Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 411–421 | Cite as

Biomechanical organization of single motor units in two multi-tendoned muscles of the cat distal forelimb

  • N. Fritz
  • C. Schmidt
  • T. Yamaguchi
Regular Papers


In anesthetized cats single motor units (MUs) of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscles were selectively activated by stimulation of cervical ventral root filaments. The distribution of force developed by single MUs at the four distal tendons of the EDC muscle and at three portions of the distal tendon of the ECU muscle was analysed. In general, single MUs of both muscles distributed force over all tendons in a unimodal pattern, with the maximal force levels generated at one specific tendon which was termed the best-tendon. Distributions of force were quantitatively described by a parameter representing the mean direction of force output (output-index) and a further one representing the dispersion of force over the distal tendons (divergence). Generally, these parameters and the best-tendon remained stable when a MU was stimulated at different frequencies, but varied from MU to MU. Despite the general stability of the force distribution, slight systematic changes were regularly found in EDC MUs, when they developed a higher amount of force due to a higher frequency of stimulation: the relative amount of force at the best-tendon increased; e.g. the MUs got more selective for the best-tendon. These changes were partly due to overcoming mechanical cross-coupling between neighbouring compartments of the EDC muscle. Such changes of force distribution were only found in a part of the ECU MUs; other ECU MUs did not change their force distribution at all or became less selective for the best-tendon. The phenomenon that MUs of multi-tendoned muscles distribute their force output to the distal tendons in specific patterns is probably due to mechanical partitioning of the parent muscles: the localization of spatial territories of MUs within different anatomical muscle compartments should correspond to the best-tendon. Complex mechanisms allowing passive transmission of force from limited territories along the transverse axis of both muscles must be assumed in order to explain why most MUs act on all tendons and why force distributions change with increasing stimulus frequency. In addition, specific relations between unit type and force distributions were found within both muscles. Fatigue-resistant EDC MUs have broader force distributions than fatigue-sensitive EDC MUs and slow ECU MUs were found to act predominantly on the most ulnar part of the distal tendon. These biomechanical properties of MUs are discussed as supporting the specific functions of the respective muscles.

Key words

Motor unit Multi-tendoned muscle Mechanical partitioning Mechanical cross-coupling Cat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balice-Gordon RJ, Thompson WJ (1988) The organization and development of compartmentalized innervation in rat extensor digitorum longus muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 398:211–231Google Scholar
  2. Borg TK, Caulfield JB (1980) Morphology of connective tissue of skeletal muscle. Tissue Cell 12:197–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Botterman BR, Hamm TM, Reinking RM, Stuart DG (1983) Localization of monosynaptic Ia excitatory post-synaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat biceps femoris muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 338:355–377Google Scholar
  4. Botterman BR, Iwamoto GA, Gonyea WJ (1985) Classification of motor units in flexor carpi radialis muscle of the cat. J Neurophysiol 54:676–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke RE (1981) Motor units: anatomy, physiology and functional organization. In: Handbook of physiology. The nervous system: motor control, vol 1, part 2, ed Brooks, VB. Williams and Wilkins, Bethesda pp 345–422Google Scholar
  6. Burke RE, Tsairis P (1973) Anatomy and innervation ratios in motor units of cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol (Lond) 234:749–765Google Scholar
  7. English AW (1984) An electromyographic analysis of compartments in cat lateral gastrocnemius muscle during unrestrained locomotion. J Neurophysiol 52:114–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fritz N, Schmidt Ch (1988) Direction and dispersion of force developed by single motorunits in two muscles of the cat distal forelimb. (Abstreat at the 11th Annual Meeting of the European Neuroscience Association) Eur J Neurosci [Suppl] 1:148Google Scholar
  9. Fritz N, Schmidt Ch (1991) Contractile properties of single motor units in two multi-tendoned muscles of the cat distal forelimb. Exp Brain Res 88:401–410Google Scholar
  10. Fritz N, Yamaguchi T (1985) Relationship between Ia-input and force-output in single motor-units of the cat extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle. Neurosci Lett [Suppl] 22:S593Google Scholar
  11. Fritz N, Yamaguchi T (1986) Force-output profiles in single motorunits of the cat extensor digitorum communis muscle. Pflügers Arch 406:R9Google Scholar
  12. Fritz N, Illert M, Wiedemann E (1985) EMG studies in the distal forelimb of the cat during locomotion and food taking movements. Acta Physiol Scand 123:55AGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritz N, Illert M, Reeh P (1986a) Location of motoneurones projecting to the cat distal forelimb. II. Median and ulnar motornuclei. J Comp Neurol 244:302–312Google Scholar
  14. Fritz N, Illert M, Saggau, P (1986b) Location of motoneurones projecting to the cat distal forelimb. I. Deep radial motornuclei. J Comp Neurol 244:286–301Google Scholar
  15. Fritz N, Illert M, de la Motte S, Reeh P, Saggau P (1989) Pattern of monosynaptic Ia connections in the cat forelimb. J Physiol (Lond) 419:321–351Google Scholar
  16. Hoffer JA, Loeb GE, Sugano N, Marks WB, O'Donovan MJ, Pratt CA (1987) Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. III. Functional segregation in sartorius. J Neurophysiol 57:554–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffman P, Illert M, Wiedemann E (1986) EMG Pattern of cat forelimb muscles during target reaching and food taking movements. Neurosci Lett [Suppl] 22:S126Google Scholar
  18. Koehler W, Windhorst U (1980) Multi-loop representation of the segmental muscle stretch reflex: its risk of instability. Biol Cybern 38:51–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Koehler W, Windhorst U (1981) Frequency response characteristics of a multi-loop representation of the segmental muscle stretch reflex. Biol Cybern 40:59–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Loeb GE, Pratt CA, Chanaud CM, Richmond FJR (1987) Distribution and innervation of short, interdigitating muscle fibers in parallel-fibered muscles of the cat hindlimb. J Morphol 191:1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rack PHM, Westbury DR (1984) Elastic properties of the cat soleus tendon and their functional importance. J Physiol (Lond) 347:479–495Google Scholar
  22. Rowe RWD (1981) Morphology of perimysial and endomysial connective tissue in skeletal muscle. Tissue Cell 13:681–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stuart DG, Hamm TM, Vanden Noven S (1988) Partitioning of monosynaptic Ia EPSP connections with motoneurons according to neuromuscular topography: generality and functional implications. Progr Neurobiol 30:437–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Weeks OI, English AW (1985) Compartimentalization of the cat lateral gastrocnemius motor nucleus. J Comp Neurol 235:255–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Weeks OI, English AW (1987) Cat triceps surae motor nuclei are organized topologically. Exp Neurol 96:163–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Windhorst U, Hamm TM, Stuart DG (1989) On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning. Behav Brain Sci 12:629–681Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Fritz
    • 1
  • C. Schmidt
    • 1
  • T. Yamaguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches Institut der Universität MünchenMünchen 2Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations