Skip to main content
Log in

The integration of individual and family therapy

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is time to put an end to the separation in training programs between individual and family therapy. Competent therapists should be able to think at an intrapsychic and circular level concurrently. Training programs should maintain their current major focus and develop their minor area of expertise sufficiently so that their graduates can practice both individual and family therapy and choose whichever modality is more appropriate to the case at the time. Bridge concepts, essential differences, and some integrative approaches in individual and marriage and family therapy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacal, H. A., & Newman, K. M. (1990).Theories of object relations: Bridges to self psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972).Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantyne Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentovim, A., & Kinston, W. (1991). Focal family therapy: Joining systems theory with psychodynamic understanding. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Ed.),Handbook of family therapy (Vol. II), (pp. 284–324), New York: Brunner-Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (1973).Invisible loyalties. Hagerstown MD: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978).Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, S. (1993). A systems therapist looks at transference: Widening the lens.Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 21, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., & Pinsof, W. M. (1982). Problem maintenance in family systems: An integrative model.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. (1982). Dysfunctional marital conflict: An integrative interpersonal intrapsychic Model.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A. J. (1963) Family myth and homeostasis.Archives of General Psychiatry 9, 457–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framo, J. (1976). Family of origin as a therapeutic resource for adults in marital and family therapy: You can and should go home again.Family Process, 15, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1992).Family therapy with couples: The family-of-origin approach. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, H. (1991) Systems theory, cybernetics, and epistemology. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy (Vol. II) (pp. 41–62). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1965). Family rules: The marital quid pro quo.Family Process, 12, 589–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1957). The question of family homeostasis.Psychiatric Quarterly (Supplement), 31, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, F. (1987) Trends in family psychology.Journal of Family Psychology, 1, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1948).Contributions to psycho-analysis 1921–1945. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971).The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallouk, T. (1982) The interpersonal context of object relations: Implications for family therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 429–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988).Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. (1987).The self in the system: Expanding the limits of family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N., & Paul, B. (1990). Enhancing empathy in couples. In R. Chasin, H. Grunebaum, & M. Hersig, (Eds.),One couple, four realities: Multiple perspectives on couple therapy (pp. 85–105). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. (1983). Integrative problem-centered therapy: Toward a synthesis of family and individual psychotherapies.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V. (1964).Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir, V., & Baldwin, M. (1983)Satir step by step. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, D. E., & Scharff, J. S. (1987).Object relations family therapy. Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. G., Wynne, L. C., McDaniel, S. H., & Gawinski, B. A. (1994). The marginalization of family therapy: A historical and continuing problem.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20, 117–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Slipp, S. (1984).Object relations: A dynamic bridge between individual and family treatment. Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. (1992). Closing the gap between theory and practice with better psychoanalytical theory.Psychotherapy 29(2), 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, E. F., & Wachtel, P. L. (1986).Family dynamics in individual psychotherapy: A guide to clinical strategies. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, C. A., & Keith D. V. (1981). Symbolic-experiential family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy (pp. 187–224). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990).Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1958).Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braverman, S. The integration of individual and family therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 17, 291–305 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252667

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252667

Key words

Navigation