Auditory cortex neurons sensitive to correlates of auditory motion: underlying mechanisms
- 97 Downloads
Neuronal response properties such as phasic vs. tonic, onset vs. offset, monotonicity vs. non-monotonicity, and E/E vs. E/I, can be shown to act synergistically suggesting underlying mechanisms for selectivity to binaural intensity correlates of auditory sound source motion. Both identical (diotic), and oppositely directed dichotic AM ramps were used as stimuli in the lightly anesthetized cat, simulating motion in four canonical directions in 3-dimensional space. Motion in either azimuthal direction evokes selective activity in cells which respond best to the onset of monaural sound in one ear and show a decreased response to binaural stimulation (E/I or I/E). In some cells specificity is increased by “off” components in the non-dominant ear. Although these cells fire only at the onset of stationary sound, they fire throughout oppositely directed AM ramps. Motion toward or away from the head evokes responses from EE cells; strong binaural facilitation increases selectivity for motion in depth. The sharpness of direction of tuning was related to the degree of binaural facilitation in E/E cells. Selectivity for sound moving away from the head is correlated with “off” responses, while “on” responses correlate with preference for motion toward the head. Most units showed a monotonic rate function as AM ramp excursion and rate was increased. One third were selective for slower rates of intensity change and may therefore encode slower rates of stimulus motion, as well as direction of movement. The findings suggest that neural processing of auditory motion involves neural mechanisms distinct from those involved in processing stationary sound location and that these mechanisms arise from interactions between the more traditionally studied response properties of auditory cortex neurons.
Key wordsAuditory cortex Motion Depth Binaural interaction Cat
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brugge JF, Imig TJ (1978) Some relationship binaural response patterns of single neurons to cortical columns and interhemispheric connections of auditory area AI of cat cerebral cortex. In: Naunton RF, Fernandez C (eds) Evoked electrical activity in the auditory nervous system. Academic Press, New York, pp 487–503Google Scholar
- Cynader M, Chernenko G (1976) Abolition of directional selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat. Science 193:504–505Google Scholar
- Evans E (1968) Cortical representation. In: DeReuck AVS, Knight J (eds) CIBA Symposium, hearing mechanism in vertebrates. Churchill, London, pp 272–287Google Scholar
- Hafter ER, Buell TN, Richards VM (1988) Onset-coding in lateralization: its form, site and function. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM (eds) Auditory function. Wiley, New York, pp 647–676Google Scholar
- Mendelson JR, Cynader MS (1983) Frequency disparity selectivity in cat primary auditory cortex (AI). Soc Neurosci Abstr V9:955Google Scholar
- Moore DR, Hutchings ME, Addison PD, Semple MN, Aitkin LM (1984) Properties of spatial receptive field in the central nucleus of the cat inferior colliculus. II. Stimulus intensity effects Hear Res 13:175–188Google Scholar
- Phillips DP, Brugge JF (1985) Progress in neurophysiology of sound localization. Ann Rev Psychol 36:245–274Google Scholar
- Regan D, Beverley KI, Cynader M (1979) Stereoscopic subsystem for position in depth and for motion in depth. Proc R Soc B (London) 204:485–501Google Scholar
- Richards W, Regan D (1973) A stereo field map with implications for disparity processing. Investig Ophthamol 12:904–909Google Scholar
- Semple MN, Aitkin LM, Calford MB, Pettigrew JD, Phillips D (1983) Spatial receptive fields in the cat inferior colliculus Hear Res 10:203–215Google Scholar
- Yost WA, Hafter ER (1987) Lateralization. In: Yost WA, Gourewitch G (eds) Directional hearing. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–84Google Scholar