google Scholar
  28. Paul, J., 1974. State Eugenic Sterilization History: A Brief Overview, p. 31 in Eugenic Sterilization, edited by Jonas Robitscher. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  29. Pernick, M., 1996. The Black State: Eugenics and the Death of Defective Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures Since 1915. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Proctor, R., 1988. Racial Hygiene; Medicine under the Nazis Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Reilly, P.R., 1991. The Surgical Solution. A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United States. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  32. Weindling, P., 1989. Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Weiss, S.F., 1990. The race-hygiene movement in Germany, 1904–1945 in The Wellborn Science, pp. 8–68, edited by M.B. Adams. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wiebe, R., 1967. The Search for Order. Hill and Wang, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garland E. Allen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations