Abstract
A survey of North American plethysmographic assessment centers was undertaken to examine the extent to which variability exists among them. Results clearly revealed a field in which there is abundant inconsistency in both plethysmographic assessment procedures and data interpretation. A critical need for standardization was identified if plethysmographic assessment is to develop further its potential to assist in the clinical assessment and treatment of sex offenders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Guild, D. (1977). The components of rapists' sexual arousal.Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 895–903.
Adams, H. E., Motsinger, P., McAnulty, R. D., & Moore, A. L. (1992). Voluntary control of penile tumescence among homosexual and heterosexual subjects.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, (1), 17–31.
Bancroft, J. H., Jones, H. G., & Pullan, B. P., (1966). A simple transducer for measuring penile erection with comments on its use in the treatment of sexual disorders.Behavior Research and Therapy, 4, 239–241.
Barker, J. G., & Howell, R. J. (1992). The plethysmograph: A review of recent literature.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20(1), 13–27.
Earls, C. M. (1983). Some issues in the assessment of sexual deviance.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 6, 431–441.
Earls, C. M., & Proulx, J. (1986). The differentiation of Francophone rapists and nonrapists using penile circumferential measures.Crimial Justice and Behavior, 13(4), 419–429.
Earls, C. M., Quinsey, V. L., & Castonguay L. G. (1987). A comparison of three methods of scoring penile circumference changes.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16(6), 493–500.
Fisher, C., Gross, J., & Zuch, J. (1965). Cycle of penile erection synchronous with dreaming (REM) sleep.Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 23–45.
Freund, K. (1963). A laboratory method of diagnosing predominance of homo- or heteroerotic interest in the male.Behavior Research and Therapy, 12, 355–359.
Freund, K. (1991). Reflections on the development of the phallometric method of assessing sexual preferences.Annals of Sex Research, 4, 221–228.
Furr, K. D. (1991). Penis size and magnitude of erectile change as spurious factors in estimating sexual arousal.Annals of Sex Research, 4, 265–279.
Government of Canada (1993).Criminal code of Canada. Agincourt, Ontario: Carswell.
Hall, G. C. N. (1989). Sexual arousal and arousability in a sexual offender population.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98(2), 145–149.
Hall, G. C. N. (1990). Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population: A reply to Quinsey and Laws.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 889–891.
Hall, G. C. N., Proctor, W. C., & Nelson, G. M. (1988). The validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 118–122.
Langevin, R. (1989).Sexual preference testing. Toronto: Juniper Press.
Laws, D. R. (1993). The President's Column: Certification of plethysmograph operators.ATSA Newsletter, 5(2), 2–4.
Laws, D. R., & Holmen, M. L. (1978). Sexual response faking by pedophiles.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 343–356.
Laws, D. R., & Rubin, H. B. (1969). Instructional control of an autonomic nomic sexual response.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 2, 93–99.
McAnulty, R. D., & Adams, H. E. (1992). Validity and ethics of penile circumference measures of sexual arousal: A reply to McConaghy.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21(2), 177–186.
McConaghy, N. (1989). Validity and ethics of penile circumference measures of sexual arousal: A critical review.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18(4), 357–359.
McGrath, R. J. (1991). Sex-offender risk assessment and disposition planning: A review of empirical and clinical findings.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35(4), 328–350.
Murphy, W. D., Krisak, J., Stalgaitis, S., & Anderson, K. (1984). The use of penile tumescenc measures with incarcerated rapists: Further validity issues.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13(6), 545–554.
Mussack, S. (1992). A dialogue about the plethysmograph.ATSA Newsletter, 4, 3–6.
Pithers, W. D., & Laws, D. R. (1988). The penile plethysmograph: Uses and abuses in assessment and treatment of sexual aggressors. InSex offenders: Issues in treatment. National Institute of Corrections, Washington, DC.
Proulx, J. (1989). Sexual preference assessment of sexual aggressors.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 6, 431–441.
Quinsey, V. L., & Laws, D. R. (1990). Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population: A critique of Hall, Proctor, and Nelson.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 886–889.
Rosen, R. C., & Keefe, F. J. (1978). The measruement of human penile tumescence.Psychophysiology, 15, 366–376.
Shouten, P. G., & Simon, W. T. (1992). Validity of phallometric measures with sex offenders: Comments on the Quinsey, Laws, and Hall debate.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 812–814.
Simon, W. T., & Shouten, P. G. W. (1991). Plethysmography in the assessment and treatment of sexual deviance: An oversiew.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20(1), 75–91.
Wheeler, D., & Rubin, H. B. (1987). A comparison of volumetric and circumferential measures of penile erection.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16(4), 289–299.
Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human.Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howes, R.J. A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sex Abuse 7, 9–24 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254871
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254871