Skip to main content
Log in

Spectrum of spontaneous missense mutations causing cyclic AMP-resistance phenotypes in cultured S49 mouse lymphoma cells differs markedly from those of mutations induced by alkylating mutagens

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Mutants of S49 mouse lymphoma cells resistant to cytolysis by analogs of cyclic AMP (cAMP) generally have missense mutations in the gene encoding the regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. We have compared the mutations in 95 spontaneous isolates with those in 60 mutagen-induced isolates by sequence analysis of amplified cDNAs. Twenty-nine single basepair substitutions in 19 codons produced selectable phenotypes. The spontaneous mutant spectrum was dominated by a CpG transition hotspot in the codon for Arg334. This and other nearby CpG sites were found to be methylated in genomic S49 cell DNA by restriction enzyme analyses. Most of the remaining spontaneous mutants had either G-C→C-G or T-A→G-C transversions, which have been associated with damage caused by oxygen radicals. In contrast, the majority of mutants induced with the alkylating mutagens ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine had G-C→A-T mutations at non-CpG sites; in addition, EMS induced several A-T→G-C, A-T→T-A, and G-C→T-A substitutions. A single ICR191-induced mutant analyzed had a unique A-T→G-C lesion. A number of spontaneous and mutagen-induced isolates had closely linked double or triple substitutions, and two isolates had tandem triple substitutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Cooper, D.N., and Youssoufian, H. (1988).Hum. Genet. 78:151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohrenweiser, H.W., and Jones, I.M. (1990).Mutat. Res. 231:87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lindahl, T. (1990).Mutat. Res. 238:305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lutz, W.K. (1990).Mutat. Res. 238:287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xiao, W., and Samson, L. (1993).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:2117–2121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loeb, L.A., and Cheng, K.C. (1990).Mutat. Res. 238:297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kunkel, T.A. (1992).J. Biol. Chem. 267:18251–18254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harwood, J., Tachibana, A., and Meuth, M. (1991).Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3163–3170.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, L.-H., Vrieling, H., van Zeeland, A.A., and Jenssen, D. (1992).J. Mol. Biol. 223:627–635.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phear, G., Armstrong, W., and Meuth, M. (1989).J. Mol. Biol. 209:577–582.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fearon, E.R., and Jones, P.A. (1992).FASEB J. 6:2783–2790.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sommer, S.S. (1992).FASEB J. 6:2767–2774.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, C.S., and Steinberg, R.A. (1985).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 11:605–615.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steinberg, R.A., Gorman, K.B., Øgreid, D., Døskeland, S.O., and Weber, I.T. (1991).J. Biol. Chem. 266:3547–3553.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ashman, C.R., and Davidson, R.L. (1987).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:3354–3358.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ikehata, H., Akagi, T., Kimura, H., Akasaka, S., and Kato, T. (1989).Mol. Gen. Genet. 219:349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg, R.A., and Gorman, K.B. (1992).Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:767–772.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg, R.A., O'Farrell, P.H., Friedrich, U., and Coffino, P. (1977).Cell 10:381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  19. van Daalen Wetters, T., and Coffino, P. (1983).Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberg, R.A., Murphy, C.S., Russell, J.L., and Gorman, K.B. (1987).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 13:645–659.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steinberg, R.A., van Daalen Wetters, T., and Coffino, P. (1978).Cell 15:1351–1361.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Friedrich, U., and Coffino, P. (1977).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74:679–683.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clegg, C.H., Correll, L.A., Cadd, G.G., and McKnight, G.S. (1987).J. Biol. Chem. 262:13111–13119.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shuntoh, H., and Steinberg, R.A. (1991).J. Cell. Physiol. 146:86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gorman, K.B., and Steinberg, R.A. (1989).BioTechniques 7:326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., and Sambrook, J. (1982).Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Feinberg, A.P., and Vogelstein, B. (1984).Anal. Biochem. 137:266.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rideout, W.M., III, Coetzee, G.A., Olumi, A.F., and Jones, P.A. (1990).Science 249:1288–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tasheva, E.S., and Roufa, D.J. (1993).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 19:275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Øgreid, D., Ekanger, R., Suva, R.H., Miller, J.P., and Døskeland, S.O. (1989).Eur. J. Biochem. 181:19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perutz, M.F. (1990).J. Mol. Biol. 213:203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Topal, M.D. (1988).Carcinogenesis 9:691–696.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yang, J.-L., Hu, M.-C., and Wu, C.-W. (1991).J. Mol. Biol. 221:421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, L.-H., and Jenssen, D. (1991).Carcinogenesis 12:1903–1909.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Preston, B.D., Singer, B., and Loeb, L.A. (1986).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:8501–8505.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eckert, K.A., Ingle, C.A., Klinedinst, D.K., and Drinkwater, N.R. (1988).Mol. Carcinogen. 1:50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, G.S.-F., Blonsky, K.S., On, D.L.V., Savage, E.A., Morgan, A.R., and von Borstel, R.C. (1992).J. Mol. Biol. 223:617–626.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cabral-Neto, J.B., Gentil, A., Caseira-Cabral, R.E., and Sarasin, A. (1992).J. Biol. Chem. 267:19718–19723.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gentil, A., Cabral-Neto, J.B., Mariage-Samson, R., Margot, A., Imbach, J.L., Rayner, B., and Sarasin, A. (1992).J. Mol. Biol. 227:981–984.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kamiya, H., Suzuki, M., Komatsu, Y., Miura, H., Kikuchi, K., Sakaguchi, T., Murata, N. Masutani, C., Hanaoka, F., and Ohtsuka, E. (1992).Nucleic Acids Res. 20:4409–4415.

    Google Scholar 

  41. de Oliveira, R.C., Ribeiro, D.T., Nigro, R.G., Di Mascio, P., and Menck, C.F.M. (1992).Nucleic Acids Res. 20:4319–4323.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McBride, T.J., Schneider, J.E., Floyd, R.A., and Loeb, L.A. (1992).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89:6866–6870.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cheng, K.C., Cahill, D.S., Kasai, H., Nishimura, S., and Loeb, L.A. (1992).J. Biol. Chem. 267:166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moraes, E.C., Keyse, S.M., and Tyrrell, R.M. (1990).Carcinogenesis 11:283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Reed, J., and Hutchinson, F. (1987).Mol. Gen. Genet. 208:446–449.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kohalmi, S.E., and Kunz, B.A. (1988).J. Mol. Biol. 204:561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pastink, A., Vreeken, C., Nivard, M.J.M., Searles, L.L., and Vogel, E.W. (1989).Genetics 123:123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ripley, L.S., and Glickman, B.W. (1983).Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 47:851–861.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ellison, K.S., Dogliotti, E., Connors, T.D., Basu, A.K., and Essigmann, J.M. (1989).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:8620–8624.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mitra, G., Pauly, G.T., Kumar, R., Pei, G.K., Hughes, S.H., Moschel, R.C., and Barbacid, M. (1989).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:8650–8654.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorman, K.B., Steinberg, R.A. Spectrum of spontaneous missense mutations causing cyclic AMP-resistance phenotypes in cultured S49 mouse lymphoma cells differs markedly from those of mutations induced by alkylating mutagens. Somat Cell Mol Genet 20, 301–311 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254719

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254719

Keywords

Navigation