Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 37, Issue 12, pp 1296–1299 | Cite as

Vaginal endosonography

New approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter
  • A. H. Sultan
  • P. B. Loder
  • C. I. Bartram
  • M. A. Kamm
  • C. N. Hudson
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although anal endosonography provides clear images of anal sphincters, the probe in the anal canal may distort epithelial structures and sphincter muscles may be compressed, producing inaccurate muscle thickness measurements. The aim of this study is to describe a new approach using vaginal endosonography to image the anal canal undistorted. METHODS: Twenty females (10 healthy volunteers and 10 with fecal incontinence) had both anal and vaginal endosonography performed. RESULTS: The undisturbed anorectum, submucosa, anal cushions, and anal sphincter muscles were clearly visualized by vaginal endosonography, and anatomy was described. Although anal and vaginal endosonographic measurements of internal sphincter muscle thickness correlated (r=0.83;P=0.01), anal endosonography consistently underestimated the thickness (2.3±0.5 vs. 3.2±1.2 mm; mean ± standard deviation). Anterior internal and external anal sphincter defects were identified accurately with both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal endosonography is a new technique that enables accurate imaging of anal sphincters and epithelial structures at rest. In addition to making the diagnosis of anal sphincter defects, it has potential applications in the imaging of anovaginal sepsis and malignancy and possibly in understanding the pathogenesis of anal fissure and hemorrhoids.

Key words

Anal endosonography Anal sphincters Pelvic floor musculature vaginal endosonography Pelvic anatomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Law PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:349–53.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation within vitro andin vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:508–11.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen SG. Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:59–63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hauge C, Rasmussen O, Christiansen J. Endosonography of the anal sphincter: findings in healthy volunteers. Am J Radiol 1991;157:1199–202.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: precision of identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 1994;81:463–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum (in press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW. Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:689–92.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frentzel-Beyme B, Schwartz J, Aurich B. Die transrektale prostatasonographie (TPS). CT-Sonographie 1982;2:68–75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beynon J, Foy DM, Roe AM, Temple LN, McMortensen NJ. Endoluminal ultrasound in the assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1986;73:474–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Effect of hormonal changes in pregnancy on anal sphincter function. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993;8:206–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905–11.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery: a comparison between forceps and vacuum extraction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;43:263–70.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308:887–91.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stelzner F. Die Anorektalen fisteln. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981:1–30.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aronson MP, Lee RA, Berquist TH. Anatomy of anal sphincters and related structures in continent women studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:846–51.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA. Ultrasound of the anal sphincter. In: Schuster MM, ed. Atlas of gastrointestinal motility in health and disease. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:115–121.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 1994;49:368–74.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiller RI. The anal sphincter and the pathogenesis of anal fissure and fistula. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1931;L11:921–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. Sultan
    • 1
    • 3
  • P. B. Loder
    • 2
    • 3
  • C. I. Bartram
    • 4
  • M. A. Kamm
    • 3
  • C. N. Hudson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologySt. Bartholomew's (Homerton) HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologySt. Mark's HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of SurgerySt. Mark's HospitalLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of RadiologySt. Mark's HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations