Skip to main content
Log in

Chironomids and regional water types

  • Functional Ecology and Interactions
  • Published:
Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution pattern of 115 chironomid taxa at 664 sites, distributed over all kinds of water, was analyzed and related to 42 water types, based on the complete macrofauna composition. The distinction of chironomid groups was not useful to recognize water types. The use of individual chironomid taxa was more sensitive, though also too limited to recognize water types clearly. Chironomids are distributed along a continuum which is directed by master factors and detailed by habitat factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAGAARD, K., 1986. The chironomid fauna of Norwegian lakes, with a discussion on methods of community classification. Holarct. Ecol., 9: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNDIN, L., 1958. The bottom faunistical lake type and its application to the southern hemisphere. Moreover a theory of glacial erosion as a factor of productivity in lakes and oceans. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol., 13: 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • HILL, M.O., 1979. TWINSPAN-A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecol. Syst., Cornell Univ., New York. 90 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, R.K. and T. WIEDERHOLM, 1989. Classification and ordination of profundal macroinvertebrate communities in nutrient poor, oligomesohumic lakes in relation to environmental data. Freshwat. Biol., 21: 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • MINSHALL, G.W., K.W. CUMMINS, R.C. PETERSEN, C.E. CUSHING, D.A. BRUNS, J.R. SEDELL and R.L. VANNOTE, 1985. Development in stream ecosystem theory. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42:1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMEROD, S.J., 1987. The influences of habitat and seasonal sampling regimes on the ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the catchment of the river Wye, Wales. Hydrobiologia, 150: 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEET, R.K. 1980. Ordination as a tool for analyzing complex data sets. Vegetatio, 42: 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRESTON, F.W., 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology, 43: 185–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAE, J.G., 1985. A multivariate study of resource partitioning in soft bottom lotic Chironomidae. Hydrobiologia, 126: 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • TER BRAAK, C.J.F., 1987. CANOCO-A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] corre spondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN TONGEREN, O., 1986. FLEXCLUS, an interactive flexible cluster program. Acta Bot. Neerl., 35: 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERDONSCHOT, P.F.M., 1990. Ecological characterization of surface waters in the province of Overijssel (The Netherlands). Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen. 255 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, J.F., D. MOSS P.D. ARMITAGE and M. T. FURSE, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great-Brittain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol., 14: 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verdonschot, Piet, F.M., Real, M. et al. Chironomids and regional water types. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 26, 513–520 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02255284

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02255284

Keywords

Navigation