Skip to main content

The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns

Summary

We studied the response of single units to moving random dot patterns in areas V1 and MT of the alert macaque monkey. Most cells could be driven by such patterns; however, many cells in V1 did not give a consistent response but fired at a particular point during stimulus presentation. Thus different dot patterns can produce a markedly different response at any particular time, though the time averaged response is similar. A comparison of the directionality of cells in both V1 and MT using random dot patterns shows the cells of MT to be far more directional. In addition our estimates of the percentage of directional cells in both areas are consistent with previous reports using other stimuli. However, we failed to find a bimodality of directionality in V1 which has been reported in some other studies. The variance associated with response was determined for individual cells. In both areas the variance was found to be approximately equal to the mean response, indicating little difference between extrastriate and striate cortex. These estimates are in broad agreement (though the variance appears a little lower) with those of V1 cells of the anesthetized cat. The response of MT cells was simulated on a computer from the estimates derived from the single unit recordings. While the direction tuning of MT cells is quite wide (mean half-width at half-height approximately 50°) it is shown that the cells can reliably discriminate much smaller changes in direction, and the performance of the cells with the smallest discriminanda were comparable to thresholds measured with human subjects using the same stimuli (approximately 1.1°). Minimum discriminanda for individual cells occurred not at the preferred direction, that is, the peak of their tuning curves, but rather on the steep flanks of their tuning curves. This result suggests that the cells which may mediate the discrimination of motion direction may not be the cells most sensitive to that direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2:284–299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albright TD (1984) Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 52:1106–1130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albus K (1980) The detection of movement direction and effects of contrast reversal in the cat's striate cortex. Vision Res 20:289–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker CL, Braddick OJ (1982) The basis of area and dot number effects in random dot motion perception. Vision Res 22:1253–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ball K, Sekuler R, Machamer J (1979) Detection and identification of moving targets. Vision Res 23:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci 12:297–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley A, Skottun BC, Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman RD (1987) Visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single neurons and behavior. J Neurophysiol 57:755–772

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Bruyn B, Orban GA (1988) Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns. Vision Res 28:1323–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Valois RL, Yund EW, Hepler NK (1982a) The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:531–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, Thorell LG (1982b) Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:545–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dean AF (1981) The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 44:437–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dow BM, Snyder AZ, Vautin RG, Bauer R (1981) Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 44:214–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Downing C, Movshon JA (1989) Spatial and temporal summation in the detection of motion in stochastic random dot displays. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci (Suppl) 30:72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gattass R, Gross CG (1981) Visual topography of striate projection zone (MT) in posterior temporal sulcus of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 46:621–638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert CD (1977) Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol (London) 268:391–421

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gulyás B, Orban GA, Duysens J, Maes H (1987) The suppressive influence of moving textured backgrounds on responses of cat striate neurons to moving bars. J Neurophysiol 57:1767–1791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammond P, MacKay DM (1975) Differential responses of cat visual cortical cells to textured stimuli. Exp Brain Res 22:427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammond P, MacKay DM (1977) Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture. Exp Brain Res 30:275–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammond P, Pomfrett CJD (1989) Visual texture: a tool for distinguishing simple from complex neurons in the cat's striate cortex and for elucidating cortical processing Ophthal Physiol Opt 9:345

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hawken MJ, Parker AJ, Lund JS (1988) Laminar organization and contrast sensitivity of direction-selective cells in the striate cortex of the Old World monkey. J Neurosci 8:3541–3548

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heggelund P, Albus K (1978) response variability and orientation discrimination of single cells in striate cortex of cat. Exp Brain Res 32:197–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holub RA, Morton-Gibson M (1981) Response of visual cortical neurons of the cat to moving sinusoidal gratings: response-contrast functions and spatiotemporal interactions. J Neurophysiol 46:1244–1259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Livingstone M, Hubel DH (1981) Effects of sleep and arousal on the processing of visual information in the cat. Nature (London) 291:554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mikami A, Newsome WT, Wurtz RH (1986) Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. I. Mechanisms of direction and speed selectivity in extrastriate area MT. J Neurophysiol 55:1308–1327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Motter BC, Poggio GF (1984) Binocular fixation in the rhesus monkey: spatial and temporal characteristics. Exp Brain Res 54:304–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakayama K, Tyler CW (1981) Psychophsical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues. Vision Res 21:427–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Newsome WT, Britten KH, Movshon JA (1989) Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature (London) 341:52–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Newsome WT, Paré EB (1988) A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci 8:2201–2211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parker A, Hawken M (1985) Capabilities of monkey cortical cells in spatial-resolution tasks. J Opt Soc Am 2:1101–1114

    Google Scholar 

  30. Regan D, Beverley KI (1983) Spatial frequency discrimination and detection and comparison of post-adaptation threshold. J Opt Soc Am 1684–1690

  31. Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Transact Biomed Eng 10:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rose D (1979) An analysis of the variability of unit activity in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 37:595–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Santen JPH, Sperling G (1985) Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am 2:300

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SE (1976) Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 39:1288–1319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scobey RP, Gabor AJ (1989) Orientation discrimination sensitivity of single units in cat primary visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 77:398–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Skottun BC, Grosof DH, De Valois RL (1988) Responses of simple and complex cells to random dot patterns: a quantitative comparison. J Neurophysiol 59:1719–1735

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Snodderly DM, Kurtz D (1985) Eye position during fixation tasks: comparison of macaque and human. Vision Res 25:83–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Snowden RJ, Erickson RG, Treue S, Andersen RA (1990) Transparent motion stimuli reveal divisive inhibition in area MT of macaque. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci (Suppl) 31:399

    Google Scholar 

  39. Snowden RJ, Treue S, Erickson RG, Andersen RA (1991) The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion. J Neurosci (in press)

  40. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Thompson ID (1981) The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast. Exp Brain Res 41:414–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Dean AF (1983) The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Res 23:775–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vogels R, Spileers W, Orban GA (1989) The response variability of striate cortical neurons in the behaving monkey. Exp Brain Res 77:432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Werner G, Mountcastle VB (1963) The variability of central neural activity in a sensory system, and its implications for the central reflection of sensory events. J Neurophysiol 26:958–977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeki SM (1974) Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey. J Physiol (London) 236:549–573

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zohary E, Hillman P, Hochstein S (1990) Time course of perceptual discrimination and single neuron reliability. Biol Cybern 62:475–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Andersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snowden, R.J., Treue, S. & Andersen, R.A. The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns. Exp Brain Res 88, 389–400 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259114

Download citation

Key words

  • Motion perception
  • V1
  • MT
  • Random dot patterns
  • Response variance
  • Direction discrimination
  • Alert monkey