Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 112–117 | Cite as

d-Amphetamine-induced “Floating limb” syndrome in young rhesus monkeys

  • Edward D. Levin
  • Philip J. Bushnell
  • Craig M. Baysinger
Original Investigations

Abstract

Acuted-amphetamine administration to young rhesus monkeys (N=10) caused a motor syndrome of hypoactivity and chorea-like postures and motor movements which we have termed “floating limb”. Frequently after subcutaneous injections of 0.3 or 0.6 mg/kgd-amphetamine, an affected monkey raised one or both legs or arms and held the limb(s) motionless in the air. Affected limbs were usually returned to a normal position if they appeared to enter the animal's visual field. In other cases, the monkey assumed bizarre and contorted postures which were held for prolonged periods. Such postures were often accompanied by gentle repetitive brushing of the ears and facial hair with extremities of the affected limbs. Quantification of the frequency of these movements showed that they occurred regularly for 90–150 min afterd-amphetamine. Hydroxyamphetamine, a peripherally-acting amphetamine analog, did not induce floating limb, indicating that the behavior was probably mediated by central actions ofd-amphetamine. A similar disorder has been reported occasionally in other studies with monkeys and cats. It may be related to the chorea that is seen in humans after the use of amphetamine and other stimulants.d-Amphetamine treatment in young monkeys may provide a viable model of human choreoathetoid disorders induced by disease or drug use.

Key words

Rhesus Monkeys Amphetamine Dyskinesia Athetosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander MF, Isaac W (1965) Effect of illumination andd-amphetamine on activity of the rhesus macaque. Psychol Rep 16:311–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomquist AJ, Harlow HF (1961) The infant rhesus monkey program at the University of Wisconsin Primate Laboratory. Proc Animal Care Panel 11:57–64Google Scholar
  3. Bonthala CM, West A (1983) Pemoline induced chorea and Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. Br J Psychiatr 143:300–302Google Scholar
  4. Briscoe JG, Curry SC, Gerkin RD, Ruiz RR (1988) Pemoline-induced choreoathetosis and rhabdomyolysis. Med Toxicol 3:72–76Google Scholar
  5. Chiarello RJ, Cole JO (1987) The use of psychostimulants in general psychiatry: a reconsideration. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:286–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crossman AR (1987) Primate models of dyskinesia: the experimental approach to the study of basal ganglia-related involuntary movement disorders. Neuroscience 21:1–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crowley TJ, Stynes AJ, Hydinger M, Kaufman IC (1974) Ethanol, methamphetamine, pentobarbitol, morphine, and monkey social behavior. Arch Gen Psychiatry 31:829–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellinwood EH, Kilbey MM (1975) Amphetamine stereotypy: the influence of environmental factors and prepotent behavioral patterns on its topography and development. Biol Psychiatry 10:3–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellinwood EH, Sudilovsky A, Nelson L (1972) Behavioral analysis of chronic amphetamine intoxication. Biol Psychiatry 4:215–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Extein I (1978) Methylphenidate-induced choreoathetosis. Am J Psychiatry 135:252–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garver DL, Schlemmer HF, Maas JW, Davis JM (1975) A schizophreniform behavioral psychosis mediated by dopamine. Am J Psychiatry 132:33–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Harlow HF (1958) The nature of love. Am Psychol 13:673–685Google Scholar
  13. Isaac W, Troelstrup R (1969) Opposite effect of illumination andd-amphetamine upon activity in squirrel monkey (Saimiri) and owl monkey (Aotes). Psychopharmacologia 15:260–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kallman WM, Isaac W (1975) The effects of age and illumination on the dose-response curves for three stimulants. Psychopharmacologia 40:313–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Klawans HL, Weiner WJ (1974) The effect ofd-amphetamine on choreiform movement disorders. Neurology 24:312–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Klawans HL, Weiner WJ (1976) The pharmacology of choreatic movement disorders. Prog Neurobiol 6:49–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lowther WR, Isaac W (1976) The effects ofd-amphetamine and illumination on behaviors of the squirrel monkey. Psychopharmacology 50:231–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundh H, Tunving K (1981) An extrapyramidal choreiform syndrome caused by amphetamine addiction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44:728–730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marascuilo LA, McSweeney M (1977) Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Wadsworth, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Miczek KA, Gold LH (1983)d-Amphetamine in squirrel monkeys of different social status: effects on social and agonistic behavior, locomotion and stereotypies. Psychopharmacology 81:183–190Google Scholar
  21. Miczek KA, Woolley J, Schlisserman S, Yoshimura H (1981) Analysis of amphetamine effects on agonistic and affiliative behavior in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciueus). Pharmacol Biochem Behav [Suppl 1] 14:103–107Google Scholar
  22. Nausieda PA, Koller WC, Weiner WJ, Klawans HL (1981) Pemoline-induced chorea. Neurology 31:356–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen EB, Lyon M (1982) Behavioral alterations during prolonged low level continuous amphetamine administration in a monkey family group (Cercopithecus aethiops). Biol Psychiatry 17:423–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nielsen EB, Eison MS, Lyon M, Iversen SD (1983) Hallucinatory behaviors in primates produced by around-the-clock amphetamine treatment for several days via implanted capsules. In: Miczek KA (ed) Ethopharmacology: primate models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Liss, New York, pp 79–100Google Scholar
  25. Odom B, Mitchell G, Lindberg D (1970) A device to record primate social behavior. Primate 11:93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peffer-Smith PG, Smith EO, Byrd LD (1983) Effects ofd-amphetamine on self-aggression and posturing in stumptail macaques. J Exp Anal Behav 40:313–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhee KJ, Albertson TE, Douglas JC (1988) Choreoathetoid disorder associated with amphetamine-like drugs. Am J Emerg Med 6:131–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rylander G (1972) Psychoses and punding and choreiform syndromes in addictions to central stimulant drugs. Psychiatr Neurol Neurochirg 75:203–212Google Scholar
  29. Schiørring E (1977) Changes in individual and social behavior induced by amphetamine and related compounds in monkeys and man. In: Ellinwood EH, Kilbey MM (eds) Cocaine and other stimulants. Plenum Press, New York, pp 481–522Google Scholar
  30. Schiørring E (1981) Psychopathology induced by “speed drugs”. Pharmacol Biochem Behav [Suppl 1] 14:109–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schlemmer RF, Davis JM (1983) A comparison of three psychotomimetic-induced models of psychosis in nonhuman primate social colonies. In: Miczek KA (ed) Ethopharmacology: primate models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 33–78Google Scholar
  32. Singh BK, Singh A, Chusid E (1983) Chorea in long-term use of pemoline. Ann Neurol 13:218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weiner N (1980) Norepinephrine, epinephrine, and the sympathomimetic amines. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Gilman A (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. MacMillan, New York, pp 138–175Google Scholar
  34. Weiner WJ, Nausieda PA, Klawans HL (1978) Methylphenidate-induced chorea: case report and pharmacologic implications. Neurology 28:1041–1044PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGray-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward D. Levin
    • 1
  • Philip J. Bushnell
    • 1
  • Craig M. Baysinger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Harlow Primate LaboratoryUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.LivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations