Skip to main content
Log in

Freud's theory of paranoid delusion based on the Schreber case contrasted with related theories

  • Theoretical
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The historic importance of Freud's analysis of the Schreber case is acknowledged, even though the theory it expounds is largely disavowed. The theory ascribes the cause of paranoid delusion to homosexual impulses unresolved in infancy or early childhood. This paper summarizes Freud's monograph on Schreber and contrasts his theory with the views of various revisionists. The writers focus on the Freudian concept of projection, which is intended to explain how much meaning can become reversed under the impetus of stress, and the reversal lead to delusional thinking. Based on their work in family therapy, where they observed one form of pathogenic relating termed learning to be possessed, the writers concluded that this form was also based on a type of projection which could culminate in delusional ideation. A relationship between learning to be possessed and H. S. Sullivan's theory of paranoid transformation is described. A learning factor is present in several of the psychological theories advanced to explain delusion, and the factor is akin to if not identical with Freud's concept of projection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, K. (1908). The psycho-sexual differences between hysteria and dementia praecox. InSelected papers of Karl Abraham, MD. London: Hogarth (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1922). On the part played by homosexuality in the pathogenesis of paranoia. InContributions to psychoanalysis (trans. by E. Jones). Boston: Badger (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1911). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). InStandard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12 (trans. by J. Strachey, pp. 9–79). London: Hogarth (1953–1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. (1915). On psychological understanding. In C. Jung,The psychogenesis of mental illness. Bollingen Series 20. New York: Pantheon (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katan, M. (1950). Schreber's hallucination about the “little men.”International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 31, 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katan, M. (1953). Schreber's prepsychotic phase.International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 34, 43–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946). Note on some schizoid mechanisms.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathane Z. (1992).In defense of Schreber: soul murder and psychiatry. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. W. (1980). Theories of personality and psychopathology. In H. I. Caplan, A. M. Freedman, & B. J. Sadock (Eds.),Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (Vol. 1, 3rd ed., pp. 631–728). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederland, J. G. (1974).The Schreber case: Psychoanalytic profile of a paranoid personality. Hillsdale, NJ: Quadrangle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1963). The attainment of invariants and reversible operations in the development of thinking.Social Research, 30, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. & Weil, A. M. (1951). The development in children of the idea of homeland and of relations with other countries.International Social Science Bulletin, 3, 561–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, M. (1973).Soul murder: Persecution in the family. New York: American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreber, D. P. (1903).Denkwurdiqkeiten eines nervenkranken nebst nachtrage und einem anhanq uber die frage: “Unter welchen voraussetzungen darf fur geisteskrank erachtete person geqen ihren erklarten willen in eine heilanstalt festgehalten werden?” Leipzig: Mutze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953).The interpersonal theory of psychiatry, Vol. 1 (H. S Perry & M. L. Gawel, Eds.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, G. H. (1984). On the pathology of blaming.International Journal of Family Therapy, 6, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, G. H. (1989). Learning to be possessed as a form of pathogenic relating and a cause of certain delusions.Contemporary Family Therapy, 11, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, G. H., & Zuk, C. V. (1992). The logic of delusion.Contemporary Family Therapy, 14, 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Gerald Zuk, PhD, is in private practice at 25316 Pacy Street, Santa Clarita, California 91321-3343. Carmen Zuk, MD, is a child psychiatrist-partner affiliated with the Southern California Permanente Medical Group at its psychiatric clinic in Van Nuys, California. Both may be reached by telephone at (805) 252-7702.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuk, G.H., Zuk, C.V. Freud's theory of paranoid delusion based on the Schreber case contrasted with related theories. Contemp Fam Ther 17, 209–216 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252359

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02252359

Key words

Navigation