Advertisement

Hydrobiological Bulletin

, Volume 8, Issue 1–2, pp 124–138 | Cite as

Aspects of the ecology of the lamellibranchMercenaria mercenaria (L.) in British waters

  • Roger Mitchell
Physiology

Keywords

British Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANSELL, A.D., 1963.Venus mercenaria (L.) in Southampton Water, Ecology, 44: 396–397.Google Scholar
  2. ANSELL, A.D. & F.A. LOOSMORE, 1963. Preliminary observations on the reationship between growth, spawning and condition in experimental colonies ofVenus mercenaria L J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer., 28: 285–294.Google Scholar
  3. ANSELL, A.D., K.F. LANDER, J. COUGHLAN & F.A. LOOSMORE, 1964a. Studies on the hard-shell clam,Venus mercenaria, in British waters. I. Growth and reproduction in natural and experimental colonies. J. appl. Ecol., 1: 63–82.Google Scholar
  4. ANSELL, A.D., F.A. LOOSMORE & K.F. LANDER, 1964b. Studies on the hardshell clam,Venus mercenaria, in British waters. II. Seasonal cycle in condition and biochemical composition. J. appl. Ecol., 1: 83–95.Google Scholar
  5. ANSELL, A.D. & K.F. LANDER, 1967. Studies on the hard-shell clam,Venus mercenaria, in British waters. III. Further observations on the seasonal biochemical cycle and on spawning. J. appl. Ecol., 4: 425–435.Google Scholar
  6. ANSELL, A.D. & E.R. TRUEMAN, 1967. Burrowing inMercenaria mercenaria (L.) (Bivalvia, Veneridae). J. exp. Biol., 46: 105–115.Google Scholar
  7. ANSELL, A.D., 1968. The rate of growth of the hard clamMercenaria mercenaria (L.) throughout the geographical range. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer., 31: 364–409.Google Scholar
  8. CARRIKER, M.R., 1961. Interrelation of functional morphology, behaviour, and autecology in early stages of the bivalveMercenaria mercenaria. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 77: 168–241.Google Scholar
  9. DAVIS, H. C., 1958. Survival and growth of clam and oyster larvae at different salinities. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 114: 296–307.Google Scholar
  10. DAVIS, H.C. & A. CALABRESE, 1964. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on development of egg and larvae ofM.mercenaria andC. virginica. Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., 63: 643–655.Google Scholar
  11. DE MESQUITA, A.R., 1972. Studies on the mean flow of the western Solent. University of Southampton. M. Phil. Thesis.Google Scholar
  12. DYER, K.R., 1973. Estuaries: A physical introduction. Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  13. HASKIN H.H., 1954. Age determination in molluscs. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Ser. 2, 16: 300–304.Google Scholar
  14. HEPPELL, D., 1961. The naturalization in Europe of the quahog,Mercenaria mercenaria (L.). J. Conch., 25: 21–34.Google Scholar
  15. HOPKINS, H. S., 1941 Growth rings as an index of age inVenus mercenaria. Anat. Rec., 81: 53–54.Google Scholar
  16. KRUMBEIN, W.C. & L.L. SLOSS, 1963. Stratigraphy and sedimentation. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco and London.Google Scholar
  17. LANDERS, W.S., 1954. Seasonal abundance of clam larvae in Rhode Island waters 1950–52. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv. Spec. Sci. Rept.-Fish No. 117.Google Scholar
  18. LOOSANOFF, V.L. & H.C. DAVIS, 1950. ConditioningVenus mercenaria for spawning in winter and breeding its larvae in the laboratory. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 98: 60–65.Google Scholar
  19. LOOSANOFF V.L., W.S. MILLER & P.B. SMITH, 1951. Growth and setting of larvae ofVenus mercenaria in relation to temperature. J. mar. Res., 10: 59–81.Google Scholar
  20. LOOSANOFF, V.L. & H.C. DAVIS, 1951. Delayed spawning of lamellibranchs by low temperature. J. mar. Res., 10: 197–202.Google Scholar
  21. LOOSANOFF, V.L. & H.C. DAVIS, 1963. Rearing of bivalve mollusks. In F.S. Russel ed. Advances in Marine Biology, 1: 1–136. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  22. McINTYRE, A.D., 1970. The range of biomass in intertidal sand, with special reference to the bivalveTellina tenuis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., 50: 561–575.Google Scholar
  23. MITCHELL, R., 1974. Studies on the population dynamics and some aspects of the biology ofMercenaria mercenaria (Linne). University of Southampton. Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
  24. NEWELL, G.E., 1964. The south-east coast, Withstable area. In: D.J. Crisp ed. The effects of the severe winter of 1962–63 on marine life in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol., 33: 178–179.Google Scholar
  25. PHILLIPSON, J., 1964. A miniature bomb calorimeter for small biological samples. Oikos, 15: 1.Google Scholar
  26. RAYMONT, J.E.G. & B.G.A. CARRIE, 1964. The production of zooplankton in Southampton Water. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 2: 185–232.Google Scholar
  27. RUSSELL, F.S. & J.E. COLMAN, 1931. Great Barrier Reef Expedition, 1928–9: Scientific Report, 2 No. 2. The zooplankton. I. Gear, methods and station lists. British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
  28. WAUGH, G.D., 1964. The effect of the severe winter of 1962–63 on oysters and the associated fauna of oyster grounds of southern England. In: D.J. Crisp ed. The effects of the severe winter, of 1962–63 on marine life in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol., 33: 173–175.Google Scholar
  29. WICKSTEAD, J.H., 1965. An introduction to the study of tropical plankton. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Netherlands Hydrobiological Society 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Mitchell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OceanographyUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonEngland

Personalised recommendations