Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 149–182 | Cite as

Behold the wrath: Psychophysiological responses to facial stimuli

  • Ulf Dimberg
  • Arne Öhman
Article

Abstract

The complex musculature of the human face has been shaped by natural selection to produce gestures that communicate information about intentions and emotional states between senders and receivers. According to the preparedness hypothesis, different facial gestures are differentially prepared by evolution to become associated with different outcomes. As attested by psychophysiological responses in Pavlovian conditioning experiments, expressions of anger and fear more easily become signals for aversive stimuli than do expression of happiness. Consistent with the evolutionary perspective, the superior conditioning to angry faces is stronger for male than for female faces, for adult than for child faces, and for faces directed toward the receiver rather than directed away. Furthermore, it appears to be primarily located in the right cerebral hemisphere. The enhanced autonomic activity to angry faces signaling electric shock is not mediated by conscious cognitive activity, but is evident also when recognition of the facial stimulus is blocked by backward masking procedures. Similarly, conditioned responses can be established to masked angry, but not to masked happy faces. Electromyographic measurement of facial muscle activity reveals a tendency for emotional facial expression to rapidly and automatically elicit its mirror image in the face of the receiver, typically accompanied by the appropriate emotional experience. The research reviewed in this paper supports the proposition that humans have been evolutionarily tuned to respond automatically to facial stimuli, and it is suggested that such early automatic reactions shape the subsequent conscious emotional processing of the stimulus.

Keywords

Facial Expression Pavlovian Conditioning Aversive Stimulus Facial Muscle Autonomic Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelman, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B. (1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion.Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280.Google Scholar
  2. Andrew, R. J. (1963). Evolution of facial expression.Science, 142, 1034–1041.Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976).Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buck R. (1980). Nonverbal behavior and the theory of emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 811–824.Google Scholar
  5. Buck, R. (1984).The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, A., & Eysenck, M. W. (1995). Trait anxiety, anxious mood, and threat detection.Cognition and Emotion, 9, 549–562.Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, R. (1995).The thinking ape: Evolutionary origins of intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1973). Facial expression of emotion in non-human primates. In P. Ekman (Ed.) Darwin and facial expression (pp. 11–89) New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Damasio, A. R. (1994).Descartes' error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, C. (1872).The expression of emotion in man and animals. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  11. Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions.Psychophysiology, 19, 643–647.Google Scholar
  12. Dimberg, U. (1983). Emotional conditioning to facial stimuli: A psychobiological analysis. InActa Universitatis Upsaliensis, Abstracts of Uppsala dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, 29, Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  13. Dimberg, U. (1986a). Facial expressions as excitatory and inhibitory stimuli for conditioned autonomic responses.Biological Psychology, 22, 37–57.Google Scholar
  14. Dimberg, U. (1986b). Facial reactions to fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli.Biological Psychology, 23, 153–161.Google Scholar
  15. Dimberg, U. (1987). Facial reactions, autonomic activity and experienced emotion: A three component model of emotional conditioning.Biological Psychology, 24, 105–122.Google Scholar
  16. Dimberg, U. (1988a). Facial expressions and emotional reactions: A psychobiological analysis of human social behavior. In H. Wagner (Ed.),Social psychophysiology: Theory and clinical applications (pp. 131–150). New York: Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Dimberg, U. (1988b). Facial electromyography and the experience of emotion.Journal of psychophysiology, 3, 277–282.Google Scholar
  18. Dimberg, U. (1990a). Facial electromyography and emotional reactions (award address for distinguished early career contribution to psychophysiology, 1988).Psychophysiology, 27, 481–494.Google Scholar
  19. Dimberg, U. (1990b). Facial reactions to auditory stimuli: Sex differences.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 228–233.Google Scholar
  20. Dimberg, U. (1991). Emotional reactions to facial expressions: A case of automatic responding?Psychophysiology, 28, S19.Google Scholar
  21. Dimberg, U. (1994). Facial reactions: “Immediate7rd emotional reactions.Psychophysiology, 31, S40.Google Scholar
  22. Dimberg, U. (1995). Fear of snakes evokes the face: A case of rapid automatic responding?Psychophysiology, 32, S28.Google Scholar
  23. Dimberg, U. (in press). Psychophysiological reactions to facial expressions. In U. Segerstråle & P. Molnar (Eds.),Human by nature: Nonverbal communication in social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Dimberg, U. (1996a). Rapid facial reactions to emotional facial expressions (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  25. Dimberg, U. (1996b).Facial reactions: Rapidly evoked emotional responses (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  26. Dimberg, U., & Christmanson, L. (1991). Facial reactions to facial expressions in subjects high and low in public speaking fear.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 32, 246–253.Google Scholar
  27. Dimberg, U., & Karlsson, B. (1996). Facial reactions: Communication or emotion? (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  28. Dimberg, U., & Lundquist, L. O. (1990). Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions.Biological Psychology, 30, 151–159.Google Scholar
  29. Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1983). The effects of directional facial cues on electrodermal conditioning to facial stimuli.Psychophysiology, 20, 160–167.Google Scholar

Behold the Wrath

  1. Dimberg, U., & Thell, S. (1988). Facial electromyography, fear relevance and the experience of stimuli.Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 213–219.Google Scholar
  2. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1972). Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive movements. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.),Nonverbal communication (pp 297–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ekman, P. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions. In P. Ekman (Ed.),Darwin and facial expression. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions.Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169–200.Google Scholar
  5. Esteves, F., Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1994a). Automatically elicited fear: Conditioned skin conductance responses to masked facial expressions.Cognition and Emotion, 8, 393–413.Google Scholar
  6. Esteves, F., Parra, C., Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1994b). Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli.Psychophysiology, 31, 375–385.Google Scholar
  7. Esteves, F., & Öhman, A. (1993). Masking the face: Recognition of emotional facial expressions as a function of the parameters of backward masking.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 1–18.Google Scholar
  8. Fridlund, A. J. (1994).Human facial expressions: An evolutionary view. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, F. K. (1979). Distinguishing among orienting, defense, and startle reflexes. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 137–167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917–924.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1994). Automatic emotion: Attention and facial efference. In P. M. Niederthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.),The heart's eve: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 217–243). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994).Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hinde, R., A. (1974).Biological bases of human social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Hjortsjö, C. H. (1970).Man's face and mimic language. Malmö, Sweden: Nordens Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
  16. Hodes, R. L., Cook, E. W., III, & Lang, P. J. (1985). Individual differences in autonomic arousal: Conditioned associations or conditioned fear?Psychophysiology, 22, 545–560.Google Scholar
  17. Hugdahl, K. (1995). Classical conditioning and implicit learning: The right hemisphere hypothesis. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdhal (Eds.),Brain asymmetry (pp. 235–267). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hugdahl, K. (1996).Psychophysiology: The mind-body perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hugdahl, K., & Johnsen, B. H. (1993). Brain asymmetry and autonomic conditioning: Skin conductance responses. In J.-C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.),Progress in electrodermal research (pp. 271–287). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Humphrey, N. (1984).Consciousness regained: Chapters in the development of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Izard, C.E. (1977).Human emotions. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  22. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion?Mind, 9, 188–205.Google Scholar
  23. Johnsen, B. H., & Hugdahl, K. (1991). Hemispheric asymmetry in conditioning to facial emotional expressions.Psychophysiology, 28, 154–162.Google Scholar
  24. Johnsen, B. H., & Hugdahl, K. (1993). Right hemisphere representation of autonomic conditioning to facial emotional expressions.Psychophysiology, 30, 274–278.Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1987).An introduction to behavioral ecology (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  27. Lanzetta, J. T., & Orr, S. P. (1980). The influence of facial expressions on the classical conditioning of fear.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1081–1087.Google Scholar
  28. Lanzetta, J. T. & Orr, S. P. (1981). Stimulus properties of facial expressions and their influence on classical conditioning of fear.Motivation and Emotion, 5, 225–234.Google Scholar
  29. Lanzetta, J. T. & Orr, S. P. (1986). Excitatory strength of expressive faces: Effects of happy and fear expressions and context on the extinction of a conditioned fear response.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 190–194.Google Scholar
  30. Ley, R. G., & Bryden, M. P. (1979). Hemispheric differences in recognizing faces and emotions.Brain and Language, 7, 127–138.Google Scholar
  31. Lovibond, P. F., Siddle, D. A. T., & Bond, N. W. (1993). Resistance to extinction of fear-relevant stimuli: Preparedness or selective sensitization?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 449–461.Google Scholar
  32. Lundquist, L.-O., & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious.Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 203–211.Google Scholar
  33. Mandler, G. (1975).Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Marcel, A. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes.Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.Google Scholar
  35. Mazurski, E. J., Bond, N. W., Siddle, D. A. T., & Lovibond, P. F. (1996). Conditioning with facial expressions of emotion: Effects of CS sex and age.Psychophysiology, 33, 416–425.Google Scholar
  36. McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., & Englis, B. G., (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1513–1529.Google Scholar
  37. Öhman, A. (1979). Fear relevance, autonomic conditioning, and phobias: A laboratory model. In P.-O. Sjöden, S. Bates, & W. S. Dockens, III (Eds.),Trends in behavior therapy (pp. 107–133). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Öhman, A. (1983). The orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. In D. A. T. Siddle (Ed.),Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research (pp. 315–369). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion.Psychophysiology, 23, 123–145.Google Scholar
  40. Öhman, A. (1992). Orienting and attention: Preferred preattentive processing of potentially phobic stimuli. In B. A. Campbell, H. Haynes, & R. Richardson (Eds.),Attention and information processing in infants and adults. Perspectives from human and animal research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Öhman, A. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomena: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information processing mechanisms. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.),Handbook of emotions (pp. 511–536). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Öhman, A. (1996). Preferential preattentive processing of threat in anxiety: Preparedness and attentional biases. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.),Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 253–290). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Öhman, A. (in press). As fast as the blink of an eye: Evolutionary preparedness for preattentive processing of threat. In P. J. Lang, M. Balaban, & R. F. Simons (Eds.),Attention and motivation: Cognitive perspectives from psychophysiology, reflexology, and neuroscience. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Öhman, A., & Dimberg, U. (1978). Facial expressions as conditioned stimuli for electrodermal responses: A case of “preparedness?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1251–1258.Google Scholar
  45. Öhman, A., & Dimberg, U. (1984). An evolutionary perspective on human social behavior. In W. M. Waid (Ed.),Sociophysiology (pp. 47–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Öhman, A., Dimberg, U., & Esteves, F. (1989). Preattentive activation of aversive emotions. In T. Archer and L.-G. Nilsson (Eds.),Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety (pp. 169–193). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Öhman, A., Dimberg, U., & Öst, L.-G. (1985). Animal and social phobias: Biological constraints on learned fear responses. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.),Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 123–178). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Öhman, A., Eriksson, A., Fredrikson, M., Hugdahl, K., & Olofsson, C. (1974). Habituation of the electrodermal orienting reaction to potentially phobic and supposedly neutral stimuli in normal human subjects.Biological Psychology, 2, 85–93.Google Scholar

Behold the Wrath

  1. Öhman, A., Eriksson, A., & Olofsson, C. (1975). One-trial learning and superior resistance to extinction of autonomic responses conditioned to potentially phobic stimuli.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 619–627.Google Scholar
  2. Öhman, A., Esteves, F., Flykt, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1993). Gateways to consciousness: Emotion, attention, and electrodermal activity. In J.-C. Roy, W. Boucsein, D. C. Fowles, & J. H. Gruzelier (Eds.),Progress in electrodermal research (pp. 137–157). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. Öhman, A., Fredrikson, M., & Hugdahl, K. (1978). Orienting and defensive responding in the electrodermal system: Palmar-dorsal differences and recovery-rate during conditioning to potentially phobic stimuli.Psychophysiology, 15, 93–101.Google Scholar
  4. Öhman, A., Fredrikson, M., Hugdahl, K., & Rimmö. P.-A. (1976). The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: Conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 313–337.Google Scholar
  5. Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1994). Unconscious anxiety: Phobic responses to masked stimuli.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 231–240.Google Scholar
  6. Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1996). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli: Unconsciously originated expectancies for aversive outcomes following non-recognized fear-relevant stimuli (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  7. Orr, S. P., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1980). Facial expressions of emotion as conditioned human autonomic responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 278–282.Google Scholar
  8. Orr, S. P., & Lanzetta, J. T. (1984). Extinction of an emotional response in the presence of facial expressions of emotion.Motivation and Emotion, 8, 55–66.Google Scholar
  9. Packer, J. S., Clark, B. M., Bond, N. W., & Siddle, D. A. T. (1991). Conditioning with facial expressions of emotion: A comparison of aversive and nonaversive unconditioned stimuli.Journal of Psychophysiology, 5, 79–88.Google Scholar
  10. Parra, C., Esteves, F., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1996). Aversive conditioning to social stimuli: Backward masking and the dissociation of implicit and explicit cognitive processes (manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  11. Pitman, R. K., & Orr, S. P. (1986). Test of conditioning model of neurosis: Differential aversive conditioning of angry and neutral facial expressions in anxiety disorder patients.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 208–213.Google Scholar
  12. Redican, W. K. (1982). An evolutionary perspective on human facial displays. In P. Ekman (Ed.),Emotion in the human face (2nd ed., 212–280). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.Google Scholar
  14. Schwartz, G. E., Fair, P. L., Salt, P., Mandel, M. R., & Klerman, G. L. (1976). Facial muscle patterning to affective imagery in depressed and nondepressed subjects.Science, 192, 489–491.Google Scholar
  15. Schwartz, G., E., Brown, S. L., & Ahern, G. L. (1980). Facial muscle patterning and subjective experience during affective imagery: Sex differences.Psychophysiology, 17, 75–82.Google Scholar
  16. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Review, 77, 406–418.Google Scholar
  17. Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness.Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.Google Scholar
  18. Seligman, M. E. P., & Hager, J. E. (Eds.) (1972).Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  19. Sergent, J. (1995). Hemispheric contribution to face processing: Patterns of convergence and divergence. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdhal (Eds.),Brain asymmetry (pp. 157–181). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Simons, R. F., Öhman, A., & Lang, P. J. (1979). Anticipation and response set: Cortical, cardiac and electrodermal correlates.Psychophysiology, 16, 222–233.Google Scholar
  21. Spinks, J., & Kramer, A. (1991). Capacity views of human information processing: Autonomic measures. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology, Central and autonomic nervous system approaches. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Tomkins, S. S. (1962).Affect, imagery and consciousness. The positive affects. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Wong, P. S., Shevrin, H., & Williams, W. J. (1994). Conscious and nonconscious processes: An ERP index of an anticipatory response in a conditioning paradigm using visually masked stimuli.Psychophysiology, 31, 87–101.Google Scholar
  24. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Dimberg
    • 2
  • Arne Öhman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska Institute and Hospital, Z6StockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations